Literature DB >> 20553867

Comparison of label-free biosensing in microplate, microfluidic, and spot-based affinity capture assays.

Charles J Choi1, Alysia R Belobraydich, Leo L Chan, Patrick C Mathias, Brian T Cunningham.   

Abstract

Using both experimental assays and fluid-dynamic finite element simulation models, we directly compared the achievable performance limits of four distinct assay configurations for label-free detection of an analyte from a test sample on a biosensor surface. The assay configurations studied in this work included a biosensor incorporated into the bottom surface of a microplate well and a microfluidic channel. For each configuration, we compared assay performance for the scenario in which the entire bottom surface of the fluid-handling vessel is coated with capture ligands with assay performance for the scenario in which the capture ligands are applied in the form of localized spots. As a model system, we used detection of the protein biomarker tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) using immobilized TNF-alpha capture antibody. Results show that the microfluidic assay format dramatically reduces the time required to establish a stable equilibrium. Spot-based assays are advantageous for microplate-based detection for reducing the time required for equilibrium sensor response. The results derived are generally applicable to any label-free biosensor technology and any ligand-analyte system with adjustable variables that include sensor mass density sensitivity, analyte-ligand adsorption/desorption rate constants, immobilized ligand density, flow channel geometry, flow rate, and spot size. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20553867     DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2010.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Biochem        ISSN: 0003-2697            Impact factor:   3.365


  9 in total

1.  Minimally invasive molecular delivery into the brain using optical modulation of vascular permeability.

Authors:  Myunghwan Choi; Taeyun Ku; Kyuha Chong; Jonghee Yoon; Chulhee Choi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  High-Q optical sensors for chemical and biological analysis.

Authors:  Matthew S Luchansky; Ryan C Bailey
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Recent Advances in Biosensing With Photonic Crystal Surfaces: A Review.

Authors:  B T Cunningham; M Zhang; Y Zhuo; L Kwon; C Race
Journal:  IEEE Sens J       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 3.301

Review 4.  Bioanalytical chemistry of cytokines--a review.

Authors:  Julie A Stenken; Andreas J Poschenrieder
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 6.558

Review 5.  Label-free cytokine micro- and nano-biosensing towards personalized medicine of systemic inflammatory disorders.

Authors:  Pengyu Chen; Nien-Tsu Huang; Meng-Ting Chung; Timothy T Cornell; Katsuo Kurabayashi
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 15.470

6.  Enhancing the detection limit of nanoscale biosensors via topographically selective functionalization.

Authors:  Mark A Lifson; Dhrubajyoti Basu Roy; Benjamin L Miller
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 7.  Last Advances in Silicon-Based Optical Biosensors.

Authors:  Adrián Fernández Gavela; Daniel Grajales García; Jhonattan C Ramirez; Laura M Lechuga
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 8.  Emerging Cytokine Biosensors with Optical Detection Modalities and Nanomaterial-Enabled Signal Enhancement.

Authors:  Manpreet Singh; Johnson Truong; W Brian Reeves; Jong-In Hahm
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 9.  Label-Free Biosensor Imaging on Photonic Crystal Surfaces.

Authors:  Yue Zhuo; Brian T Cunningham
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.576

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.