Literature DB >> 20557537

Factors influencing the infant feeding decision for socioeconomically deprived pregnant teenagers: the moral dimension.

Lisa Dyson1, Josephine M Green, Mary J Renfrew, Brian McMillan, Mike Woolridge.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The importance of breastfeeding-related health outcomes in reducing inequalities in health has been recognized as a National Health Service target to increase initiation rates especially among disadvantaged groups in England. This study examined the psychosocial factors influencing infant feeding intention among pregnant teenagers expecting their first baby and living in deprived urban areas in England.
METHODS: A mixed methods study, using a quantitative questionnaire based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour, was conducted in four English regions with predominantly white and Asian teenagers (n = 71). This method identified which of all known Theory of Planned Behaviour variables were the most important in influencing feeding intentions. Focus groups provided contextual insight into the meaning of these variables for white pregnant teenagers living in a northern English inner city (n = 17).
RESULTS: Moral norms were identified as the most predictive variable influencing teenage intention to formula feed or breastfeed. The likelihood that breastfeeding "will be embarrassing" was the only attitudinal belief rated as significantly important in influencing teenage intention to breastfeed. Three overarching themes emerged from the focus group data: "moral norms,""sexuality of the breast," and "self-esteem," with concerns relating to breastfeeding in public cutting across all themes.
CONCLUSIONS: Breastfeeding was viewed as a morally inappropriate behavior by most of these teenagers, with formula feeding being perceived as the appropriate behavior. Existing breastfeeding promotion activities are likely to continue to fail to reach teenagers experiencing deprivation in England in the absence of effective strategies to change the underlying negative moral norms toward breastfeeding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20557537     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00394.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  13 in total

1.  The impact of breastfeeding peer support for mothers aged under 25: a time series analysis.

Authors:  Sarah Scott; Catherine Pritchard; Lisa Szatkowski
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Promoting positive attitudes to breastfeeding: the development and evaluation of a theory-based intervention with school children involving a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Melanie Giles; Samantha Millar; Cherie Armour; Carol McClenahan; John Mallett; Barbara Stewart-Knox
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  An Integrative Review of Factors Influencing Breastfeeding in Adolescent Mothers.

Authors:  Supannee Kanhadilok; Jacqueline M McGrath
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2015

4.  Trade-offs underlying maternal breastfeeding decisions: a conceptual model.

Authors:  Kristin P Tully; Helen L Ball
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Prospective food diaries demonstrate breastfeeding characteristics in a UK birth cohort.

Authors:  Kate E C Grimshaw; Burcu Aksoy; Anna Palmer; Katharine Jenner; Erin M Oliver; Joe Maskell; Terri Kemp; Keith D Foote; Graham C Roberts; Basma Ellahi; Barrie M Margetts
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Antenatal breastfeeding intention, confidence and comfort in obese and non-obese primiparous Australian women: associations with breastfeeding duration.

Authors:  R M Newby; P S W Davies
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Healthcare providers' views on the acceptability of financial incentives for breastfeeding: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Barbara Whelan; Kate J Thomas; Patrice Van Cleemput; Heather Whitford; Mark Strong; Mary J Renfrew; Elaine Scott; Clare Relton
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Effect of Financial Incentives on Breastfeeding: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Clare Relton; Mark Strong; Kate J Thomas; Barbara Whelan; Stephen J Walters; Julia Burrows; Elaine Scott; Petter Viksveen; Maxine Johnson; Helen Baston; Julia Fox-Rushby; Nana Anokye; Darren Umney; Mary J Renfrew
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 16.193

9.  It's okay to breastfeed in public but….

Authors:  Athena Sheehan; Karleen Gribble; Virginia Schmied
Journal:  Int Breastfeed J       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.461

10.  Women's and peer supporters' experiences of an assets-based peer support intervention for increasing breastfeeding initiation and continuation: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Jenny Ingram; Gill Thomson; Debbie Johnson; Joanne L Clarke; Heather Trickey; Pat Hoddinott; Stephan U Dombrowski; Kate Jolly
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2020-03-21       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.