Literature DB >> 2056362

Comparison of various physiologic and psychomotor parameters in patients sedated with intravenous lorazepam, diazepam, or midazolam during oral surgery.

P van der Bijl1, J A Roelofse, J J Joubert, J F van Zyl.   

Abstract

Intravenously administered lorazepam (0.05 mg/kg), diazepam (0.25 mg/kg), and midazolam (0.1 mg/kg) were compared for sedation during oral surgery under local anesthesia. Sixty patients were randomly allocated into three groups in this double-blind, parallel study. The results from this trial show that all three drugs provide satisfactory sedation. Average mean arterial pressures, however, decreased significantly with midazolam and diazepam. Statistically significantly higher heart rates during the entire procedure were also found for lorazepam when compared with diazepam and midazolam. At the postblock stage, the midazolam group had respiratory rates that were significantly higher than those of the other two drug groups. Patients in the diazepam and midazolam groups took significantly longer to complete the pegboard test at the preblock stage than those in the lorzepam group. At 1, 1.5, and 2 hours after arrival in the recovery room, an inversion of groups took place, with the lorazepam group taking significantly longer for their tests than the other two groups. Significantly more improvement in anxiety levels was found at 10 minutes postdrug for the patients who had received diazepam and this tended to remain so on arrival in the recovery room. When compared with the other two groups, significantly more patients in the lorazepam group reported giddiness/dizziness and significantly more in the diazepam group reported pain on injection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2056362     DOI: 10.1016/s0278-2391(10)80224-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  5 in total

1.  Intravenous sedation prior to peribulbar anaesthesia for cataract surgery in elderly patients.

Authors:  D H Wong; P M Merrick
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.063

2.  Effects of music intervention on anxiety and pain reduction in ambulatory maxillofacial and otorhinolaryngology surgery: a descriptive survey of 27 cases.

Authors:  Chafik Keilani; Nicolas Simondet; Ramzi Maalouf; Ahmet Yigitoglu; Alexandre Bougrine; Didier Simon; Isabelle Fligny
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-04-01

3.  Sedation of children undergoing dental treatment.

Authors:  Paul F Ashley; Mohsin Chaudhary; Liege Lourenço-Matharu
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-12-17

Review 4.  The anxiolytic effect of midazolam in third molar extraction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Qi Chen; Lufei Wang; Lina Ge; Yuan Gao; Hang Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Muscle power during intravenous sedation.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Matsuura
Journal:  Jpn Dent Sci Rev       Date:  2017-03-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.