Literature DB >> 20556409

The influence of post-meningitic obliteration and ossification of the cochlea on cochlear microphonics.

Magnus Teschner1, Th Lenarz, R-D Battmer.   

Abstract

Cochlear microphonics are electrical stimulus responses of the inner ear. They are generated by mechanical displacement of the hair cells caused by acoustic stimulation and can be recorded from the cochlear promontory via a needle electrode. In individuals with post-meningitic deafness, fibrous obliteration or ossification of the cochlea may occur. The aim of the present investigation was to establish whether obliteration or ossification leads to any alteration in the extent to which cochlear microphonics can be recorded (as compared with that in patients with a fluid-filled cochlea whose deafness was not post-meningitic), as an indication of changes in the mechanical displacement of the remaining hair cells. Cochlear microphonics in 15 individuals with proven obliteration or ossification of the cochlea were compared with those in 15 control subjects (deaf individuals whose hearing loss was not post-meningitic, and who had a fluid-filled cochlea). Our findings reveal no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the degree to which cochlear microphonics can be recorded. This study does not demonstrate evidence of a change in this property due to ossification or obliteration of the cochlea.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20556409     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-010-1294-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  9 in total

1.  [Indications for imaging the inner ear with CISS-MRI].

Authors:  R M Leuwer; H Bertuleit; O Wittkugel; H J Freitag
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.057

2.  The Nucleus Double Array cochlear implant for obliterated cochleae.

Authors:  T Lenarz; R D Battmer; C Frohne; A Büchner; J Parker
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2000

3.  AUDITORY NERVE IMPULSES.

Authors:  E G Wever; C W Bray
Journal:  Science       Date:  1930-02-21       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Principles of electric response audiometry.

Authors:  H Davis
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1976 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.547

5.  Cochlear microphonic potential recorded by transtympanic electrocochleography in normally-hearing and hearing-impaired ears.

Authors:  R Santarelli; P Scimemi; E Dal Monte; E Arslan
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.124

6.  Cochlear implantation after bacterial meningitis: the dangers of delay.

Authors:  A Dodds; E Tyszkiewicz; R Ramsden
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  Preoperative radiologic evaluation in cochlear implantation.

Authors:  T P Nikolopoulos; G M O'Donoghue; K L Robinson; I M Holland; C Ludman; K P Gibbin
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1997-11

8.  Hearing impairment in children after bacterial meningitis: incidence and resource implications.

Authors:  H Fortnum; A Davis
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1993-02

9.  Hearing alterations following meningitis. 1. Hearing improvement.

Authors:  U Rosenhall; A Kankkunen
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1980 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Round window electrocochleography just before cochlear implantation: relationship to word recognition outcomes in adults.

Authors:  Douglas C Fitzpatrick; Adam P Campbell; Adam T Campbell; Baishakhi Choudhury; Margaret T Dillon; Margaret P Dillon; Mathieu Forgues; Craig A Buchman; Oliver F Adunka
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.311

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.