BACKGROUND: The Stop Atherosclerosis in Native Diabetics Study (SANDS) reported cardiovascular benefit of aggressive versus standard treatment targets for both low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and blood pressure (BP) in diabetic individuals. OBJECTIVE: In this analysis, we examined within trial cost-effectiveness of aggressive targets of LDL-C ≤70 mg/dL and systolic BP≤115 mmHg versus standard targets of LDL-C ≤100 mg/dL and systolic BP ≤130 mmHg. DESIGN: Randomized, open label blinded-to-endpoint 3-year trial. DATA SOURCES: SANDS clinical trial database, Quality of Wellbeing survey, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Wholesale Drug Prices. TARGET POPULATION: American Indians ≥ age 40 years with type 2 diabetes and no previous cardiovascular events. TIME HORIZON: April 2003 to July 2007. PERSPECTIVE: Health payer. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized to aggressive versus standard groups with treatment algorithms defined for both. OUTCOME MEASURES: Incremental cost-effectiveness. RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: Compared with the standard group, the aggressive group had slightly lower costs of medical services (-$116) but a 54% greater cost for BP medication ($1,242) and a 116% greater cost for lipid-lowering medication ($2,863), resulting in an increased cost of $3,988 over 3 years. Those in the aggressively treated group gained 0.0480 quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) over the standard group. When a 3% discount rate for costs and outcomes was used, the resulting cost per QALY was $82,589. RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: The use of a 25%, 50%, and 75% reduction in drug costs resulted in a cost per QALY of $61,329, $40,070, and $18,810, respectively. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by use of a single ethnic group and by its 3-year duration. CONCLUSIONS: Within this 3-year study, treatment to lower BP and LDL-C below standard targets was not cost-effective because of the cost of the additional medications required to meet the lower targets. With the anticipated availability of generic versions of the BP and lipid-lowering drugs used in SANDS, the cost-effectiveness of this intervention should improve. Published by Elsevier Inc on behalf of the National Lipid Association.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The Stop Atherosclerosis in Native Diabetics Study (SANDS) reported cardiovascular benefit of aggressive versus standard treatment targets for both low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and blood pressure (BP) in diabetic individuals. OBJECTIVE: In this analysis, we examined within trial cost-effectiveness of aggressive targets of LDL-C ≤70 mg/dL and systolic BP ≤115 mmHg versus standard targets of LDL-C ≤100 mg/dL and systolic BP ≤130 mmHg. DESIGN: Randomized, open label blinded-to-endpoint 3-year trial. DATA SOURCES: SANDS clinical trial database, Quality of Wellbeing survey, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Wholesale Drug Prices. TARGET POPULATION: American Indians ≥ age 40 years with type 2 diabetes and no previous cardiovascular events. TIME HORIZON: April 2003 to July 2007. PERSPECTIVE: Health payer. INTERVENTIONS:Participants were randomized to aggressive versus standard groups with treatment algorithms defined for both. OUTCOME MEASURES: Incremental cost-effectiveness. RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: Compared with the standard group, the aggressive group had slightly lower costs of medical services (-$116) but a 54% greater cost for BP medication ($1,242) and a 116% greater cost for lipid-lowering medication ($2,863), resulting in an increased cost of $3,988 over 3 years. Those in the aggressively treated group gained 0.0480 quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) over the standard group. When a 3% discount rate for costs and outcomes was used, the resulting cost per QALY was $82,589. RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: The use of a 25%, 50%, and 75% reduction in drug costs resulted in a cost per QALY of $61,329, $40,070, and $18,810, respectively. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by use of a single ethnic group and by its 3-year duration. CONCLUSIONS: Within this 3-year study, treatment to lower BP and LDL-C below standard targets was not cost-effective because of the cost of the additional medications required to meet the lower targets. With the anticipated availability of generic versions of the BP and lipid-lowering drugs used in SANDS, the cost-effectiveness of this intervention should improve. Published by Elsevier Inc on behalf of the National Lipid Association.
Authors: Björn Dahlöf; Richard B Devereux; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Stevo Julius; Gareth Beevers; Ulf de Faire; Frej Fyhrquist; Hans Ibsen; Krister Kristiansson; Ole Lederballe-Pedersen; Lars H Lindholm; Markku S Nieminen; Per Omvik; Suzanne Oparil; Hans Wedel Journal: Lancet Date: 2002-03-23 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Anthony Keech; David Colquhoun; James Best; Adrienne Kirby; R John Simes; David Hunt; Wendy Hague; Elaine Beller; Manjula Arulchelvam; Jennifer Baker; Andrew Tonkin Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Helen M Colhoun; D John Betteridge; Paul N Durrington; Graham A Hitman; H Andrew W Neil; Shona J Livingstone; Margaret J Thomason; Michael I Mackness; Valentine Charlton-Menys; John H Fuller Journal: Lancet Date: 2004 Aug 21-27 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Scott M Grundy; James I Cleeman; C Noel Bairey Merz; H Bryan Brewer; Luther T Clark; Donald B Hunninghake; Richard C Pasternak; Sidney C Smith; Neil J Stone Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-07-13 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jeffrey M Pyne; William J Sieber; Kristin David; Robert M Kaplan; Mark Hyman Rapaport; D Keith Williams Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Peter Gaede; Pernille Vedel; Nicolai Larsen; Gunnar V H Jensen; Hans-Henrik Parving; Oluf Pedersen Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-01-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Barbara V Howard; Mary J Roman; Richard B Devereux; Jerome L Fleg; James M Galloway; Jeffrey A Henderson; Wm James Howard; Elisa T Lee; Mihriye Mete; Bryce Poolaw; Robert E Ratner; Marie Russell; Angela Silverman; Mario Stylianou; Jason G Umans; Wenyu Wang; Matthew R Weir; Neil J Weissman; Charlton Wilson; Fawn Yeh; Jianhui Zhu Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-04-09 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Khadijah Breathett; Mario Sims; Marie Gross; Elizabeth A Jackson; Emily J Jones; Ana Navas-Acien; Herman Taylor; Kevin L Thomas; Barbara V Howard Journal: Circulation Date: 2020-05-28 Impact factor: 29.690