Literature DB >> 20551185

Right lobe estimated blood-free weight for living donor liver transplantation: accuracy of automated blood-free CT volumetry--preliminary results.

Kyoung Won Kim1, Jeongjin Lee, Ho Lee, Woo Kyoung Jeong, Hyung Jin Won, Yong Moon Shin, Dong-Hwan Jung, Jeong Ik Park, Gi-Won Song, Tae-Yong Ha, Deok-Bog Moon, Ki-Hun Kim, Chul-Soo Ahn, Shin Hwang, Sung-Gyu Lee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the relative accuracy of automated blood-free to blood-filled computed tomographic (CT) volumetry for estimation of right-lobe weight in living donor liver transplantation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board; informed consent was waived. Between October 1, 2008, and April 30, 2009, 88 live liver donors (54 men, 34 women; mean age, 26.1 years +/- 6.9 [standard deviation]) who underwent CT and had their right lobes procured in the study institution were included. Automated measurement of blood-filled volume (V(BFill)) and blood-free volume (V(BFree)) of the right lobe was performed by using 16-row multidetector CT performed with 5-mm intervals. Actual hepatic weight was measured blood free during surgery. Percentage blood volume, %V(B), was calculated as follows: %V(B) = V(BFill) - V(BFree)/V(BFill) . 100. Pearson tests were performed to determine correlation coefficients between V(BFill)/1.22 or V(BFree) and weight. Percentage deviation and percentage absolute deviation of V(BFree) from weight were compared with those of V(BFill)/1.22 by using a paired t test or Wilcoxon rank sum test. Regression analysis was performed between V(BFree) and weight.
RESULTS: Mean V(BFill), V(BFree), and weight were 789.0 mL +/- 126.4, 713.9 mL +/- 114.4, and 717.8 g +/- 110.4. Percentage blood volume varied from 6.5% to 19.8% (mean, 9.5%). Compared with weight, the correlation coefficient was slightly higher with V(BFree) (r = 0.9140) than with V(BFill)/1.22 (r = 0.8909). Mean percentage deviation and percentage absolute deviation were significantly smaller with V(BFree) (-0.4% +/- 6.3, 5.0% +/- 3.8; P < .001) than with V(BFill)/1.22 (-9.8% +/- 6.5, 10.2% +/- 7.3; P < .001). The equation relating V(BFree) and weight, W, was as follows: W = (0.8815 . V(BFree)) + 88.5117, with R(2) of 0.8355 (P < .001).
CONCLUSION: At automated CT volumetry in live liver donors, the percentage blood volume varies. The V(BFree) is more accurate than is V(BFill)/1.22 in estimation of hepatic weight.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20551185     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10091897

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  18 in total

1.  Transplantation: 3D printing of the liver in living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Toru Ikegami; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 2.  Survey on Liver Tumour Resection Planning System: Steps, Techniques, and Parameters.

Authors:  Omar Ibrahim Alirr; Ashrani Aizzuddin Abd Rahni
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Liver regeneration after living donor transplantation: adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation cohort study.

Authors:  Kim M Olthoff; Jean C Emond; Tempie H Shearon; Greg Everson; Talia B Baker; Robert A Fisher; Chris E Freise; Brenda W Gillespie; James E Everhart
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 5.799

Review 4.  Imaging in pediatric liver transplantation.

Authors:  L Monti; G Soglia; P Tomà
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Liver angulometry: a simple method to estimate liver volume and ratios.

Authors:  Reza Kianmanesh; Tullio Piardi; Esther Tamby; Alina Parvanescu; Onorina Bruno; Elisa Palladino; Olivier Bouché; Simon Msika; Daniele Sommacale
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Quantitative radiology: automated CT liver volumetry compared with interactive volumetry and manual volumetry.

Authors:  Kenji Suzuki; Mark L Epstein; Ryan Kohlbrenner; Shailesh Garg; Masatoshi Hori; Aytekin Oto; Richard L Baron
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Liver volumetry: Is imaging reliable? Personal experience and review of the literature.

Authors:  Mirko D'Onofrio; Riccardo De Robertis; Emanuele Demozzi; Stefano Crosara; Stefano Canestrini; Roberto Pozzi Mucelli
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-04-28

8.  Hepatic volume profiles in potential living liver donors with anomalous right-sided ligamentum teres.

Authors:  So Yeong Jeong; Kyoung Won Kim; Jeongjin Lee; Jin Kyoo Jang; Heon-Ju Kwon; Gi Won Song; Sung Gyu Lee
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-10-16

Review 9.  CT and MR imaging evaluation of living liver donors.

Authors:  Federica Vernuccio; Susan A Whitney; Kadiyala Ravindra; Daniele Marin
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-01

10.  Three-Dimensional Volumetric Assessment of Graft Volume in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Does It Minimise Errors of Estimation?

Authors:  Nihar Mohapatra; Kishore Gurumoorthy Subramanya Bharathy; Piyush Kumar Sinha; Shridhar Vasantrao Sasturkar; Yashwant Patidar; Viniyendra Pamecha
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2019-03-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.