Literature DB >> 20551606

Structural differences in chromosomes distinguish species in the tomato clade.

L K Anderson1, P A Covey, L R Larsen, P Bedinger, S M Stack.   

Abstract

The tomato clade of Solanaceae is composed of 12 species that are all diploid with the same chromosome number and morphology. Species in the tomato clade are considered to have evolved primarily by genic changes rather than large-scale chromosomal rearrangements because pachytene chromosomes in F(1) hybrids synapse normally along their lengths and linkage maps of intra- and inter-specific hybrids are co-linear. However, small inversions have been reported between tomato and some of its wild relatives. Therefore, we reevaluated 5 F(1) hybrids using high-resolution, electron microscopic examination of pachytene chromosome (= synaptonemal complex) spreads to determine whether any minor structural changes had occurred among species in the tomato clade, which were not easily visible using light microscopic analysis of conventional chromosome squashes. Our study revealed a number of unexpected synaptic configurations such as mismatched kinetochores, inversion loops and reciprocal translocations. Most of these structural differences were in or close to heterochromatin that has comparatively few genes and little recombination, so they would be expected to have little effect on the evident colinearity of linkage maps, especially in euchromatin. However, these results demonstrate that substantial changes in chromosome structure have occurred among species within the tomato clade. Copyright 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20551606     DOI: 10.1159/000313850

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res        ISSN: 1424-8581            Impact factor:   1.636


  16 in total

Review 1.  Interspecific reproductive barriers in the tomato clade: opportunities to decipher mechanisms of reproductive isolation.

Authors:  Patricia A Bedinger; Roger T Chetelat; Bruce McClure; Leonie C Moyle; Jocelyn K C Rose; Stephen M Stack; Esther van der Knaap; You Soon Baek; Gloria Lopez-Casado; Paul A Covey; Aruna Kumar; Wentao Li; Reynaldo Nunez; Felipe Cruz-Garcia; Suzanne Royer
Journal:  Sex Plant Reprod       Date:  2010-11-14

2.  Cohesin proteins load sequentially during prophase I in tomato primary microsporocytes.

Authors:  Huanyu Qiao; Leslie D Lohmiller; Lorinda K Anderson
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Genome Structure of the Heavy Metal Hyperaccumulator Noccaea caerulescens and Its Stability on Metalliferous and Nonmetalliferous Soils.

Authors:  Terezie Mandáková; Vasantika Singh; Ute Krämer; Martin A Lysak
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Comparative analysis of repetitive sequences among species from the potato and the tomato clades.

Authors:  Paola Gaiero; Magdalena Vaio; Sander A Peters; M Eric Schranz; Hans de Jong; Pablo R Speranza
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Development of a large SNP genotyping array and generation of high-density genetic maps in tomato.

Authors:  Sung-Chur Sim; Gregor Durstewitz; Jörg Plieske; Ralf Wieseke; Martin W Ganal; Allen Van Deynze; John P Hamilton; C Robin Buell; Mathilde Causse; Saranga Wijeratne; David M Francis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Phylogenomics Reveals Three Sources of Adaptive Variation during a Rapid Radiation.

Authors:  James B Pease; David C Haak; Matthew W Hahn; Leonie C Moyle
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  Molecular, genetic and evolutionary analysis of a paracentric inversion in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Paul Fransz; Gabriella Linc; Cheng-Ruei Lee; Saulo Alves Aflitos; Jesse R Lasky; Christopher Toomajian; Hoda Ali; Janny Peters; Peter van Dam; Xianwen Ji; Mateusz Kuzak; Tom Gerats; Ingo Schubert; Korbinian Schneeberger; Vincent Colot; Rob Martienssen; Maarten Koornneef; Magnus Nordborg; Thomas E Juenger; Hans de Jong; Michael E Schranz
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 6.417

8.  Detection of an inversion in the Ty-2 region between S. lycopersicum and S. habrochaites by a combination of de novo genome assembly and BAC cloning.

Authors:  Anne-Marie A Wolters; Myluska Caro; Shufang Dong; Richard Finkers; Jianchang Gao; Richard G F Visser; Xiaoxuan Wang; Yongchen Du; Yuling Bai
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization and optical mapping to correct scaffold arrangement in the tomato genome.

Authors:  Lindsay A Shearer; Lorinda K Anderson; Hans de Jong; Sandra Smit; José Luis Goicoechea; Bruce A Roe; Axin Hua; James J Giovannoni; Stephen M Stack
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Neofunctionalization of Chromoplast Specific Lycopene Beta Cyclase Gene (CYC-B) in Tomato Clade.

Authors:  Vijee Mohan; Arun Pandey; Yellamaraju Sreelakshmi; Rameshwar Sharma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.