Literature DB >> 20555377

On-ice sweat rate, voluntary fluid intake, and sodium balance during practice in male junior ice hockey players drinking water or a carbohydrate-electrolyte solution.

Matthew S Palmer1, Heather M Logan, Lawrence L Spriet.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the repeatability of hydration and sweat measurements taken during on-ice hockey practices with players drinking only water, and determined whether having only a carbohydrate-electrolyte solution (CES) to drink during practices decreased fluid intake or affected other hydration and (or) sweat measures. All testing was conducted on elite players of an Ontario Hockey League team (+/-SE; mean age, 17.6 +/- 0.3 years; mean height, 182.9 +/- 1.4 cm; mean body mass, 83.0 +/- 1.7 kg). Players were studied 3 times over the course of 6 weekly on-ice practices (+/-SE; mean playing time, 1.58 +/- 0.07 h; mean temperature, 11.4 +/- 0.8 degrees C; mean relative humidity, 52% +/- 3%). There was strong repeatability of the measured hydration and sweat parameters between 2 similar on-ice practices when players drank only water. Limiting the players to drinking only a CES (as opposed to water) did not decrease fluid intake during practice (+/-SE; mean CES intake, 0.72 +/- 0.07 L.h-1 vs. mean water intake, 0.82 +/- 0.08 L.h-1) or affect sweat rate (1.5 +/- 0.1 L.h-1 vs. 1.5 +/- 0.1 L.h-1), sweat sodium concentration (72.4 +/- 5.6 mmol.L-1 vs. 73.0 +/- 4.4 mmol.L-1), or percent body mass loss (1.1% +/- 0.2% vs. 0.9% +/- 0.2%). Drinking a CES also improved sodium balance (-2.1 +/- 0.2 g.h-1 vs. -2.6 +/- 0.3 g.h-1) and provided the players with a significant carbohydrate (43 +/- 4 g.h-1 vs. 0 +/- 0 g.h-1) during practice. In summary, a single field sweat test during similar on-ice hockey practices in male junior hockey players is sufficient to evaluate fluid and electrolyte balance. Also, a CES does not affect voluntary fluid intake during practice, compared with water, in these players. The CES provided some salt to offset the salt lost in sweat, and carbohydrate, which may help maintain physical and mental performance in the later stages of practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20555377     DOI: 10.1139/H10-027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab        ISSN: 1715-5312            Impact factor:   2.665


  7 in total

1.  Validity and reliability of the Horiba C-122 compact sodium analyzer in sweat samples of athletes.

Authors:  Eric D B Goulet; Tommy Dion; Étienne Myette-Côté
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  What do athletes drink during competitive sporting activities?

Authors:  Alison K Garth; Louise M Burke
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Interindividual variability in sweat electrolyte concentration in marathoners.

Authors:  Beatriz Lara; César Gallo-Salazar; Carlos Puente; Francisco Areces; Juan José Salinero; Juan Del Coso
Journal:  J Int Soc Sports Nutr       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 5.150

4.  Individual fluid plans versus ad libitum on hydration status in minor professional ice hockey players.

Authors:  Dawn M Emerson; Toni M Torres-McGehee; Charles C Emerson; Teri L LaSalle
Journal:  J Int Soc Sports Nutr       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 5.150

5.  A case report: Glycopyrrolate for treatment of exercise-induced hyperhidrosis.

Authors:  Matthew Negaard; Christopher Anthony; Daniel Bonthius; Matthew Jepson; Britt Marcussen; Daniel Pelzer; Andrew Peterson
Journal:  SAGE Open Med Case Rep       Date:  2017-08-08

Review 6.  Sweating Rate and Sweat Sodium Concentration in Athletes: A Review of Methodology and Intra/Interindividual Variability.

Authors:  Lindsay B Baker
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 7.  Fluid Balance in Team Sport Athletes and the Effect of Hypohydration on Cognitive, Technical, and Physical Performance.

Authors:  Ryan P Nuccio; Kelly A Barnes; James M Carter; Lindsay B Baker
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 11.136

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.