Literature DB >> 20556617

Comparison of modified Das De procedure with Du Vries procedure for traumatic peroneal tendon dislocation.

Tomohiro Tomihara1, Nagakazu Shimada, Gen Yoshida, Kunikazu Kaneda, Takeshi Matsuura, Shinji Satake.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For peroneal tendon dislocation, various surgical procedures have been described. Das De et al. reported good clinical results using retinaculum repair. However, their reports are limited to case series. We have simplified the Das De procedure since 1996. The purpose of this study is to investigate the clinical outcomes of our modified Das De procedure (MD) and compare these clinical outcomes to those of the Du Vries procedure (DV) that was performed in our hospital until 1996. PATIENTS: From 1996 to 2007, 19 patients were treated by MD and from 1988 to 1996, 15 patients were treated by DV.
RESULTS: A mean preoperative Ankle-Hindfoot Scale was 78.4 points (range: 65-84) in the MD group and 77.2 points (range: 67-87) in the DV group. A mean postoperative Ankle-Hindfoot Scale was 93.4 points in the MD group and 89.4 points in the DV group. Two patients (13.3%) in the DV group suffered postoperative peroneal tendon redislocation. In the MD group, there was no postoperative peroneal tendon redislocation or complication related to skin incision. In athletes, 80.0% in the MD group and 54.5% in the DV group were able to return to their previous sports. The mean duration to return to sports was 2.9 months in the MD group and 3.9 months in the DV group (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: MD provided similar or slightly better clinical outcomes with less complication as compared to DV. For athletes, the rate of return to sports was higher and the duration to return to sports was significantly shorter in the MD group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20556617     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-010-1136-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  6 in total

1.  Tendoscopic Double-Row Suture Bridge Peroneal Retinaculum Repair for Recurrent Dislocation of Peroneal Tendons in the Ankle.

Authors:  Akinobu Nishimura; Shigeto Nakazora; Naoya Ito; Aki Fukuda; Ko Kato; Akihiro Sudo
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2016-05-02

2.  Incidence of reoperation and wound dehiscence in patients treated for peroneal tendon dislocations: comparison between osteotomy versus soft tissue procedures.

Authors:  Youichi Yasui; Khushdeep S Vig; Ichiro Tonogai; Chun Wai Hung; Christopher D Murawski; Masato Takao; Hirotaka Kawano; John G Kennedy
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Surgical treatment options for chronic instability of the peroneal tendons: a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joline Lootsma; Sander Wuite; Harm Hoekstra; Giovanni A Matricali
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 4.  Non-operative treatment of peroneal tendon dislocations: A systematic review.

Authors:  Daniel Bakker; Jan B Schulte; Duncan E Meuffels; Tom M Piscaer
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-08-29

Review 5.  Return to sports and clinical outcomes in patients treated for peroneal tendon dislocation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Pim A D van Dijk; Arianna L Gianakos; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs; John G Kennedy
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  A false-pouch closure technique with an intact superior peroneal retinaculum for recurrent dislocation of the peroneal tendon.

Authors:  Tomohiro Matsui; Tsukasa Kumai; Yasushi Shinohara; Noriyuki Kanzaki; Koji Noguchi; Hirofumi Tanaka; Takeshi Sugimoto; Hiroki Yabiku; Ichiro Higashiyama
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2021-03-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.