Literature DB >> 20551759

History of hysterectomy: a significant problem for colonoscopists that is not present in patients who have had sigmoid colectomy.

Kelly A Garrett1, James Church.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: During colonoscopy, it is often difficult to traverse the sigmoid colon in patients who have had a hysterectomy, presumably due to postsurgical pelvic adhesions. We performed this study to document this difficulty and to determine whether sigmoid colectomy prevents it.
METHODS: Data were acquired from a single endoscopist's prospective database. Colonoscopies performed in women were grouped according to history of hysterectomy and/or sigmoid colectomy. Groups were compared for colonoscopy completion rate, medication used, and time of examination. Participation of fellows and rate of complications were recorded. Patients with a history of abdominal-perineal resection of the rectum were excluded.
RESULTS: From 1989 to 2006, a total of 4116 colonoscopies were performed in women: 993 had undergone hysterectomy (24.1%), of whom 108 (10.9%) had also undergone sigmoid colectomy. There were 3123 exams in woman who had their uterus (75.9%); 320 (10.2%) had undergone sigmoid colectomy. Patients who still had a sigmoid colon but had a history of hysterectomy had significantly lower colonoscopy completion rates (89.2%) and significantly longer mean examination time (28.9 +/- 12.3 minutes), and more of them required sedation with benzodiazepines (88.7%) than the other groups (P < .05). Fellow participation increased time of colonoscopy and complications were more frequent in patients with hysterectomy.
CONCLUSION: Posthysterectomy adhesions to the sigmoid colon make colonoscopy more difficult and more painful. These adverse effects are not present in hysterectomized women who have undergone sigmoid resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20551759     DOI: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181d569cc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  7 in total

1.  The use of ancillary techniques to aid colonoscope insertion.

Authors:  Xhileta Xhaja; James Church
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Colorectal cancer screening and prevention in women.

Authors:  Lyssa Chacko; Carole Macaron; Carol A Burke
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-01-18       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Colonoscopic Perforations.

Authors:  Vinay Rai; Nitin Mishra
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-12-19

4.  Treating symptomatic adhesions to the sigmoid colon: colectomy improves quality of life.

Authors:  Awad Jarrar; James Church
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Variation in caecal intubation rates between screening and symptomatic patients.

Authors:  Nalin Nagrath; Perminder S Phull
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.623

6.  Triage of colonoscopies: open access endoscopy versus outpatient consultation with a gastroenterologist.

Authors:  C D Wichers; N C M van Heel; F Ter Borg; M A van Herwaarden
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2014-09-17

7.  Effect of Previous Gastrectomy on the Performance of Postoperative Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Sunghwan Kim; Jeongmin Choi; Tae Han Kim; Seong-Ho Kong; Yun-Suhk Suh; Jong Pil Im; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Sang Gyun Kim; Seung-Yong Jeong; Joo Sung Kim; Han-Kwang Yang
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.720

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.