Literature DB >> 2055141

Healing of colonic anastomoses: comparative experimental study of glued, manually sutured, and stapled anastomoses.

O K Jansson1, T L Zilling, B S Walther.   

Abstract

In 10 pigs a nonsutured, glued colonic anastomosis was constructed with a modified stapling device without staples and compared with an EEA-stapled anastomosis and a one-layer-sutured anastomosis concerning radiologic appearance, breaking strength, circulation, and collagen concentration. 141Ce-labeled microspheres were used for measurements of the anastomotic blood flow before the animals were sacrificed on the 4th postoperative day. The breaking strength was recorded and an anastomotic index calculated. No leakage was found. The anastomotic width did not differ between the groups, but the interindividual variation was more prominent in the sutured group. The handsewn and stapled anastomoses were stronger than the glued anastomosis (P = 0.0009 and 0.0054, respectively). There was an increase in the anastomotic circulation in all of the anastomoses, but no differences were seen between groups. The collagen concentration was independent of the technique used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2055141     DOI: 10.1007/bf02049894

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  5 in total

1.  Anastomotic sealing by extracellular matrices (ECM) improves healing of colonic anastomoses in the critical early phase.

Authors:  Jens Hoeppner; Bettina Wassmuth; Goran Marjanovic; Sylvia Timme; Ulrich Theodor Hopt; Tobias Keck
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Effects of the time interval between clamping and linear stapling for resection of porcine small intestine.

Authors:  K Morita; N Maeda; T Kawaoka; S Hiraki; A Kudo; S Fukuda; M Oka
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Effect of 5-fluorouracil plus interferon on the integrity of colonic anastomoses covering with fibrin glue.

Authors:  D Kanellos; K Blouhos; M G Pramateftakis; I Kanellos; H Demetriades; L Sakkas; D Betsis
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Small intestinal submucosa for reinforcement of colonic anastomosis.

Authors:  Jens Hoeppner; Vladan Crnogorac; Goran Marjanovic; Eva Jüttner; Tobias Keck; Hans-Fred Weiser; Ullrich Theodor Hopt
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Cyanoacrylate for colonic anastomosis; is it safe?

Authors:  Ki-Beom Bae; Sun-Hee Kim; Soo-Jin Jung; Kwan-Hee Hong
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 2.571

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.