Literature DB >> 20553925

The effect of different harvest strategies on the nucleated cell yields of bone marrow collection.

Tso-Fu Wang1, Sung-Chao Chu, Shu-Huey Chen, Kuan-Po Huang, Yu-Chieh Su, Dian-Kun Li, Ming-Hwang Shyr, Chu-Yu Chang, Hsi-Hsiu Tsai, Ruey-Ho Kao.   

Abstract

To improve bone marrow (BM) harvest of the volunteer donors in our institute, we changed from the single-hole needle to the multi-side-hole needle after March 2002, and examined the midway total nucleated cell (TNC) counts during collection after September 2004. The aims of this retrospective study were to evaluate BM harvest yields obtained through different strategies and to examine the correlation between final and midway BM harvests. The distribution of BM harvesting by different strategies was 235 donors with single-hole needles (group A), 389 donors with 5-side-hole needles (group B), and 365 donors with 5-side-hole needles and midway TNC counts (group C). The nucleated cell density of the collected BM was significantly improved by modifying the harvest strategy (0.202 × 10(8)/mL in group A, 0.219 × 10(8)/mL in group B, and 0.250 × 10(8)/mL in group C; P < .001). The percentage of unacceptable TNC dose (<2 × 10(8)/kg) was also decreased in all 3 groups (to 5.9%, 3.6%, and 0%, respectively; P < .001). Multiple regression analysis revealed that donor weight, white blood cell count, and harvest strategy were positively correlated with BM TNC density (P < .001), whereas harvested BM volume was negatively correlated with TNC density (P < .001). On linear regression analysis, highly significant correlations were noted between midway and final TNC densities (r = 0.8774; P < .001) as well as between harvested BM volume and TNC count (r = 0.7937; P < .001). Changing the harvesting needle and checking the midway TNC count improved the harvest outcome.
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20553925     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2010.05.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 1083-8791            Impact factor:   5.742


  4 in total

Review 1.  Concise review: stem cell-based approaches to red blood cell production for transfusion.

Authors:  Siddharth Shah; Xiaosong Huang; Linzhao Cheng
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 6.940

2.  The Concentration of Total Nucleated Cells in Harvested Bone Marrow for Transplantation Has Decreased over Time.

Authors:  Nicole L Prokopishyn; Brent R Logan; Deidre M Kiefer; Jennifer A Sees; Pintip Chitphakdithai; Ibrahim A Ahmed; Paolo N Anderlini; Amer M Beitinjaneh; Christopher Bredeson; Jan Cerny; Saurabh Chhabra; Andrew Daly; Miguel Angel Diaz; Nosha Farhadfar; Haydar A Frangoul; Siddhartha Ganguly; Dennis A Gastineau; Usama Gergis; Gregory A Hale; Peiman Hematti; Rammurti T Kamble; Kimberly A Kasow; Hillard M Lazarus; Jane L Liesveld; Hemant S Murthy; Maxim Norkin; Richard F Olsson; Mona Papari; Bipin N Savani; Jeffrey Szer; Edmund K Waller; Baldeep Wirk; Jean A Yared; Michael A Pulsipher; Nirali N Shah; Galen E Switzer; Paul V O'Donnell; Dennis L Confer; Bronwen E Shaw
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell harvesting: technical advances and clinical utility.

Authors:  Olivier Hequet
Journal:  J Blood Med       Date:  2015-02-18

4.  Single- Versus Multiple-Site Harvesting Techniques for Bone Marrow Concentrate: Evaluation of Aspirate Quality and Pain.

Authors:  Kristin Oliver; Tariq Awan; Matthew Bayes
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-08-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.