Literature DB >> 20552267

Quantum dots for multimodal molecular imaging of angiogenesis.

Willem J M Mulder1, Gustav J Strijkers, Klaas Nicolay, Arjan W Griffioen.   

Abstract

Quantum dots exhibit unique optical properties for bioimaging purposes. We have previously developed quantum dots with a paramagnetic and functionalized coating and have shown their potential for molecular imaging purposes. In the current mini-review we summarize the synthesis procedure, the in vitro testing and, importantly, the in vivo application for multimodal molecular imaging of tumor angiogenesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20552267      PMCID: PMC2911527          DOI: 10.1007/s10456-010-9177-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angiogenesis        ISSN: 0969-6970            Impact factor:   9.596


Introduction

Quantum dots (QDs), semiconductor nanocrystals, have exceptional optical properties, which make them ideally suited for a number of applications in biomedical imaging, with several important advantages over fluorescent dye-molecules [1, 2]. The absorption spectrum of a QD is very broad, while the emission spectrum is narrow. The exact optical properties of QDs can be tuned by a precise control of composition and size, allowing the synthesis of QDs with emission wavelengths spanning from the near UV to near infrared (NIR), making QDs particularly suitable for multiplexed imaging [3]. Importantly for biological applications, the surface of QDs can be easily modified to render them water-soluble and biocompatible as well as to allow the introduction of additional functionalities and to make them target-specific. Dubertret and colleagues were the first to apply quantum dots to a living organism (Xenopus embryos) for in vivo imaging purposes [4]. To that end they encapsulated the QD nanocrystals in phospholipid micelles. Previously, we modified their procedure to create QD-based nanoparticles that can be detected by optical techniques as well as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Using this approach we have created QD based nanoparticles that specifically bind activated endothelial cells to image ongoing angiogenesis [5, 6].

Synthesis of paramagnetic QD-micelles

The original procedure involves mixing of QDs that are coated with hydrophobic capping molecules with an excess of PEGylated phospholipids (PEG-lipids) and Gd-DTPA labeled lipids (Gd-DTPA-DSA) in chloroform. Upon evaporation of the solvent, a mixed film containing the lipids and QDs is formed. Hydrating and heating this film results in the formation of paramagnetic micelles that contain a QD in their core. This procedure results in the formation of a relatively large fraction of aggregated QDs coated by the PEG-lipids. To increase the yield of paramagnetic micelles with a single QD core we modified the procedure as illustrated in Fig. 1. The new method involves slow infusion of the chloroform QD/lipid mixture into hot water, which results in the formation of chloroform-in-water emulsions that swiftly form micelles as chloroform evaporates. The resulting mix of QD core micelles and empty micelles is separated by centrifugation methods. The relaxivity of purified paramagnetic QD-micelles is approximately 2,000 mM−1s−1 (per mM nanoparticles) at a clinically relevant field strength of 1.41 T, which makes them attractive for molecular MRI purposes [7, 8].
Fig. 1

Schematic representation of the synthesis of QDs with a paramagnetic micellar coating. QDs and lipids in chloroform are slowly infused in hot water that, via chloroform-in-water emulsions, swiftly form micelles when chloroform evaporates, some of which have a QD core

Schematic representation of the synthesis of QDs with a paramagnetic micellar coating. QDs and lipids in chloroform are slowly infused in hot water that, via chloroform-in-water emulsions, swiftly form micelles when chloroform evaporates, some of which have a QD core By the inclusion of maleimide functionalized PEG-lipids (Mal-PEG-lipid), the paramagnetic QD-micelles can be functionalized via a sulfhydryl-maleimide coupling method. Using this strategy, we have shown the conjugation of αvβ3-integrin specific cyclic RGD peptides [5, 9] and phosphatidylserine specific Annexin A5 proteins [6] to the paramagnetic QD-micelles, but also the conjugation of E-selectin specific antibodies to paramagnetic liposomes [10].

In vitro targeting and imaging

To assess the biological specificity of the RGD and Annexin A5 conjugated paramagnetic QD-micelles (abbreviated as RGD-pQD and A5-pQD, respectively) human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) and Jurkat cells were used for in vitro testing, respectively. Growth factor activated and proliferating HUVEC overexpress the αvβ3-integrin, while Jurkat cells exposed to anti-Fas become apoptotic and expose the negatively charged phospholipid phosphatidylserine (PS) at the outer layer of the cell membrane. Both markers are known to be expressed in angiogenic blood vessels. In Fig. 2a a T1-weighted MR image of loosely packed cells, 1.5 million per pellet, is shown. The pellet of cells incubated with the targeted RGD-pQDs appeared much brighter than those that were incubated with non-targeted pQDs or that were not incubated with contrast agent. A fluorescence microscopy image of HUVEC that had been incubated with green emitting RGD-pQDs is depicted in Fig. 2a (right) and showed the nanoparticles to be internalized, at a perinuclear location (inset). In Fig. 2b Jurkat cell pellets are shown that were illuminated with 254 nm UV light. The green emitting cell pellet originating from the A5-pQDs incubated PS expressing cells can be clearly distinguished from the control cell pellets.
Fig. 2

In vitro targeting and imaging with QD-micelles. a, left T1-weighted MRI image of cells that were incubated with RGD-pQDs, pQDS, or without contrast agent. a, right Fluorescence microscopy of HUVEC incubated with RGD-pQDs. b Pellets of Jurkatt cells of different incubations illuminated with 254 nm UV light. From left to right: [1] Control cells. [2] Apoptotic cells treated with EDTA to remove Ca2+, which prevents binding [3] vital cells, and [4] apoptotic cells, all incubated with Annexin A5 functionalized QD-micelles revealed the highest uptake in situation [4]

In vitro targeting and imaging with QD-micelles. a, left T1-weighted MRI image of cells that were incubated with RGD-pQDs, pQDS, or without contrast agent. a, right Fluorescence microscopy of HUVEC incubated with RGD-pQDs. b Pellets of Jurkatt cells of different incubations illuminated with 254 nm UV light. From left to right: [1] Control cells. [2] Apoptotic cells treated with EDTA to remove Ca2+, which prevents binding [3] vital cells, and [4] apoptotic cells, all incubated with Annexin A5 functionalized QD-micelles revealed the highest uptake in situation [4]

Multimodality molecular imaging of tumor angiogenesis

To evaluate the in vivo potential of RGD-pQDs we designed a study where different groups of tumor bearing mice were imaged in vivo with fluorescence intravital microscopy (IVM), MRI, or whole body fluorescence imaging (Fig. 3, left) [9]. IVM was used to monitor nanoparticle binding to the tumor vasculature in real-time. We observed labeling of tumor blood vessels within 5–10 min after the administration of RGD-pQDS. A typical fluorescence image is depicted in Fig. 3. Labeling of endothelial cells in the tumor vasculature by RGD-pQDs was found as far as 1 cm from the tumor periphery, indicative for a widespread activation of the blood vessels in close proximity of cancerous tissue. No endothelial cell labeling of blood vessels in the hind limb of the animals and of blood vessels in the ears of the animals was observed.
Fig. 3

Multimodal molecular imaging of tumor angiogenesis using QD-micelles. (Top) Intravital microscopy of microvessels in tumor-bearing mice after intravenous injection of αvβ3-specific and paramagnetic QD-micelles. (Middle) T1-weighted MR images 45 min after the injection of the nanoparticles in a mouse bearing a subcutaneous tumor. The colored pixels in the tumor highlight the location of the MR-visible QD-micelles, predominantly in the rim of the tumor. (Bottom) Fluorescence image of a mouse, inoculated with a tumor in the kidney, following intravenous administration

Multimodal molecular imaging of tumor angiogenesis using QD-micelles. (Top) Intravital microscopy of microvessels in tumor-bearing mice after intravenous injection of αvβ3-specific and paramagnetic QD-micelles. (Middle) T1-weighted MR images 45 min after the injection of the nanoparticles in a mouse bearing a subcutaneous tumor. The colored pixels in the tumor highlight the location of the MR-visible QD-micelles, predominantly in the rim of the tumor. (Bottom) Fluorescence image of a mouse, inoculated with a tumor in the kidney, following intravenous administration MRI was performed on a different group of animals that were intravenously injected with RGD-pQD. A high resolution T1-weighted image, acquired 45 min after contrast agent injection, revealed angiogenic activity to be mainly found at the rim of the tumor, which corresponds with the regions of the tumor with highest angiogenic activity. Lastly, whole body fluorescence imaging was employed to visualize angiogenesis in nude mice that grew a tumor in their kidney (Fig. 3, bottom). This technique has a higher sensitivity and temporal resolution than MRI and thus allows faster screening of nanoparticle targeting, albeit with less spatial information than is the case for MRI. Altogether, IVM, MRI and fluorescence imaging are complementary imaging modalities that, when combined with our nanoparticle, can provide information about angiogenesis at the microscopic level of superficial blood vessels (IVM), at the whole mouse level with high sensitivity and temporal resolution (fluorescence imaging), as well as three dimensional information of the inside of the mouse and tumor (MRI).

Discussion and conclusion

QDs represent an excellent tool for multimodal molecular imaging of angiogenesis. It was recently demonstrated that these nanocrystals can be used to image the tumor microenvironment and that differently sized quantum dots can be used to assess the permeability of the tumor microvasculature [11]. Subsequent to the lipid-based QD platform we introduced, Oostendorp and colleagues demonstrated the functionalization of QDs with paramagnetic dendritic wedges and CD13 specific cNGR peptides to allow MR molecular imaging of tumor angiogenesis [12] as well as angiogenesis after myocardial infarction [13]. The fluorescence properties of the QDs were exploited to validate their findings with ex vivo two-photon laser scanning microscopy, which showed the QDs to be co-localized with endothelial cells. In addition to labeling QDs for MRI, studies have shown the value of the combination with positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. Cai and colleagues used radiolabeled and RGD peptide functionalized QDs to accomplish molecular imaging of tumor angiogenesis [14], while Chen et al. demonstrated the same using radiolabeled QDs that were functionalized with vascular endothelial growth factor [15]. Since our nanoparticle platform contains DTPA functionalized lipids the inclusion of a radiolabel should be relatively straightforward and may be introduced as a third label to additionally allow PET imaging. Interestingly, the flexibility of the QD-micelle platform also allows the possibility to include therapeutics [16] or additional targeting moieties to enhance the specificity of targeting, as was recently demonstrated by Kluza et al. for a liposomal nanoparticle [17]. In conclusion this mini-review presented the development of paramagnetic QD-micelles for MR and optical based molecular imaging. The ease of preparation and flexibility, as well as their use as a scaffold that is representative of other nanocrystals make them fruitful tools for biomedical imaging purposes. Their application may be extended to other imaging modalities, to other disease processes than angiogenesis, as well as for drug targeting purposes.
  16 in total

1.  Long-term multiple color imaging of live cells using quantum dot bioconjugates.

Authors:  Jyoti K Jaiswal; Hedi Mattoussi; J Matthew Mauro; Sanford M Simon
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2002-12-02       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 2.  Quantum dots for live cells, in vivo imaging, and diagnostics.

Authors:  X Michalet; F F Pinaud; L A Bentolila; J M Tsay; S Doose; J J Li; G Sundaresan; A M Wu; S S Gambhir; S Weiss
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-01-28       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Quantum dot bioconjugates for imaging, labelling and sensing.

Authors:  Igor L Medintz; H Tetsuo Uyeda; Ellen R Goldman; Hedi Mattoussi
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 43.841

4.  Quantum dots with a paramagnetic coating as a bimodal molecular imaging probe.

Authors:  Willem J M Mulder; Rolf Koole; Ricardo J Brandwijk; Gert Storm; Patrick T K Chin; Gustav J Strijkers; Celso de Mello Donegá; Klaas Nicolay; Arjan W Griffioen
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 11.189

5.  Molecular imaging of tumor angiogenesis using alphavbeta3-integrin targeted multimodal quantum dots.

Authors:  Willem J M Mulder; Karolien Castermans; Judy R van Beijnum; Mirjam G A Oude Egbrink; Patrick T K Chin; Zahi A Fayad; Clemens W G M Löwik; Eric L Kaijzel; Ivo Que; Gert Storm; Gustav J Strijkers; Arjan W Griffioen; Klaas Nicolay
Journal:  Angiogenesis       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 9.596

6.  Quantitative molecular magnetic resonance imaging of tumor angiogenesis using cNGR-labeled paramagnetic quantum dots.

Authors:  Marlies Oostendorp; Kim Douma; Tilman M Hackeng; Anouk Dirksen; Mark J Post; Marc A M J van Zandvoort; Walter H Backes
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Synergistic targeting of alphavbeta3 integrin and galectin-1 with heteromultivalent paramagnetic liposomes for combined MR imaging and treatment of angiogenesis.

Authors:  Ewelina Kluza; Daisy W J van der Schaft; Petra A I Hautvast; Willem J M Mulder; Kevin H Mayo; Arjan W Griffioen; Gustav J Strijkers; Klaas Nicolay
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 11.189

Review 8.  Lipid-based nanoparticles for contrast-enhanced MRI and molecular imaging.

Authors:  Willem J M Mulder; Gustav J Strijkers; Geralda A F van Tilborg; Arjan W Griffioen; Klaas Nicolay
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.044

9.  Molecular magnetic resonance imaging of myocardial angiogenesis after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Marlies Oostendorp; Kim Douma; Allard Wagenaar; Jos M G M Slenter; Tilman M Hackeng; Marc A M J van Zandvoort; Mark J Post; Walter H Backes
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 10.  Micelles from lipid derivatives of water-soluble polymers as delivery systems for poorly soluble drugs.

Authors:  Anatoly N Lukyanov; Vladimir P Torchilin
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2004-05-07       Impact factor: 15.470

View more
  9 in total

1.  An activatable multimodal/multifunctional nanoprobe for direct imaging of intracellular drug delivery.

Authors:  Rajendra N Mitra; Mona Doshi; Xiaolei Zhang; Jessica C Tyus; Niclas Bengtsson; Steven Fletcher; Brent D G Page; James Turkson; Andre J Gesquiere; Patrick T Gunning; Glenn A Walter; Swadeshmukul Santra
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  State-of-the-Art Methods for Evaluation of Angiogenesis and Tissue Vascularization: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Michael Simons; Kari Alitalo; Brian H Annex; Hellmut G Augustin; Craig Beam; Bradford C Berk; Tatiana Byzova; Peter Carmeliet; William Chilian; John P Cooke; George E Davis; Anne Eichmann; M Luisa Iruela-Arispe; Eli Keshet; Albert J Sinusas; Christiana Ruhrberg; Y Joseph Woo; Stefanie Dimmeler
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 17.367

3.  Hybrid magnetic nanostructures (MNS) for magnetic resonance imaging applications.

Authors:  Mrinmoy De; Stanley S Chou; Hrushikesh M Joshi; Vinayak P Dravid
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2011-08-06       Impact factor: 15.470

4.  PEG coated biocompatible cadmium chalcogenide quantum dots for targeted imaging of cancer cells.

Authors:  Aby Cheruvathoor Poulose; Srivani Veeranarayanan; M Sheikh Mohamed; Sreejith Raveendran; Yutaka Nagaoka; Yasuhiko Yoshida; Toru Maekawa; D Sakthi Kumar
Journal:  J Fluoresc       Date:  2012-01-08       Impact factor: 2.217

5.  Accumulation of nano-sized particles in a murine model of angiogenesis.

Authors:  Thomas R Wittenborn; Esben K U Larsen; Thomas Nielsen; Louise M Rydtoft; Line Hansen; Jens V Nygaard; Thomas Vorup-Jensen; Jørgen Kjems; Michael R Horsman; Niels Chr Nielsen
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 3.575

6.  Passive tumor targeting and imaging by using mercaptosuccinic acid-coated near-infrared quantum dots.

Authors:  Guimiao Lin; Xiaomei Wang; Feng Yin; Ken-Tye Yong
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2015-01-06

7.  Hybrid nanoparticles improve targeting to inflammatory macrophages through phagocytic signals.

Authors:  Vaishali Bagalkot; Marcus A Badgeley; Thomas Kampfrath; Jeffrey A Deiuliis; Sanjay Rajagopalan; Andrei Maiseyeu
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 9.776

8.  Peptide-functionalized quantum dots for potential applications in the imaging and treatment of obesity.

Authors:  Ntevheleni Thovhogi; Nicole Remaliah Samantha Sibuyi; Martin Opiyo Onani; Mervin Meyer; Abram Madimabe Madiehe
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2018-04-27

Review 9.  Spatial heterogeneity of nanomedicine investigated by multiscale imaging of the drug, the nanoparticle and the tumour environment.

Authors:  Josanne Sophia de Maar; Alexandros Marios Sofias; Tiffany Porta Siegel; Rob J Vreeken; Chrit Moonen; Clemens Bos; Roel Deckers
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 11.556

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.