Literature DB >> 2056458

A compressive strength study of complete ceramic crowns. Part II.

B A Josephson1, A Schulman, Z A Dunn, W Hurwitz.   

Abstract

The original study by this group compared the crushing strength of Cerestore crowns with porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns and porcelain jackets. Since that time, two porcelains, Dicor and Renaissance, have become available. This study compares Cerestore, Dicor, and Renaissance crowns using a porcelain-fused-to-metal crown as a standard for the type of crown with maximum strength that is currently available and an all-porcelain crown to represent the porcelain with the least strength. All of the methods used in the first study were used again. The results demonstrated that these new porcelains have strengths that make them questionable for routine use in every posterior crown situation.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2056458     DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(91)90230-t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  2 in total

1.  Contact damage in model dental multilayers: an investigation of the influence of indenter size.

Authors:  P Shrotriya; R Wang; N Katsube; R Seghi; W O Soboyejo
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Influence of the supporting die structures on the fracture strength of all-ceramic materials.

Authors:  Munir Tolga Yucel; Isa Yondem; Filiz Aykent; Oğuz Eraslan
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 3.573

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.