Literature DB >> 20562035

Sensitivity analysis for biomedical models.

Zhenghui Hu1, Pengcheng Shi.   

Abstract

This article discusses the application of sensitivity analysis (SA) in biomedical models. Sensitivity analysis is widely applied in physics, chemistry, economics, social sciences and other areas where models are developed. By assigning a prior probability distribution to each model variable, the SA framework appeals to the posterior probabilities of the model to evaluate the relative importance of these variables on the output distribution based on the principle of general variance decomposition. Within this framework, the SA paradigm serves as an objective platform to quantify the contributions of each model factor relative to their empirical range. We present statistical derivations of variance-based SA in this context and discuss its detailed properties through some practical examples. Our emphasis is on the application of SA in the biomedical field. As we show, it may provide a useful tool for model quality assessment, model reduction and factor prioritization, and improve our understanding of the model structure and underlying mechanisms. When usual approaches for calculating sensitivity index involve the employment of Monte Carlo analysis, which is computationally expensive in the large-sampling paradigm, we develop two effective numerical approximate methods for quick SA evaluations based on the unscented transformation (UT) that utilize a deterministic sampling approach in place of random sampling to calculate posterior statistics. We show that these methods achieve an excellent compromise between computational burden and calculation precision. In addition, a clear guideline is absent to evaluate the importance of variable for model reduction, we also present an objective statistical criterion to quantitatively decide whether or not a descriptive parameter is nominal and may be discarded in ensuing model-based analysis without significant loss of information on model behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20562035     DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2010.2053044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  7 in total

1.  Reliable and efficient approach of BOLD signal with dual Kalman filtering.

Authors:  Cong Liu; Zhenghui Hu
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 2.238

2.  Nonlinear Bayesian estimation of BOLD signal under non-Gaussian noise.

Authors:  Ali Fahim Khan; Muhammad Shahzad Younis; Khalid Bashir Bajwa
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 2.238

3.  A Sensitivity Analysis of fMRI Balloon Model.

Authors:  Chadia Zayane; Taous Meriem Laleg-Kirati
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 2.238

4.  Nonlinear estimation of BOLD signals with the aid of cerebral blood volume imaging.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Zuli Wang; Zhongzhou Cai; Qiang Lin; Zhenghui Hu
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 2.819

5.  What can we learn from global sensitivity analysis of biochemical systems?

Authors:  Edward Kent; Stefan Neumann; Ursula Kummer; Pedro Mendes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Influence of Resting Venous Blood Volume Fraction on Dynamic Causal Modeling and System Identifiability.

Authors:  Zhenghui Hu; Pengyu Ni; Qun Wan; Yan Zhang; Pengcheng Shi; Qiang Lin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Investigating Human Neurovascular Coupling Using Functional Neuroimaging: A Critical Review of Dynamic Models.

Authors:  Clément Huneau; Habib Benali; Hugues Chabriat
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 4.677

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.