PURPOSE: To determine the genetic defect and to describe the clinical characteristics in a cohort of mainly nonconsanguineous cone-rod dystrophy (CRD) patients. METHODS: One hundred thirty-nine patients with diagnosed CRD were recruited. Ninety of them were screened for known mutations in ABCA4, and those carrying one or two mutations were excluded from further research. Genome-wide homozygosity mapping was performed in the remaining 108. Known genes associated with autosomal recessive retinal dystrophies located within a homozygous region were screened for mutations. Patients in whom a mutation was detected underwent further ophthalmic examination. RESULTS: Homozygous sequence variants were identified in eight CRD families, six of which were nonconsanguineous. The variants were detected in the following six genes: ABCA4, CABP4, CERKL, EYS, KCNV2, and PROM1. Patients carrying mutations in ABCA4, CERKL, and PROM1 had typical CRD symptoms, but a variety of retinal appearances on funduscopy, optical coherence tomography, and autofluorescence imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Homozygosity mapping led to the identification of new mutations in consanguineous and nonconsanguineous patients with retinal dystrophy. Detailed clinical characterization revealed a variety of retinal appearances, ranging from nearly normal to extensive retinal remodeling, retinal thinning, and debris accumulation. Although CRD was initially diagnosed in all patients, the molecular findings led to a reappraisal of the diagnosis in patients carrying mutations in EYS, CABP4, and KCNV2.
PURPOSE: To determine the genetic defect and to describe the clinical characteristics in a cohort of mainly nonconsanguineous cone-rod dystrophy (CRD) patients. METHODS: One hundred thirty-nine patients with diagnosed CRD were recruited. Ninety of them were screened for known mutations in ABCA4, and those carrying one or two mutations were excluded from further research. Genome-wide homozygosity mapping was performed in the remaining 108. Known genes associated with autosomal recessive retinal dystrophies located within a homozygous region were screened for mutations. Patients in whom a mutation was detected underwent further ophthalmic examination. RESULTS: Homozygous sequence variants were identified in eight CRD families, six of which were nonconsanguineous. The variants were detected in the following six genes: ABCA4, CABP4, CERKL, EYS, KCNV2, and PROM1. Patients carrying mutations in ABCA4, CERKL, and PROM1 had typical CRD symptoms, but a variety of retinal appearances on funduscopy, optical coherence tomography, and autofluorescence imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Homozygosity mapping led to the identification of new mutations in consanguineous and nonconsanguineous patients with retinal dystrophy. Detailed clinical characterization revealed a variety of retinal appearances, ranging from nearly normal to extensive retinal remodeling, retinal thinning, and debris accumulation. Although CRD was initially diagnosed in all patients, the molecular findings led to a reappraisal of the diagnosis in patients carrying mutations in EYS, CABP4, and KCNV2.
Authors: B Jeroen Klevering; Anita Blankenagel; Alessandra Maugeri; Frans P M Cremers; Carel B Hoyng; Klaus Rohrschneider Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: S Khaliq; A Hameed; M Ismail; K Anwar; B P Leroy; S Q Mehdi; A M Payne; S S Bhattacharya Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: A Maugeri; B J Klevering; K Rohrschneider; A Blankenagel; H G Brunner; A F Deutman; C B Hoyng; F P Cremers Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2000-08-24 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: B Wissinger; D Gamer; H Jägle; R Giorda; T Marx; S Mayer; S Tippmann; M Broghammer; B Jurklies; T Rosenberg; S G Jacobson; E C Sener; S Tatlipinar; C B Hoyng; C Castellan; P Bitoun; S Andreasson; G Rudolph; U Kellner; B Lorenz; G Wolff; C Verellen-Dumoulin; M Schwartz; F P Cremers; E Apfelstedt-Sylla; E Zrenner; R Salati; L T Sharpe; S Kohl Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2001-08-30 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Kaoru Fujinami; Jana Zernant; Ravinder K Chana; Genevieve A Wright; Kazushige Tsunoda; Yoko Ozawa; Kazuo Tsubota; Andrew R Webster; Anthony T Moore; Rando Allikmets; Michel Michaelides Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-10-11 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Rodrigo Matsui; Artur V Cideciyan; Sharon B Schwartz; Alexander Sumaroka; Alejandro J Roman; Malgorzata Swider; Wei Chieh Huang; Rebecca Sheplock; Samuel G Jacobson Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Nawajes A Mandal; Julie-Thu A Tran; Anisse Saadi; Abul K Rahman; Tuan-Phat Huynh; William H Klein; Jang-Hyeon Cho Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2012-11-08 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Anna M Siemiatkowska; Rob W J Collin; Anneke I den Hollander; Frans P M Cremers Journal: Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med Date: 2014-06-17 Impact factor: 6.915
Authors: Rehan S Shaikh; Peggy Reuter; Robert A Sisk; Tasleem Kausar; Mohsin Shahzad; Muhammad I Maqsood; Ateeq Yousif; Muhammad Ali; Saima Riazuddin; Bernd Wissinger; Zubair M Ahmed Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2014-07-23 Impact factor: 4.246