Literature DB >> 20559729

A self-reported work-sampling study in community pharmacy practice: a 2009 update.

Laura McCann1, Carmel M Hughes, Colin G Adair.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Using a self-reported work sampling methodology this study investigated how community pharmacists utilised their time, and quantified how much time pharmacists devoted to specific activities.
SETTING: Community pharmacies (n = 30) in the Greater Belfast area.
METHOD: A classification system was developed to define all activities (professional, semi-professional, and non-professional tasks) which could potentially be performed by a community pharmacist in the course of a normal working day (from 9.00 to 6.00 pm). A random bleeper device was used which was programmed to bleep randomly approximately 13 times per day (over 12 days) at which time the pharmacist recorded their precise activity (using the classification system) at that time on a proforma. All completed data sheets for each pharmacy were entered into an Excel spreadsheet, where the number of observations for each activity was expressed as a proportion of the total number of observations per day. Statistical analysis was carried out in SPSS, comparing these data to similar data which had been collected in 1998.
RESULTS: Pharmacists in this study were found to spend approximately 49% of their time engaged in professional activities, 31% in semi-professional activities and 20% involved in non-professional activities which was similar to that reported in 1998. Most time was spent on assembly and labelling of products, whilst staff training occupied the least amount of pharmacists' time. Pharmacists with a prescription volume of less than 1,499 per month spent significantly more time counselling patients on OTC medicines and responding to symptoms than those dispensing 1,500 items/month or more (P = 0.027). Pharmacists who employed a pre-registration student apportioned less time to the assembly and labelling of products compared to those without a student (P = 0.08). Pharmacists with three or more staff spent less time on coding and endorsing of prescriptions compared to those with less staff (P = 0.086).
CONCLUSION: Pharmacists in this study are spending more time checking prescriptions (essential component of pharmaceutical care) and are still managing to spend only 20% of their time on non-professional activities. However, there had been relatively little change in the way in which pharmacists in this sample spent their time compared to a previous study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20559729     DOI: 10.1007/s11096-010-9405-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm World Sci        ISSN: 0928-1231


  11 in total

1.  Work measurement in hospital pharmacy.

Authors:  M J Roberts; T O Kvalseth; R L Jermstad
Journal:  Top Hosp Pharm Manage       Date:  1982-08

2.  A comparison of self-reported and observational work sampling techniques for measuring time in nursing tasks.

Authors:  Amanda Ampt; Johanna Westbrook; Nerida Creswick; Nadine Mallock
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2007-01

3.  Multidimensional work sampling to study the activities of decentralized clinical pharmacists.

Authors:  L D Ried; T E West; P Martin; W Force
Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm       Date:  1991-06

4.  An exploration of work-related stress in Northern Ireland community pharmacy: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Laura McCann; Colin G Adair; Carmel M Hughes
Journal:  Int J Pharm Pract       Date:  2009-10

5.  Opportunities and responsibilities in pharmaceutical care.

Authors:  C D Hepler; L M Strand
Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm       Date:  1990-03

6.  Self-reported work-sampling methods for evaluating pharmaceutical services.

Authors:  N A Nickman; R M Guerrero; J N Bair
Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm       Date:  1990-07

7.  Work sampling. Analyzing nursing staff productivity.

Authors:  B K Hagerty; R S Chang; C D Spengler
Journal:  J Nurs Adm       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 1.737

8.  A self-reported work sampling study in community pharmacy practice.

Authors:  H M Bell; J C McElnay; C M Hughes
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1999-10

9.  Patient counseling provided in community pharmacies: effects of state regulation, pharmacist age, and busyness.

Authors:  Bonnie L Svarstad; Dara C Bultman; Jeanine K Mount
Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb

10.  The general pharmacy work explored in The Netherlands.

Authors:  M P Mark
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2008-01-20
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of pharmacist-led fee-for-services medication review.

Authors:  Ernieda Hatah; Rhiannon Braund; June Tordoff; Stephen B Duffull
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Indigenous and immigrant populations' use and experience of community pharmacies in New Zealand.

Authors:  James A Green; Kasey Brown; Jason Burgess; Doris Chong; Kevin Pewhairangi
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2013-02

3.  Adherence counseling during patient contacts in swiss community pharmacies.

Authors:  Fabienne Boeni; Isabelle Arnet; Kurt E Hersberger
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 2.711

4.  A qualitative study exploring the impact and consequence of the medicines use review service on pharmacy support-staff.

Authors:  Asam Latif; Helen F Boardman; Kristian Pollock
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2013-06-30

Review 5.  Community pharmacy: an untapped patient data resource.

Authors:  David John Wright; Michael James Twigg
Journal:  Integr Pharm Res Pract       Date:  2016-03-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.