INTRODUCTION: The most suitable immunohistochemical criterion to identify basal-like breast carcinomas (BLBC), a molecular subgroup of breast cancer associated with poor prognosis, is the triple negative phenotype along with CK5 and/or EGFR immunoreactivity. However, several putative basal markers have been suggested as alternatives to identify BLBC with more accuracy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The expression of CK5, EGFR, P-cadherin, CK14, Vimentin and p63 were evaluated in 462 invasive breast carcinomas to determine their sensitivity and specificity for BLBC identification. RESULTS: P-cadherin and CK5 showed higher sensitivity values, while EGFR, Vimentin and CK14 were the most specific markers. The combination of CK5 with P-cadherin, Vimentin or CK14 proved to be a reliable option for distinguishing the basal phenotype, compared to the "gold standard" pair CK5/EGFR. Furthermore, P-cadherin was still able to recognize a large number of putative BLBC among the "unclassified" group (ER-/PR-/HER2-/CK5-/EGFR-). CONCLUSIONS: P-cadherin, Vimentin and CK14 can recognize BLBC already identified in triple negative/ CK5 and/or EGFR+ tumors, and due to P-cadherin sensitivity for BLBC identification this marker can reliably recruit a large number of breast carcinomas with basal phenotype among immunohistochemistry triple negative/ CK5 and/or EGFR - pool of tumors. Although they need GEP validation, our results can introduce the idea of these markers as additional options in the daily workup of breast pathology laboratories to identify BLBC.
INTRODUCTION: The most suitable immunohistochemical criterion to identify basal-like breast carcinomas (BLBC), a molecular subgroup of breast cancer associated with poor prognosis, is the triple negative phenotype along with CK5 and/or EGFR immunoreactivity. However, several putative basal markers have been suggested as alternatives to identify BLBC with more accuracy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The expression of CK5, EGFR, P-cadherin, CK14, Vimentin and p63 were evaluated in 462 invasive breast carcinomas to determine their sensitivity and specificity for BLBC identification. RESULTS: P-cadherin and CK5 showed higher sensitivity values, while EGFR, Vimentin and CK14 were the most specific markers. The combination of CK5 with P-cadherin, Vimentin or CK14 proved to be a reliable option for distinguishing the basal phenotype, compared to the "gold standard" pair CK5/EGFR. Furthermore, P-cadherin was still able to recognize a large number of putative BLBC among the "unclassified" group (ER-/PR-/HER2-/CK5-/EGFR-). CONCLUSIONS: P-cadherin, Vimentin and CK14 can recognize BLBC already identified in triple negative/ CK5 and/or EGFR+ tumors, and due to P-cadherin sensitivity for BLBC identification this marker can reliably recruit a large number of breast carcinomas with basal phenotype among immunohistochemistry triple negative/ CK5 and/or EGFR - pool of tumors. Although they need GEP validation, our results can introduce the idea of these markers as additional options in the daily workup of breast pathology laboratories to identify BLBC.
Authors: Jennifer L Dine; Ciara C O'Sullivan; Donna Voeller; Yoshimi E Greer; Kathryn J Chavez; Catherine M Conway; Sarah Sinclair; Brandon Stone; Laleh Amiri-Kordestani; Anand S Merchant; Stephen M Hewitt; Seth M Steinberg; Sandra M Swain; Stanley Lipkowitz Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2016-01-12 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: André Filipe Vieira; Maria Rita Dionísio; Madalena Gomes; Jorge F Cameselle-Teijeiro; Manuela Lacerda; Isabel Amendoeira; Fernando Schmitt; Joana Paredes Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2017-01-13 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Jacob Ulirsch; Cheng Fan; George Knafl; Ming Jing Wu; Brett Coleman; Charles M Perou; Theresa Swift-Scanlan Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2012-12-13 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Steven T Sizemore; Gina M Sizemore; Christine N Booth; Cheryl L Thompson; Paula Silverman; Gurkan Bebek; Fadi W Abdul-Karim; Stefanie Avril; Ruth A Keri Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2014-05-22 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: André Albergaria; Carlos Resende; Ana Rita Nobre; Ana Sofia Ribeiro; Bárbara Sousa; José Carlos Machado; Raquel Seruca; Joana Paredes; Fernando Schmitt Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-02-06 Impact factor: 3.240