Literature DB >> 20553323

Diagnosis of congenital unicuspid aortic valve in adult population: the value and limitation of transesophageal echocardiography.

John W Chu1, Michael H Picard, Arvind K Agnihotri, Michael G Fitzsimons.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the accuracy of two-dimensional echocardiography (echo) in diagnosing unicuspid aortic valve (UAV) and to determine echo features that could improve the diagnosis.
METHOD: We reviewed transthoracic/transesophageal echoes (TTE/TEE) from our hospital database for adult patients who had aortic valve surgery with a preoperative echo diagnosis of UAV or equivocal diagnosis of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) BAV/UAV. Morphological characteristics of AV and ascending aortic dimensions were evaluated.
RESULTS: Nineteen patients were identified, 13 (11 Male, 2 Female, mean age 47 ± 10 years) had surgically confirmed diagnosis of UAV, six had BAV. The incidence of UAV was 2.6%. For diagnosing UAV, the sensitivity and specificity of TTE was 27% and 50% and those of TEE was 75% and 86%, respectively. For TTE, positive predictive value (PPV) was 60% and negative predictive value (NPV) was 20%. By TEE, PPV was 90% and the NPV was 67%. In UAV patients, 85% had severe aortic stenosis (mean gradient 45 ± 16 mmHg, AVA: 0.9 ± 0.2 cm²). 46% had ascending aorta aneurysm (mean aortic root, sinutubular junction, ascending aorta dimensions: 36 ± 3 mm, 31 ± 4 mm and 41 ± 8 mm). Patients with ascending aortic aneurysm were younger (41 ± 11 years vs. 52 ± 5 years, P < 0.05) All UAV were unicommissural with a posteriorly positioned commissural attachment, 69% were heavily calcified. Diagnostic accuracy was limited by quality of images, severity, and distribution of calcification.
CONCLUSION: TEE is the diagnostic modality of choice in UAV. Identifying several echo features may improve its diagnostic accuracy.
© 2010, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20553323     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2010.01209.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Echocardiography        ISSN: 0742-2822            Impact factor:   1.724


  10 in total

1.  Unicuspid unicommissural aortic valve: an extremely rare congenital anomaly.

Authors:  Sukhjeet Singh; Puneet Ghayal; Atish Mathur; Margaret Mysliwiec; Constantinos Lovoulos; Pallavi Solanki; Marc Klapholz; James Maher
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2015-06-01

2.  Bicuspid and unicuspid aortic valves: Different phenotypes of the same disease? Insight from the GenTAC Registry.

Authors:  Joseph M Krepp; Mary J Roman; Richard B Devereux; Adrienne Bruce; Siddharth K Prakash; Shaine A Morris; Dianna M Milewicz; Kathryn W Holmes; William Ravekes; Ralph V Shohet; Reed E Pyeritz; Cheryl L Maslen; Barbara L Kroner; Kim A Eagle; Liliana Preiss; Federico M Asch
Journal:  Congenit Heart Dis       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 2.007

3.  Incidental diagnosis of the unicuspid aortic valve with ascending aortic aneurysm in an asymptomatic adult.

Authors:  Seung-Dae Kang; Sang-Hoon Seol; Bo-Min Park; Dong-Kie Kim; Ki-Hun Kim; Doo-Il Kim; Jeong-Sook Seo; Dong-Soo Kim; Hyun-Kuk Kim; Jong-Woon Song
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2011-06-30

Review 4.  Considerations in the Surgical Management of Unicuspid Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Andrew J Gorton; Eric P Anderson; Jonathan A Reimer; Khaled Abdelhady; Raed Sawaqed; Malek G Massad
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 1.655

5.  Diagnostic accuracy study of routine echocardiography for bicuspid aortic valve: a retrospective study and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mathias Hillebrand; Dietmar Koschyk; Pia Ter Hark; Helke Schüler; Meike Rybczynski; Jürgen Berger; Amit Gulati; Alexander M Bernhardt; Christian Detter; Evaldas Girdauskas; Stefan Blankenberg; Yskert von Kodolitsch
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-08

6.  Symptomatic unicuspid aortic valve.

Authors:  Gohar Jamil; Walaa Said Dabbas; Mahmuneer Khan; Mujgan Jamil
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-12-17

7.  Congenital aortic stenosis due to unicuspid unicommissural aortic valve: a case report.

Authors:  Arnar B Ingason; Gunnlaugur Sigfusson; Bjarni Torfason
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 1.637

8.  Unicuspid Aortic Valve Presenting with Decompensated Critical Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Eunice Yang; Madeline Schiminger; Jose A Madrazo
Journal:  CASE (Phila)       Date:  2018-06-18

9.  Unicuspid Aortic Stenosis in a Patient with Turner Syndrome: A Case Report.

Authors:  Michael Essandoh; Karina Castellon-Larios; Alix Zuleta-Alarcon; Juan Guillermo Portillo; Juan A Crestanello
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-12-23

10.  Clinical impact of pathology-proven etiology of severely stenotic aortic valves on mid-term outcomes in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Shiro Miura; Katsumi Inoue; Hiraku Kumamaru; Takehiro Yamashita; Michiya Hanyu; Shinichi Shirai; Kenji Ando
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.