BACKGROUND: The Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equation underestimates measured glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at levels>60 mL/min/1.73 m2, with variable accuracy among subgroups; consequently, estimated GFR (eGFR)>or=60 mL/min/1.73 m2 is not reported by clinical laboratories. Here, performance of a more accurate GFR-estimating equation, the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation, is reported by level of GFR and clinical characteristics. STUDY DESIGN: Test of diagnostic accuracy. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Pooled data set of 3,896 people from 16 studies with measured GFR (not used for the development of either equation). Subgroups were defined by eGFR, age, sex, race, diabetes, prior solid-organ transplant, and body mass index. INDEX TESTS: eGFR from the CKD-EPI and MDRD Study equations and standardized serum creatinine. REFERENCE TEST: Measured GFR using urinary or plasma clearance of exogenous filtration markers. RESULTS: Mean measured GFR was 68+/-36 (SD) mL/min/1.73 m2. For eGFR<30 mL/min/1.73 m2, both equations have similar bias (median difference compared with measured GFR). For eGFR of 30-59 mL/min/1.73 m2, bias was decreased from 4.9 to 2.1 mL/min/1.73 m2 (57% improvement). For eGFR of 60-89 mL/min/1.73 m2, bias was decreased from 11.9 to 4.2 mL/min/1.73 m2 (61% improvement). For eGFR of 90-119 mL/min/1.73 m2, bias was decreased from 10.0 to 1.9 mL/min/1.73 m2 (75% improvement). Similar or improved performance was noted for most subgroups with eGFR<90 mL/min/1.73 m2, other than body mass index<20 kg/m2, with greater variation noted for some subgroups with eGFR>or=90 mL/min/1.73 m2. LIMITATIONS: Limited number of elderly people and racial and ethnic minorities with measured GFR. CONCLUSIONS: The CKD-EPI equation is more accurate than the MDRD Study equation overall and across most subgroups. In contrast to the MDRD Study equation, eGFR>or=60 mL/min/1.73 m2 can be reported using the CKD-EPI equation. Copyright (c) 2010 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: The Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equation underestimates measured glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at levels>60 mL/min/1.73 m2, with variable accuracy among subgroups; consequently, estimated GFR (eGFR)>or=60 mL/min/1.73 m2 is not reported by clinical laboratories. Here, performance of a more accurate GFR-estimating equation, the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation, is reported by level of GFR and clinical characteristics. STUDY DESIGN: Test of diagnostic accuracy. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Pooled data set of 3,896 people from 16 studies with measured GFR (not used for the development of either equation). Subgroups were defined by eGFR, age, sex, race, diabetes, prior solid-organ transplant, and body mass index. INDEX TESTS: eGFR from the CKD-EPI and MDRD Study equations and standardized serum creatinine. REFERENCE TEST: Measured GFR using urinary or plasma clearance of exogenous filtration markers. RESULTS: Mean measured GFR was 68+/-36 (SD) mL/min/1.73 m2. For eGFR<30 mL/min/1.73 m2, both equations have similar bias (median difference compared with measured GFR). For eGFR of 30-59 mL/min/1.73 m2, bias was decreased from 4.9 to 2.1 mL/min/1.73 m2 (57% improvement). For eGFR of 60-89 mL/min/1.73 m2, bias was decreased from 11.9 to 4.2 mL/min/1.73 m2 (61% improvement). For eGFR of 90-119 mL/min/1.73 m2, bias was decreased from 10.0 to 1.9 mL/min/1.73 m2 (75% improvement). Similar or improved performance was noted for most subgroups with eGFR<90 mL/min/1.73 m2, other than body mass index<20 kg/m2, with greater variation noted for some subgroups with eGFR>or=90 mL/min/1.73 m2. LIMITATIONS: Limited number of elderly people and racial and ethnic minorities with measured GFR. CONCLUSIONS: The CKD-EPI equation is more accurate than the MDRD Study equation overall and across most subgroups. In contrast to the MDRD Study equation, eGFR>or=60 mL/min/1.73 m2 can be reported using the CKD-EPI equation. Copyright (c) 2010 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: A H El-Gharbawy; J M Kotchen; C E Grim; M Kaldunski; R G Hoffmann; Z Pausova; D Gaudet; F Gossard; P Hamet; T A Kotchen Journal: Hypertension Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Lesley A Stevens; Josef Coresh; Christopher H Schmid; Harold I Feldman; Marc Froissart; John Kusek; Jerome Rossert; Frederick Van Lente; Robert D Bruce; Yaping Lucy Zhang; Tom Greene; Andrew S Levey Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Arlene B Chapman; Lisa M Guay-Woodford; Jared J Grantham; Vicente E Torres; Kyongtae T Bae; Deborah A Baumgarten; Philip J Kenney; Bernard F King; James F Glockner; Louis H Wetzel; Marijn E Brummer; W Charles O'Neill; Michelle L Robbin; William M Bennett; Saulo Klahr; Gladys H Hirschman; Paul L Kimmel; Paul A Thompson; J Philip Miller Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Harold I Feldman; Lawrence J Appel; Glenn M Chertow; Denise Cifelli; Borut Cizman; John Daugirdas; Jeffrey C Fink; Eunice D Franklin-Becker; Alan S Go; L Lee Hamm; Jiang He; Tom Hostetter; Chi-Yuan Hsu; Kenneth Jamerson; Marshall Joffe; John W Kusek; J Richard Landis; James P Lash; Edgar R Miller; Emile R Mohler; Paul Muntner; Akinlolu O Ojo; Mahboob Rahman; Raymond R Townsend; Jackson T Wright Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Paul Muntner; Britt Newsome; Holly Kramer; Carmen A Peralta; Yongin Kim; David R Jacobs; Catarina I Kiefe; Cora E Lewis Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2011-11-10 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Myra A Carpenter; Matthew R Weir; Deborah B Adey; Andrew A House; Andrew G Bostom; John W Kusek Journal: Clin Transplant Date: 2012-07-09 Impact factor: 2.863
Authors: Monique E Cho; Mary H Branton; David A Smith; Linda Bartlett; Lilian Howard; James C Reynolds; Donald Rosenstein; Sanjeev Sethi; M Berenice Nava; Laura Barisoni; Fernando C Fervenza; Jeffrey B Kopp Journal: Am J Nephrol Date: 2019-04-09 Impact factor: 3.754
Authors: D E Weiner; M A Carpenter; A S Levey; A Ivanova; E H Cole; L Hunsicker; B L Kasiske; S J Kim; J W Kusek; A G Bostom Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2012-05-17 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Juan Jesus Carrero; Marco Trevisan; Manish M Sood; Peter Bárány; Hong Xu; Marie Evans; Leif Friberg; Karolina Szummer Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2018-07-20 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Kyle A Richards; Edris Negron; Joshua A Cohn; Zoe Steinberg; Scott E Eggener; Arieh L Shalhav Journal: J Endourol Date: 2014-08-21 Impact factor: 2.942
Authors: Nawar M Shara; Hong Wang; Mihriye Mete; Yaman Rai Al-Balha; Nameer Azalddin; Elisa T Lee; Nora Franceschini; Stacey E Jolly; Barbara V Howard; Jason G Umans Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2012-07-25 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Lesley A Inker; Christina Wyatt; Rebecca Creamer; James Hellinger; Matthew Hotta; Maia Leppo; Andrew S Levey; Aghogho Okparavero; Hiba Graham; Karen Savage; Christopher H Schmid; Hocine Tighiouart; Fran Wallach; Zipporah Krishnasami Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2012-11-01 Impact factor: 3.731