Literature DB >> 20557662

Is there a need for a '100 questions exercise' to enhance fisheries and aquatic conservation, policy, management and research? Lessons from a global 100 questions exercise on conservation of biodiversity.

S J Cooke1, A J Danylchuk, M J Kaiser, M A Rudd.   

Abstract

Recent global and regional exercises have been undertaken to identify 100 questions of relevance to policy makers that, if answered, would improve decision making and conservation actions. These were intentionally broad, but all included themes and questions of relevance to aquatic and fisheries professionals (e.g. exploitation, habitat alteration, effectiveness of protected areas, migratory connectivity and environmental effects of aquaculture). Here, the content of the global 100 question exercise relevant to aquatic and fisheries issues is summarized and a critical analysis is provided. Many of the questions addressed in apparently unrelated themes and topics (e.g. terrestrial, agriculture and energy policy) have potential relevance to fisheries and aquatic habitats, which underlines the connectivity between terrestrial and aquatic realms. Given the intimate link between aquatic environmental problems and human activities (including culture and economics), greater understanding of the human dimension is required to inform decision making. Stakeholder perspectives need to be included as a core component of the fisheries management triangle (i.e. managing fish, habitat and people). The benefits and risks of conducting a global 100 questions exercise with an exclusive focus on questions of relevance to fisheries and aquatic practitioners are also considered. There is no question that evidence-based approaches to conservation are essential for addressing the many threats that face aquatic ecosystems and reverse the imperilment trends among ichthyofauna. It is still unclear, however, as to the extent to which 100 questions exercises will help to achieve conservation and management targets for aquatic resources. A global 100 questions exercise that focused on fisheries and aquatic issues would certainly help to generate interest and awareness sufficient to justify such an exercise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20557662     DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2010.02666.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fish Biol        ISSN: 0022-1112            Impact factor:   2.051


  5 in total

1.  Making predictive ecology more relevant to policy makers and practitioners.

Authors:  William J Sutherland; Robert P Freckleton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  A review and meta-analysis of collaborative research prioritization studies in ecology, biodiversity conservation and environmental science.

Authors:  Cody J Dey; Adam I Rego; Jonathan D Midwood; Marten A Koops
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The 50 most important questions relating to the maintenance and restoration of an ecological continuum in the European Alps.

Authors:  Chris Walzer; Christine Kowalczyk; Jake M Alexander; Bruno Baur; Giuseppe Bogliani; Jean-Jacques Brun; Leopold Füreder; Marie-Odile Guth; Ruedi Haller; Rolf Holderegger; Yann Kohler; Christoph Kueffer; Antonio Righetti; Reto Spaar; William J Sutherland; Aurelia Ullrich-Schneider; Sylvie N Vanpeene-Bruhier; Thomas Scheurer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Seventy-one important questions for the conservation of marine biodiversity.

Authors:  E C M Parsons; Brett Favaro; A Alonso Aguirre; Amy L Bauer; Louise K Blight; John A Cigliano; Melinda A Coleman; Isabelle M Côté; Megan Draheim; Stephen Fletcher; Melissa M Foley; Rebecca Jefferson; Miranda C Jones; Brendan P Kelaher; Carolyn J Lundquist; Julie-Beth McCarthy; Anne Nelson; Katheryn Patterson; Leslie Walsh; Andrew J Wright; William J Sutherland
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 6.560

5.  Priority Questions and Horizon Scanning for Conservation: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Salit Kark; William J Sutherland; Uri Shanas; Keren Klass; Hila Achisar; Tamar Dayan; Yael Gavrieli; Ronit Justo-Hanani; Yael Mandelik; Nir Orion; David Pargament; Michelle Portman; Orna Reisman-Berman; Uriel N Safriel; Gad Schaffer; Noa Steiner; Israel Tauber; Noam Levin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.