Literature DB >> 20558674

Are incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance images in children merely incidental?

Surya Gupta1, Uday Kanamalla, Vikash Gupta.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that children with developmental delay without regression of unknown etiology are more likely to have intracranial incidental findings than are children with autistic spectrum disorder or children with normal development. Of 771 patients with magnetic resonance images, 363 (47.1%) patients had developmental delay, 55 (7.1%) had autistic spectrum disorders, and 353 (45.8%) were developmentally normal. Developmentally delayed children were more likely than those with normal development (odds ratio [OR], 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-2.5; P < .001) or those with autistic spectrum disorder (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.1-4.1; P = .019) to have an intracranial incidental finding. We report a higher prevalence of intracranial incidental findings in children with developmental delay as compared with those children with normal development. Future study should confirm whether the result of this study is merely incidental or truly related to a subgroup of children with developmental disability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20558674     DOI: 10.1177/0883073810370622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Child Neurol        ISSN: 0883-0738            Impact factor:   1.987


  9 in total

Review 1.  Spectrum of complicated migraine in children: A common profile in aid to clinical diagnosis.

Authors:  Surya N Gupta; Vikash S Gupta; Dawn M Fields
Journal:  World J Clin Pediatr       Date:  2015-02-08

2.  Incidental findings in youths volunteering for brain MRI research.

Authors:  R E Gur; D Kaltman; E R Melhem; K Ruparel; K Prabhakaran; M Riley; E Yodh; H Hakonarson; T Satterthwaite; R C Gur
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  Spectrum of intracranial incidental findings on pediatric brain magnetic resonance imaging: What clinician should know?

Authors:  Surya N Gupta; Vikash S Gupta; Andrew C White
Journal:  World J Clin Pediatr       Date:  2016-08-08

4.  Structural brain anomalies in healthy adolescents in the NCANDA cohort: relation to neuropsychological test performance, sex, and ethnicity.

Authors:  Edith V Sullivan; Barton Lane; Dongjin Kwon; M J Meloy; Susan F Tapert; Sandra A Brown; Ian M Colrain; Fiona C Baker; Michael D De Bellis; Duncan B Clark; Bonnie J Nagel; Kilian M Pohl; Adolf Pfefferbaum
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.978

5.  Incidental finding of an orbital foreign body in a child with microcephaly and developmental delay.

Authors:  Maria J Hall; Megan R Thomas; Mina Shekarchian; Vikesh Patel
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-02-19

6.  Arteriovenous Malformation in a Youth with Atypical Autism Symptoms.

Authors:  Veena Sison; Tracy Stackhouse; Robert Breeze; Terry Hall; Pamela McKenzie; Nicole Tartaglia
Journal:  J Child Dev Disord       Date:  2017-02-28

7.  A population study of Norwegian psychiatric patients referred for clinical brain scanning.

Authors:  Mona K Beyer; Turi O Dalaker; Ole J Greve; Siv E Pignatiello; Ingrid Agartz
Journal:  BJPsych Open       Date:  2018-05-08

8.  Growth patterns and associated risk factors of congenital malformations in twins.

Authors:  Ettore Piro; Ingrid Anne Mandy Schierz; Gregorio Serra; Giuseppe Puccio; Mario Giuffrè; Giovanni Corsello
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 2.638

9.  Actionable and incidental neuroradiological findings in twins with neurodevelopmental disorders.

Authors:  Lynnea Myers; Mai-Lan Ho; Elodie Cauvet; Karl Lundin; Torkel Carlsson; Ralf Kuja-Halkola; Kristiina Tammimies; Sven Bölte
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.