AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Micronucleus (MN) scoring was carried out in benign (fibroadenoma) and malignant (infiltrating ductal carcinoma) breast lesions to evaluate the role of MN as a biomarker in breast carcinomas. We also compared MN scores among different cytological grades of breast carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 31 archival cases of fibroadenoma (FA) and 40 cases of infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) were selected. The best May-Grünwald-Giemsa (MGG) stained fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) smear of each case was selected. The MN scoring was carried out independently by two observers on 1000 epithelial cells in oil immersion magnification (100× objective). The MN scores in FA and IDC were compared. The IDC cases were graded and the MN scores in different cytological grades of IDC were compared. RESULTS: The mean MN scores (± standard deviation) in FA and IDC were 0.6 (± 1.1) and 13.6 (± 12.8), respectively, which were significantly different (P < 0.0001). There were seven grade 1, 13 grade 2, and 20 grade 3 IDCs. The mean MN scores (± standard deviation) of grade 1, 2 and 3 IDC were 4.3 (± 2.3), 11.95 (± 9.2) and 21.1 (± 16.7), respectively. An analysis of variance (anova) test showed a significant difference in MN score between all the grades of IDC (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference between fibroadenoma and grade 1 IDC. The Pearson's correlation coefficient showed positive correlations between MN scoring in the different grades of IDC. CONCLUSIONS: MN scoring on routinely stained smears of IDCs was significantly higher than in fibroadenoma and was relatively easy, reliable and reproducible. As MN scoring of grade 1 IDC was similar to fibroadenoma, a larger study should be conducted to compare grade 1 IDC with other benign breast lesions.
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Micronucleus (MN) scoring was carried out in benign (fibroadenoma) and malignant (infiltrating ductal carcinoma) breast lesions to evaluate the role of MN as a biomarker in breast carcinomas. We also compared MN scores among different cytological grades of breast carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 31 archival cases of fibroadenoma (FA) and 40 cases of infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) were selected. The best May-Grünwald-Giemsa (MGG) stained fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) smear of each case was selected. The MN scoring was carried out independently by two observers on 1000 epithelial cells in oil immersion magnification (100× objective). The MN scores in FA and IDC were compared. The IDC cases were graded and the MN scores in different cytological grades of IDC were compared. RESULTS: The mean MN scores (± standard deviation) in FA and IDC were 0.6 (± 1.1) and 13.6 (± 12.8), respectively, which were significantly different (P < 0.0001). There were seven grade 1, 13 grade 2, and 20 grade 3 IDCs. The mean MN scores (± standard deviation) of grade 1, 2 and 3 IDC were 4.3 (± 2.3), 11.95 (± 9.2) and 21.1 (± 16.7), respectively. An analysis of variance (anova) test showed a significant difference in MN score between all the grades of IDC (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference between fibroadenoma and grade 1 IDC. The Pearson's correlation coefficient showed positive correlations between MN scoring in the different grades of IDC. CONCLUSIONS: MN scoring on routinely stained smears of IDCs was significantly higher than in fibroadenoma and was relatively easy, reliable and reproducible. As MN scoring of grade 1 IDC was similar to fibroadenoma, a larger study should be conducted to compare grade 1 IDC with other benign breast lesions.