Literature DB >> 20558022

CT-guided pericardiocenteses: clinical profile, practice patterns and clinical outcome.

Katrin Eichler1, Stephan Zangos, Axel Thalhammer, Volkmar Jacobi, Felix Walcher, Ingo Marzi, Anton Moritz, Thomas J Vogl, Martin G Mack.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness and clinical outcome and technique of CT-guided pericardiocenteses in the treatment of pericardial effusions in adults and children.
METHODS: 20 drainages were performed in Seldinger-technique under CT-guidance on 20 patients suffering from pericardial effusions and haematomas. In 85%, the etiology of effusion was postoperative. The mean age of the patients was 59 years (minimum 9 years, maximum 86 years).There were 12 male and eight female patients. The inclusion criterion was an echocardiographically relevant proved pericardial effusion.
RESULTS: All catheters could be placed successfully (20/20) in the pericardial effusion and allowed for draining of the effusion in all cases under CT-guidance. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 0%. CT-guided pericardiocentesis was successful for withdrawing pericardial fluid and/or relieving tamponade in 100% of all procedures. No major complication was occurred. A total of one minor complication (5%) occurred that required no specific interventions, except for monitoring and appropriate follow-up. We observed one pneumothorax as a minor complication.
CONCLUSIONS: Pericardial effusions of various causes can be safely, effectively, and quickly managed with CT-guided pericardiocenteses in adults and children. The ventrolateral entry side for the puncture should be preferred to reach the whole effusion and avoid complications, like a pneumothorax. Copyright 2010. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20558022     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.04.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  4 in total

Review 1.  Computed tomography-guided pericardiocentesis: a systematic review concerning contemporary evidence and future perspectives.

Authors:  Eduardo M Vilela; Catarina Ruivo; Claudio E Guerreiro; Marisa P Silva; Ricardo Ladeiras-Lopes; Daniel Caeiro; Gustavo P Morais; João Primo; Pedro Braga; Nuno Ferreira; José Pedro L Nunes; Vasco Gama Ribeiro
Journal:  Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2018-08-15

Review 2.  CT-Guided Pericardial Drainage: A Safe and Viable Alternative to Ultrasound-Guided Drainage.

Authors:  Ross B Ingber; Mustafa Al-Roubaie; Umairullah Lodhi; Craig Greben
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 1.780

3.  Pericardiocentesis can be nasty. Accidents do occur while "Rail-roading" Sheaths and pigtails!

Authors:  Jitin Narula; Arindam Choudhury; Arun Sharma
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

4.  Feasibility and safety of CT-aided pericardiocentesis from a subxiphoid anterior approach by using fluoroscopy in patients with chronic pericardial effusions.

Authors:  Yu-Ki Iwasaki; Yuhi Fujimoto; Kanako Ito-Hagiwara; Eiichiro Oka; Hiroshi Hayashi; Yoshiaki Kubota; Hiroshige Murata; Teppei Yamamoto; Hideki Miyachi; Shuhei Tara; Yukichi Tokita; Kenji Yodogawa; Takeshi Yamamoto; Hitoshi Takano; Wataru Shimizu
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 3.287

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.