AIMS: To (i) compare the limits of detection of Bacillus anthracis spores in three soils (one Florida, one Texas, and one a commercial Garden product) by PCR using DNA extracted with five commercial extraction kits and (ii) examine if removing organic acids or adding an enrichment step utilizing a growth medium will improve the detection limits. METHODS AND RESULTS: Bacillus anthracis spores were added to soil aliquots and used immediately with a DNA extraction kit or pretreated to remove organics or incubated overnight in a selective growth medium before the DNA extraction was performed. Using hybridization and PCR assays for capC, pag and lef genes, 10(5) -10(6) B. anthracis spores were detected in untreated Florida soil, 10(4) -10(7) spores in untreated Texas soil and 10(6) -10(7) in Garden soil. Pretreatment did not reliably improve detection. DNA from untreated and pretreated soils was suitable for hybridization but not always for PCR. When 10(1) -10(2) spores were added to the soils and allowed to amplify in a growth medium selective for B. anthracis, DNA extracted using four methods reliably produced PCR acceptable DNA positive for the B. anthracis genes. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of DNA extracted with commercial kits appears to be influenced by the soil type and pretreatment. Yet, with an enrichment step added, four of five extraction methods produced PCR suitable DNA and detected ≤10(2) spores. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The enrichment step could enhance the detection of B. anthracis spores in soils and small samples contaminated with soil.
AIMS: To (i) compare the limits of detection of Bacillus anthracis spores in three soils (one Florida, one Texas, and one a commercial Garden product) by PCR using DNA extracted with five commercial extraction kits and (ii) examine if removing organic acids or adding an enrichment step utilizing a growth medium will improve the detection limits. METHODS AND RESULTS:Bacillus anthracis spores were added to soil aliquots and used immediately with a DNA extraction kit or pretreated to remove organics or incubated overnight in a selective growth medium before the DNA extraction was performed. Using hybridization and PCR assays for capC, pag and lef genes, 10(5) -10(6) B. anthracis spores were detected in untreated Florida soil, 10(4) -10(7) spores in untreated Texas soil and 10(6) -10(7) in Garden soil. Pretreatment did not reliably improve detection. DNA from untreated and pretreated soils was suitable for hybridization but not always for PCR. When 10(1) -10(2) spores were added to the soils and allowed to amplify in a growth medium selective for B. anthracis, DNA extracted using four methods reliably produced PCR acceptable DNA positive for the B. anthracis genes. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of DNA extracted with commercial kits appears to be influenced by the soil type and pretreatment. Yet, with an enrichment step added, four of five extraction methods produced PCR suitable DNA and detected ≤10(2) spores. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The enrichment step could enhance the detection of B. anthracis spores in soils and small samples contaminated with soil.
Authors: Anne M Mikelonis; Ahmed Abdel-Hady; Denise Aslett; Katherine Ratliff; Abderrahmane Touati; John Archer; Shannon Serre; Leroy Mickelsen; Sarah Taft; M W Calfee Journal: Environ Monit Assess Date: 2020-06-24 Impact factor: 2.513
Authors: Erin E Silvestri; David Feldhake; Dale Griffin; John Lisle; Tonya L Nichols; Sanjiv R Shah; Adin Pemberton; Frank W Schaefer Journal: J Microbiol Methods Date: 2016-08-18 Impact factor: 2.363