BACKGROUND: We defined a new measure of the morning blood pressure (BP) surge (MBPS) that is derived by the product of the rate of morning rise (RoR) and the amplitude (day-night difference) giving an effective "Power" of the BP rise (BP(Power)). We applied this method to determine whether morning BP(Power) is different in hypertensives compared to normotensives, males compared to females or altered by antihypertensive treatment. METHODS: BP(Power), RoR, and day-night amplitude were calculated using a double logistic fit of 691 ambulatory recordings. RESULTS: Ambulatory recordings from untreated male and female subjects showed that upper quartile (distributed by day BP, n = 100) had a 92% greater BP(Power) (P < 0.001) than the lower quartile subjects (n = 100) due to both a faster RoR and greater amplitude. Males had a 29% greater BP(Power) than females (P = 0.003). Untreated hypertensives and white coat hypertensives showed a greater morning BP(Power) (+158% and +86%, respectively) compared to matched normotensives. Subjects taking calcium channel blockers and diuretics alone or in combination with angiotensin receptor blockers had lower morning BP(Power) than those on angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin receptor antagonists alone. CONCLUSIONS: A new measure of the MBPS, BP(Power) which is based on a mathematical estimate of the rate and amplitude of the rise, is higher in hypertensives, white coat hypertensives, and is modifiable by some specific antihypertensive therapies suggests that it may be theoretically useful to highlight those subjects at greatest risk of cardiovascular events and for determining the most benefit of antihypertensive therapy.
BACKGROUND: We defined a new measure of the morning blood pressure (BP) surge (MBPS) that is derived by the product of the rate of morning rise (RoR) and the amplitude (day-night difference) giving an effective "Power" of the BP rise (BP(Power)). We applied this method to determine whether morning BP(Power) is different in hypertensives compared to normotensives, males compared to females or altered by antihypertensive treatment. METHODS: BP(Power), RoR, and day-night amplitude were calculated using a double logistic fit of 691 ambulatory recordings. RESULTS: Ambulatory recordings from untreated male and female subjects showed that upper quartile (distributed by day BP, n = 100) had a 92% greater BP(Power) (P < 0.001) than the lower quartile subjects (n = 100) due to both a faster RoR and greater amplitude. Males had a 29% greater BP(Power) than females (P = 0.003). Untreated hypertensives and white coat hypertensives showed a greater morning BP(Power) (+158% and +86%, respectively) compared to matched normotensives. Subjects taking calcium channel blockers and diuretics alone or in combination with angiotensin receptor blockers had lower morning BP(Power) than those on angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin receptor antagonists alone. CONCLUSIONS: A new measure of the MBPS, BP(Power) which is based on a mathematical estimate of the rate and amplitude of the rise, is higher in hypertensives, white coat hypertensives, and is modifiable by some specific antihypertensive therapies suggests that it may be theoretically useful to highlight those subjects at greatest risk of cardiovascular events and for determining the most benefit of antihypertensive therapy.
Authors: Gavin W Lambert; Geoffrey A Head; Won Sun Chen; Mark Hamer; Nicolaas T Malan; Stephen Quinn; Markus P Schlaich; Leone Malan Journal: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) Date: 2019-11-25 Impact factor: 3.738
Authors: Marcelo E Katz; Fernando Margulis; Rubén Schiavelli; Pablo Arias; Geoffrey A Head; Diego A Golombek Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2012-03-16 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Geoffrey A Head; Nick Andrianopoulos; Barry P McGrath; Catherine A Martin; Melinda J Carrington; Elena V Lukoshkova; Pamela J Davern; Garry L Jennings; Christopher M Reid Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-03-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Aaron W Johnson; Sarah L Hissen; Vaughan G Macefield; Rachael Brown; Chloe E Taylor Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2016-09-08 Impact factor: 4.677