Literature DB >> 20560650

Monitoring microbial community structure and dynamics during in situ U(VI) bioremediation with a field-portable microarray analysis system.

Darrell P Chandler1, Alexander Kukhtin, Rebecca Mokhiber, Christopher Knickerbocker, Dora Ogles, George Rudy, Julia Golova, Phil Long, Aaron Peacock.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to develop and validate a simple, field-portable, microarray system for monitoring microbial community structure and dynamics in groundwater and subsurface environments, using samples representing site status before acetate injection, during Fe-reduction, in the transition from Fe- to SO(4)(2-)-reduction, and into the SO(4)(2-)-reduction phase. Limits of detection for the array are approximately 10(2)-10(3) cell equivalents of DNA per reaction. Sample-to-answer results for the field deployment were obtained in 4 h. Retrospective analysis of 50 samples showed the expected progression of microbial signatures from Fe- to SO(4)(2-) -reducers with changes in acetate amendment and in situ field conditions. The microarray response for Geobacter was highly correlated with qPCR for the same target gene (R(2) = 0.84). Microarray results were in concordance with quantitative PCR data, aqueous chemistry, site lithology, and the expected microbial community response, indicating that the field-portable microarray is an accurate indicator of microbial presence and response to in situ remediation of a uranium-contaminated site.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20560650     DOI: 10.1021/es1006498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  7 in total

1.  Molecular analysis of the metabolic rates of discrete subsurface populations of sulfate reducers.

Authors:  M Miletto; K H Williams; A L N'Guessan; D R Lovley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Metagenomic applications in environmental monitoring and bioremediation.

Authors:  Stephen M Techtmann; Terry C Hazen
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.346

3.  Profiling in situ microbial community structure with an amplification microarray.

Authors:  Darrell P Chandler; Christopher Knickerbocker; Lexi Bryant; Julia Golova; Cory Wiles; Kenneth H Williams; Aaron D Peacock; Philip E Long
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Evaluation of a field-portable DNA microarray platform and nucleic acid amplification strategies for the detection of arboviruses, arthropods, and bloodmeals.

Authors:  Nathan D Grubaugh; Lawrence N Petz; Vanessa R Melanson; Scott S McMenamy; Michael J Turell; Lewis S Long; Sarah E Pisarcik; Ampornpan Kengluecha; Boonsong Jaichapor; Monica L O'Guinn; John S Lee
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 2.345

5.  Evaluation of a genome-scale in silico metabolic model for Geobacter metallireducens by using proteomic data from a field biostimulation experiment.

Authors:  Yilin Fang; Michael J Wilkins; Steven B Yabusaki; Mary S Lipton; Philip E Long
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 6.  Molecular Tools for Monitoring Trichoderma in Agricultural Environments.

Authors:  László Kredics; Liqiong Chen; Orsolya Kedves; Rita Büchner; Lóránt Hatvani; Henrietta Allaga; Viktor D Nagy; Jamal M Khaled; Naiyf S Alharbi; Csaba Vágvölgyi
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 7.  Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Bacterial Uranium Resistance.

Authors:  Tom Rogiers; Rob Van Houdt; Adam Williamson; Natalie Leys; Nico Boon; Kristel Mijnendonckx
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 5.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.