Literature DB >> 20563470

Aortic root reconstruction through valve-sparing operation: critical analysis of 11 years of follow-up.

Ricardo Ribeiro Dias1, Omar V Mejia, Edemir V Carvalho, Diogo O C Lage, Altamiro Ribeiro Dias, Pablo M A Pomerantzeff, Charles Mady, Noedir A G Stolf.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The composite mechanical valve conduit replacement is the standardized operation for aneurysms of the aortic root. The objective of this study is to evaluate the long-term surgical results of aortic valve-preserving procedures to the root reconstruction.
METHODS: From 1996 to 2008, 54 consecutive patients underwent two different techniques of valve-sparing aortic root operation (40 Yacoub operations and 14 David operations). Mean age was 48 +/- 14 years (range 17 to 74). 36 patients (66.7%) were male and 16 (29.6%) experienced Marfan's syndrome. The mean Euroscore was 4 +/- 1.25. The mean follow up time was 4.1 years (from 49 days to 10.9 years). Clinical and echocardiographic parameters were analysed. T-Student paired test, the McNemar Non Parametric test and the Kaplan-Meyer Outcome Curves have been used.
RESULTS: The hospital mortality was 5.6% and the average hospitalization time was 9+/-4 days. One non related late death (2%) was reported. The actuarial survival and freedom from reoperation were respectively 94.4% and 96% within 11 years of follow-up. There were benefits in reduction of functional class (P=0.002; 78% CF I), in reduction of aortic regurgitation (P<0.001; 78% with or without discrete reflux), in reduction of systolic and diastolic diameters, end-sytolic and end-diastolic volumes of left ventricle (respectively P=0.004; P<0.0001; P=0.036 and P<0.001). Two (3.9%) patients required aortic valve replacement due to severe aortic regurgitation during this same period. No thromboembolic, endocarditis or bleeding events were reported during the follow-up.
CONCLUSION: The valve-sparing operation for aortic root aneurysms is an effective alternative to the use of a mechanical valve conduit replacement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20563470     DOI: 10.1590/s0102-76382010000100015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc


  3 in total

1.  Repair of aortic root in patients with aneurysm or dissection: comparing the outcomes of valve-sparing root replacement with those from the Bentall procedure.

Authors:  Edvard Skripochnik; Robert E Michler; Viktoria Hentschel; Siyamek Neragi-Miandoab
Journal:  Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc       Date:  2013 Oct-Dec

2.  Does aortic valve repair in valve-sparing aortic root reconstruction compromise the longevity of the procedure?

Authors:  Ricardo Ribeiro Dias; José Augusto Duncan; Fabrício José de Souza Dinato; Lucas Lacerda Araújo; Hugo Monteiro Neder Issa; Fábio Fernandes; Charles Mady; Fábio Biscegli Jatene
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.365

3.  Surgery of the aortic root: should we go for the valve-sparing root reconstruction or the composite graft-valve replacement is still the first choice of treatment for these patients?

Authors:  Fernando de Azevedo Lamana; Ricardo Ribeiro Dias; Jose Augusto Duncan; Leandro Batisti de Faria; Luiz Marcelo Sa Malbouisson; Luciano de Figueiredo Borges; Charles Mady; Fábio Biscegli Jatene
Journal:  Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.