Literature DB >> 20554366

Residential mobility in the UK during pregnancy and infancy: are pregnant women, new mothers and infants 'unhealthy migrants'?

Helena Tunstall1, Kate Pickett, Sarah Johnsen.   

Abstract

People that move home within developed countries report, on average, better health than non-movers. Pregnant women, new mothers and infants are particularly mobile, but the limited evidence regarding the relationship between their mobility and health suggests they may not conform to the 'healthy migrant' effect. This paper examines the relationship between mobility and health among these groups in the UK, using logistic regression to analyse cross-sectional data for 18,197 families in the Millennium Cohort Study wave one. It compares health status variables among mobile and non-mobile families; describes mobile families' socio-demographic characteristics; explores associations between health outcomes, reasons for residential moves, and experiences of homelessness; and assesses the association between mobility and health care utilisation, social support and residential satisfaction. The paper concludes that mobile pregnant women, new mothers and infants do have poor health outcomes in comparison to non-movers, but this is primarily explained by their socio-demographic characteristics and the negative circumstances associated with a minority of their moves. Families that moved during pregnancy and infancy had worse self-rated health and depression among mothers, and lower birth weight and higher risk of accidents among infants, than non-movers. Mothers in mobile families were younger and had lower levels of education and owner-occupation than non-movers. After adjustment for socio-demographic characteristics mobility was weakly and non-significantly associated with most health variables with the exception of self-rated health and depression among mothers who moved for negative reasons (such as relationship breakdown or problems with neighbours), or had been homeless since birth. After adjustment mobile families had lower levels of most measures of health care utilisation compared to non-movers, but mothers did not report less frequent social contacts, and those that moved during infancy for positive reasons (such as wanting a better home or neighbourhood) had greater satisfaction with home and area. (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20554366     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.04.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  13 in total

Review 1.  Review of research on residential mobility during pregnancy: consequences for assessment of prenatal environmental exposures.

Authors:  Michelle L Bell; Kathleen Belanger
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 5.563

2.  Pregnant and moving: understanding residential mobility during pregnancy and in the first year of life using a prospective birth cohort.

Authors:  Frances B Saadeh; Melissa A Clark; Michelle L Rogers; Crystal D Linkletter; Maureen G Phipps; James F Padbury; Patrick M Vivier
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-02

3.  Association of residential mobility with child health: an analysis of the 2007 National Survey of Children's Health.

Authors:  Ashley Busacker; Laurin Kasehagen
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-04

4.  Antenatal depressive symptoms associated with specific life events and sources of social support among Italian women.

Authors:  Francesca Agostini; Erica Neri; Paola Salvatori; Sara Dellabartola; Laura Bozicevic; Fiorella Monti
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-05

5.  Childhood residential mobility and health in late adolescence and adulthood: findings from the West of Scotland Twenty-07 Study.

Authors:  D Brown; M Benzeval; V Gayle; S Macintyre; D O'Reilly; A H Leyland
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Difficult Life Events, Selective Migration and Spatial Inequalities in Mental Health in the UK.

Authors:  Helena Tunstall; Niamh K Shortt; Jamie R Pearce; Richard J Mitchell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Lifetime residential mobility history and self-rated health at midlife.

Authors:  Kuan-Chia Lin; Hui-Chuan Huang; Ya-Mei Bai; Pei-Chun Kuo
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 3.211

8.  The role of maternal stress in early pregnancy in the aetiology of gastroschisis: an incident case control study.

Authors:  Stephen R Palmer; Annette Evans; Hannah Broughton; Simon Huddart; Mark Drayton; Judith Rankin; Elizabeth S Draper; Alan Cameron; Shantini Paranjothy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Impact of London's road traffic air and noise pollution on birth weight: retrospective population based cohort study.

Authors:  Rachel B Smith; Daniela Fecht; John Gulliver; Sean D Beevers; David Dajnak; Marta Blangiardo; Rebecca E Ghosh; Anna L Hansell; Frank J Kelly; H Ross Anderson; Mireille B Toledano
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-12-05

10.  Mobility patterns and associated factors among pregnant internal migrant women in China: a cross-sectional study from a National Monitoring Survey.

Authors:  Ying Ji; Xiaoping Zhao; Zhili Wang; Shenglan Liu; Yang Shen; Chun Chang
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.