Literature DB >> 20561167

In vitro assessment of antimicrobial properties of rifampin-coated Titan(®) Coloplast penile implants and comparison with Inhibizone(®).

Chirpriya Dhabuwala1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: It is a common practice to soak Titan(®) Coloplast penile implants in antibiotic solution prior to implantation. Aim.  The aim of this study is to identify an ideal solution for soaking the Titan(®) Coloplast penile implants prior to implantation.
METHODS: Titan(®) strips were soaked in a different combination of antibiotics and the zone of inhibition was studied against Staphylococcus epidermidis and Escherichia coli. This zone of inhibition was compared against zone of inhibition produced by Inhibizone(®) -coated silicone strips. Zones of inhibitions were also compared for different components of Inhibizone(®) implant such as cylinder, tubing, connector, rear tip extender, and reservoir, and compared with similar components of Titan(®) Coloplast penile implants. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The zone of inhibition against S. epidermidis and E. coli for Titan strips dipped in Rifampin and Gentamicin was compared against other antibiotics. The clinical significance of dipping Titan(®) -coated Coloplast implant in Rifampin and Gentamicin solution was determined.
RESULTS: Rifampin 10mg/mL+gentamicin 1mg/mL (R10/G1) and rifampin 1mg/mL+gentamicin 1mg/mL (R1/G1) had excellent coverage against S. epidermidis and E. coli. The zone of inhibition (utilizing the Titan(®) coating) produced by both these solutions exceeds that produced by Inhibizone(®) by 40% to 56% for S. epidermidis and 33% for E. coli. Components of the American Medical System implant (tubing connectors and rear tip extenders) are not coated with antibiotics and had no zone of inhibition.
CONCLUSION: Soaking Titan(®) -coated Coloplast implants in R10/G1 solution produces a zone of inhibition greater than that produced by Inhibizone(®) -coated penile implants. The clinical significance of this increased zone of inhibition can only be determined by a separate clinical study.
© 2010 International Society for Sexual Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20561167     DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01874.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Med        ISSN: 1743-6095            Impact factor:   3.802


  5 in total

Review 1.  A Surgeon's Guide to the Various Antibiotic Dips Available During Penile Prosthesis Implantation.

Authors:  Soum D Lokeshwar; Joshua Bitran; Vinayak Madhusoodanan; Bruce Kava; Ranjith Ramasamy
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Vancomycin Wrap for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery: Molecular Insights.

Authors:  Caroline M Atherton; Simon J Spencer; Katy McCall; Emma Garcia-Melchor; William J Leach; Michael Mullen; Brian P Rooney; Colin Walker; Iain B McInnes; Neal L Millar; Moeed Akbar
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 3.  Penile implant infection factors: a contemporary narrative review of literature.

Authors:  Bryce A Baird; Kevin Parikh; Gregory Broderick
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-10

Review 4.  A scoping review of penile implant biofilms-what do we know and what remains unknown?

Authors:  Joon Yau Leong; Courtney E Capella; Maria J D'Amico; Selin Isguven; Caroline Purtill; Priscilla Machado; Lauren J Delaney; Gerard D Henry; Noreen J Hickok; Flemming Forsberg; Paul H Chung
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2022-08

Review 5.  Penile prosthesis surgery in the management of erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Hossein Sadeghi-Nejad; Mina Fam
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2013-07-02
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.