OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of therapeutic exercise before total hip replacement in frail elderly. DESIGN: A single-blind, randomized clinical pilot trial. SETTING: Outpatient physiotherapy department. SUBJECTS:Frail elderly with hip osteoarthritis awaiting total hip replacement. INTERVENTIONS: A short (3-6 weeks) tailor-made, therapeutic exercise programme was compared with usual care. MAIN MEASURES: Feasibility was assessed through patient satisfaction, adherence, occurrence of adverse events and the number of eligible non-volunteers. Preliminary preoperative effectiveness was assessed with performance and self-reported measures of pain, functioning, physical activity and quality of life. Postoperatively we measured functional recovery and length of hospital stay. RESULTS:Sixty-two eligible patients were approached of whom 21 (mean age 76 years) agreed to participate. Exercisers (n = 10), rated the intervention as very good 8.9 (8-10) (10-point rating scale). No serious adverse events occurred. Forty-one (66%) eligible patients did not participate, mainly because of logistic considerations, resulting in selection bias. The intervention group (trainings sessions participated 91%) showed relevant preoperative improvements on the chair-rise time (delta -2.9 seconds; 95% confidence interval (CI) -6.2 to 0.4) and timed-up-and-go (delta -4.4 seconds; 95% CI -9.3 to 0.5). Postoperatively, no significant differences were seen. CONCLUSIONS: A short, tailor-made, exercise programme is well tolerated and appreciated in elderly patients awaiting total hip replacement. However, a larger randomized clinical trial in the same setting is not warranted, because of the high number of eligible non-volunteers.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of therapeutic exercise before total hip replacement in frail elderly. DESIGN: A single-blind, randomized clinical pilot trial. SETTING:Outpatient physiotherapy department. SUBJECTS: Frail elderly with hip osteoarthritis awaiting total hip replacement. INTERVENTIONS: A short (3-6 weeks) tailor-made, therapeutic exercise programme was compared with usual care. MAIN MEASURES: Feasibility was assessed through patient satisfaction, adherence, occurrence of adverse events and the number of eligible non-volunteers. Preliminary preoperative effectiveness was assessed with performance and self-reported measures of pain, functioning, physical activity and quality of life. Postoperatively we measured functional recovery and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Sixty-two eligible patients were approached of whom 21 (mean age 76 years) agreed to participate. Exercisers (n = 10), rated the intervention as very good 8.9 (8-10) (10-point rating scale). No serious adverse events occurred. Forty-one (66%) eligible patients did not participate, mainly because of logistic considerations, resulting in selection bias. The intervention group (trainings sessions participated 91%) showed relevant preoperative improvements on the chair-rise time (delta -2.9 seconds; 95% confidence interval (CI) -6.2 to 0.4) and timed-up-and-go (delta -4.4 seconds; 95% CI -9.3 to 0.5). Postoperatively, no significant differences were seen. CONCLUSIONS: A short, tailor-made, exercise programme is well tolerated and appreciated in elderly patients awaiting total hip replacement. However, a larger randomized clinical trial in the same setting is not warranted, because of the high number of eligible non-volunteers.
Authors: U O Gustafsson; M J Scott; W Schwenk; N Demartines; D Roulin; N Francis; C E McNaught; J Macfie; A S Liberman; M Soop; A Hill; R H Kennedy; D N Lobo; K Fearon; O Ljungqvist Journal: World J Surg Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Peter S Kirk; Jeffrey F Friedman; David C Cron; Michael N Terjimanian; Stewart C Wang; Darrell A Campbell; Michael J Englesbe; Nicole L Werner Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2015-04-30 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Patricia Torres-Perez; María Álvarez-Satta; Mariano Arrazola; Larraitz Egaña; Manuel Moreno-Valladares; Jorge Villanua; Irune Ruiz; Nicolas Sampron; Ander Matheu Journal: Am J Cancer Res Date: 2021-06-15 Impact factor: 6.166
Authors: Miriam C Morey; Kenneth M Manning; Ying Guo; Shelley R McDonald; Mitchell T Heflin; Kathryn N Porter Starr; Richard Sloane; Nancy L Loyack; Sandhya Lagoo-Deenadayalan Journal: J Surg (Lisle) Date: 2018-07-31
Authors: Thomas J Hoogeboom; Ellen Oosting; Johanna E Vriezekolk; Cindy Veenhof; Petra C Siemonsma; Rob A de Bie; Cornelia H M van den Ende; Nico L U van Meeteren Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-05-31 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Rachael Powell; Neil W Scott; Anne Manyande; Julie Bruce; Claus Vögele; Lucie M T Byrne-Davis; Mary Unsworth; Christian Osmer; Marie Johnston Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2016-05-26