Literature DB >> 20558470

Support for higher ciprofloxacin AUC 24/MIC targets in treating Enterobacteriaceae bloodstream infection.

Sheryl A Zelenitsky1, Robert E Ariano.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Given concerns regarding optimal therapy for serious Gram-negative infections, the goal was to characterize the pharmacodynamics of ciprofloxacin in the context of treating bloodstream infection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were collected from the medical records of 178 clinical cases. Blood isolates were retrieved and ciprofloxacin MICs were measured. Forty-two cases in which ciprofloxacin was initiated within 24 h of the positive blood culture were used in the pharmacodynamic analysis.
RESULTS: Significant factors with regard to treatment failure were low ciprofloxacin AUC(24)/MIC (P < 0.0001), high MIC (P = 0.001), male sex (P = 0.002) and low AUC(24) (P = 0.01). AUC(24)/MIC (P = 0.012) and MIC (P = 0.019) were significant variables in multivariate analyses; however, only the former remained significant (P = 0.038) after excluding two cases with ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates. An AUC(24)/MIC breakpoint of 250 was most significant, with cure rates of 91.4% (32/35) and 28.6% (2/7) in patients with values above and below this threshold, respectively (P = 0.001). The risk of ciprofloxacin treatment failure was 27.8 times (95% confidence interval, 2.1-333) greater in those not achieving an AUC(24)/MIC >or=250 (P = 0.011). Monte Carlo simulation of 5000 study subjects predicted that 0.88 of the population would achieve an AUC(24)/MIC >or=250 with standard-dose ciprofloxacin (400 mg intravenously every 12 h).
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the pharmacodynamic parameters of ciprofloxacin that are important for optimizing the treatment of serious infections, particularly the benefits of achieving an AUC(24)/MIC >or=250, rather than the conventional target of >or=125. It also shows the relevance of dose selection in optimizing target attainment, with important differences among pathogens, even those with MICs within the susceptible range.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20558470     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkq211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  18 in total

Review 1.  Optimising drug dosing in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  Vesa Cheng; Mohd-Hafiz Abdul-Aziz; Jason A Roberts; Kiran Shekar
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Empiric antimicrobial therapy in severe sepsis and septic shock: optimizing pathogen clearance.

Authors:  Stephen Y Liang; Anand Kumar
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 3.  Individualising Therapy to Minimize Bacterial Multidrug Resistance.

Authors:  A J Heffernan; F B Sime; J Lipman; J A Roberts
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Clinical effectiveness of oral antimicrobial therapy for acute pyelonephritis caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriales.

Authors:  Si-Ho Kim; Kyoung Ree Lim; Hyunju Lee; Kyungmin Huh; Sun Young Cho; Cheol-In Kang; Doo Ryeon Chung; Kyong Ran Peck
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  The ciprofloxacin target AUC : MIC ratio is not reached in hospitalized patients with the recommended dosing regimens.

Authors:  Michiel Haeseker; Leo Stolk; Fred Nieman; Christian Hoebe; Cees Neef; Cathrien Bruggeman; Annelies Verbon
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 6.  Don't Get Wound Up: Revised Fluoroquinolone Breakpoints for Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Tam T Van; Emi Minejima; Chiao An Chiu; Susan M Butler-Wu
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016.

Authors:  Andrew Rhodes; Laura E Evans; Waleed Alhazzani; Mitchell M Levy; Massimo Antonelli; Ricard Ferrer; Anand Kumar; Jonathan E Sevransky; Charles L Sprung; Mark E Nunnally; Bram Rochwerg; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Derek C Angus; Djillali Annane; Richard J Beale; Geoffrey J Bellinghan; Gordon R Bernard; Jean-Daniel Chiche; Craig Coopersmith; Daniel P De Backer; Craig J French; Seitaro Fujishima; Herwig Gerlach; Jorge Luis Hidalgo; Steven M Hollenberg; Alan E Jones; Dilip R Karnad; Ruth M Kleinpell; Younsuk Koh; Thiago Costa Lisboa; Flavia R Machado; John J Marini; John C Marshall; John E Mazuski; Lauralyn A McIntyre; Anthony S McLean; Sangeeta Mehta; Rui P Moreno; John Myburgh; Paolo Navalesi; Osamu Nishida; Tiffany M Osborn; Anders Perner; Colleen M Plunkett; Marco Ranieri; Christa A Schorr; Maureen A Seckel; Christopher W Seymour; Lisa Shieh; Khalid A Shukri; Steven Q Simpson; Mervyn Singer; B Taylor Thompson; Sean R Townsend; Thomas Van der Poll; Jean-Louis Vincent; W Joost Wiersinga; Janice L Zimmerman; R Phillip Dellinger
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 8.  Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Principles of Anti-infective Dosing.

Authors:  Nikolas J Onufrak; Alan Forrest; Daniel Gonzalez
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.393

9.  Molecular characterization of extraintestinal Escherichia coli isolates in Japan: relationship between sequence types and mutation patterns of quinolone resistance-determining regions analyzed by pyrosequencing.

Authors:  Nozomi Aoike; Tomoo Saga; Ryuji Sakata; Ayumi Yoshizumi; Soichiro Kimura; Morihiro Iwata; Sadako Yoshizawa; Yasuyuki Sugasawa; Yoshikazu Ishii; Keizo Yamaguchi; Kazuhiro Tateda
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Population pharmacokinetics of intravenous and oral ciprofloxacin in children to optimize dosing regimens.

Authors:  D Hirt; M Oualha; B Pasquiers; S Blanot; R Rubinstazjn; C Glorion; S El Messaoudi; D Drummond; V Lopez; J Toubiana; A Béranger; Sana Boujaafar; Yi Zheng; Carmen Capito; S Winter; P L Léger; R Berthaud; Inès Gana; F Foissac; J M Tréluyer; N Bouazza; S Benaboud
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.