Literature DB >> 20562072

PLAATO (Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Transcatheter Occlusion) for prevention of cardioembolic stroke in non-anticoagulation eligible atrial fibrillation patients: results from the European PLAATO study.

Yves-Laurent Bayard1, Heyder Omran, Petr Neuzil, Leif Thuesen, Maximilian Pichler, Edward Rowland, Angelo Ramondo, Witold Ruzyllo, Werner Budts, Gilles Montalescot, Pedro Brugada, Patrick W Serruys, Alec Vahanian, Jean-François Piéchaud, Antonio Bartorelli, Jean Marco, Peter Probst, Karl-Heinz Kuck, Stefan H Ostermayer, Franziska Büscheck, Evelyn Fischer, Michaela Leetz, Horst Sievert.   

Abstract

AIMS: The European PLAATO (Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Transcatheter Occlusion) study was performed to determine the safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage occlusion by catheter technique. Embolic stroke due to atrial fibrillation is a common observation, especially in the elderly. Most thrombi in atrial fibrillation form in the left atrial appendage (LAA), its occlusion may therefore reduce the incidence of stroke in these patients. METHODS AND
RESULTS: One hundred and eighty patients with non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation and contraindication to warfarin therapy were enrolled in the PLAATO study. Patients were eligible if they had a?history of transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or stroke or at least two independent risk factors for stroke such as age > or =75 years, hypertension, congestive heart failure or diabetes. The primary endpoint was LAA closure as determined by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) two months after the procedure and stroke rate at 150 patient years. Left atrial appendage occlusion was successful in 162/180 patients (90%, 95% CI 83.1% to 92.9%). Two patients died within 24 hours of the procedure (1.1%, 95% CI 0.3% to 4%). Six cardiac tamponades were observed (3.3%, 95% CI 1.5% to 7.1%). In two cases, surgical drainage of the tamponade was necessary (1.1%, 95% CI 0.3% to 4%). In one patient, the device that was chosen was too small and embolised into the aorta after its release (0.6%, 95% CI 0.1% to 3.1%). It was snared and replaced without further complications. Successful occlusion of the LAA was achieved in 126/ 140 (90%, 95% CI 83.5% to 94.2%) of patients as noted by TEE at the two months follow-up. In a follow-up time of 129 documented patient years, three strokes occurred (2.3% per year). The expected incidence of stroke according to the CHADS2-Score was 6.6% per year. The trial was halted prematurely during the follow-up phase for financial considerations.
CONCLUSIONS: Left atrial appendage closure is relatively safe and effective. However, severe complications can occur. It might become an alternative for atrial fibrillation patients who are ineligible for long-term anticoagulation therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20562072     DOI: 10.4244/

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EuroIntervention        ISSN: 1774-024X            Impact factor:   6.534


  44 in total

1.  Percutaneous management of periprocedural cardiac perforation during left atrial appendage closure.

Authors:  Nico Reinsch; Hagen Kälsch; Philipp Kahlert
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 2.  Left atrial appendage exclusion for prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation: review of minimally invasive approaches.

Authors:  Joshua D Moss
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Left atrial appendage exclusion for atrial fibrillation: does the protection from stroke prevail in the long-term?

Authors:  Vaibhav R Vaidya; Roshini Asirvatham; Jason Tri; Samuel J Asirvatham
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Contrast-enhanced CMR in patients after percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage: a pilot study.

Authors:  Oliver K Mohrs; Nina Wunderlich; Steffen E Petersen; Anselm Pottmeyer; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 5.364

5.  Incomplete occlusion of the left atrial appendage with the percutaneous left atrial appendage transcatheter occlusion device is not associated with increased risk of stroke.

Authors:  Juan F Viles-Gonzalez; Vivek Y Reddy; Jan Petru; Tomas Mraz; Zuzana Grossova; Stepan Kralovec; Petr Neuzil
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 6.  Cather-based approaches to stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Sunil Kapur; Moussa Mansour
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 7.  Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Michael Katsnelson; Sebastian Koch; Tatjana Rundek
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2010-10-22

Review 8.  Role of Cardiac Imaging for Catheter-based Left Atrial Appendage Closure.

Authors:  Sébastien Marchandise; Joëlle Kefer; Jean-Benoît le Polain de Waroux; Christophe Scavée Jean-Louis Vanoverschelde
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2013-06-30

Review 9.  Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion for Stroke Prevention in Patients with Nonrheumatic Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Peter B Sick
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2013-10-31

10.  Pulmonary artery perforation and coronary air embolism-two fatal outcomes in percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion.

Authors:  J Zwirner; R Bayer; C Hädrich; A Bollmann; N Klein; J Dreßler; B Ondruschka
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 2.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.