Literature DB >> 20553131

Comparative soft and hard tissue responses to titanium and polymer healing abutments.

Theofilos Koutouzis1, Joseph Richardson, Tord Lundgren.   

Abstract

Limited information exists regarding soft tissue and hard tissue responses to abutments with different material composition. The aim of this study is to evaluate soft and hard tissue responses to titanium and polymer healing abutments over a 3-month period. Sixteen patients were included in this prospective trial. Implants were provisionalized with either titanium or polymer healing abutments. Changes of marginal bone level and soft tissue dimensions were recorded at implant installation and at 3 months.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2010        PMID： 20553131     DOI： 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-09-00102.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Implantol        ISSN： 0160-6972            Impact factor:   1.779


  12 in total

1.  Peri-implant soft tissue integration in humans - influence of materials: A study protocol for a randomised controlled trial and a pilot study results.

Authors:  Manon Borie; Geoffrey Lecloux; Dieter Bosshardt; Alejandro Barrantes; Håvard Jostein Haugen; France Lambert; Miljana Bacevic
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2020-08-15

2.  Comparative evaluation of the wear resistance of two different implant abutment materials after cyclic loading - An in vitro study.

Authors:  Maniamuthu Ragupathi; Vallabh Mahadevan; N S Azhagarasan; Hariharan Ramakrishnan; S Jayakrishnakumar
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2020-11-26

3.  Effects of Different pH-Values on the Nanomechanical Surface Properties of PEEK and CFR-PEEK Compared to Dental Resin-Based Materials.

Authors:  Shuai Gao; Shanshan Gao; Baohua Xu; Haiyang Yu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 4.  PEEK with Reinforced Materials and Modifications for Dental Implant Applications.

Authors:  Fitria Rahmitasari; Yuichi Ishida; Kosuke Kurahashi; Takashi Matsuda; Megumi Watanabe; Tetsuo Ichikawa
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-15

5.  Determination of Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) mechanical properties as a denture material.

Authors:  Saja A Muhsin; Paul V Hatton; Anthony Johnson; Nuno Sereno; Duncan J Wood
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2019-03-13

Review 6.  Strategies to Reduce Biofilm Formation in PEEK Materials Applied to Implant Dentistry-A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Renata Scheeren Brum; Luiza Gomes Labes; Cláudia Ângela Maziero Volpato; César Augusto Magalhães Benfatti; Andrea de Lima Pimenta
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-16

Review 7.  Review on Development and Dental Applications of Polyetheretherketone-Based Biomaterials and Restorations.

Authors:  Ludan Qin; Shuo Yao; Jiaxin Zhao; Chuanjian Zhou; Thomas W Oates; Michael D Weir; Junling Wu; Hockin H K Xu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Antibacterial activity, bio-compatibility and osteogenic differentiation of graphene oxide coating on 3D-network poly-ether-ether-ketone for orthopaedic implants.

Authors:  Cui Guo; Ran Lu; Xin Wang; Su Chen
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 3.896

9.  Clinical evaluation of performance of single unit polyetheretherketone crown restoration-a pilot study.

Authors:  Kavishma Sulaya; Satyabodh S Guttal
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2020-01-27

10.  Cytocompatibility of Titanium, Zirconia and Modified PEEK after Surface Treatment Using UV Light or Non-Thermal Plasma.

Authors:  Linna Guo; Ralf Smeets; Lan Kluwe; Philip Hartjen; Mike Barbeck; Claudio Cacaci; Martin Gosau; Anders Henningsen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 5.923
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.