BACKGROUND: Anal stenosis is a debilitating condition that often is iatrogenic in cause. Various surgical procedures to manage this problem have been described. The present study evaluates the use of different anoplasty techniques in a series of 11 patients with anal stenosis. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to provide a stepwise algorithm for the anoplasty techniques used. METHODS: A series of 11 patients were evaluated for presenting symptoms, cause of anal stenosis, type of anoplasty used, complications and post-operative success in relieving symptoms. All operations were performed by one surgeon in three hospitals, and were followed up by the same surgeon and by a surgical registrar. RESULTS: The most common presenting symptoms were constipation and decreasing calibre of stool. The main causes of anal stenosis were previous surgery, neoplasia and fissure. Transverse closure, Y-V and diamond advancement flaps were used in an escalating manner to deal with increasing severity of stenosis. All 11 patients had some level of improvement in symptoms post-operatively. There were no long-term complications. CONCLUSION: Anoplasty is a safe and successful option in the treatment of anal stenosis, and this stepwise algorithm takes the guesswork out of choosing the most appropriate procedure for each patient.
BACKGROUND:Anal stenosis is a debilitating condition that often is iatrogenic in cause. Various surgical procedures to manage this problem have been described. The present study evaluates the use of different anoplasty techniques in a series of 11 patients with anal stenosis. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to provide a stepwise algorithm for the anoplasty techniques used. METHODS: A series of 11 patients were evaluated for presenting symptoms, cause of anal stenosis, type of anoplasty used, complications and post-operative success in relieving symptoms. All operations were performed by one surgeon in three hospitals, and were followed up by the same surgeon and by a surgical registrar. RESULTS: The most common presenting symptoms were constipation and decreasing calibre of stool. The main causes of anal stenosis were previous surgery, neoplasia and fissure. Transverse closure, Y-V and diamond advancement flaps were used in an escalating manner to deal with increasing severity of stenosis. All 11 patients had some level of improvement in symptoms post-operatively. There were no long-term complications. CONCLUSION: Anoplasty is a safe and successful option in the treatment of anal stenosis, and this stepwise algorithm takes the guesswork out of choosing the most appropriate procedure for each patient.