Literature DB >> 20551149

What determines Self-Rated Health (SRH)? A cross-sectional study of SF-36 health domains in the EPIC-Norfolk cohort.

Nahal Mavaddat1, Ann Louise Kinmonth, Simon Sanderson, Paul Surtees, Sheila Bingham, Kay Tee Khaw.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Self-Rated Health (SRH) as assessed by a single-item measure is an independent predictor of health outcomes. However, it remains uncertain which elements of the subjective health experience it most strongly captures. In view of its ability to predict outcomes, elucidation of what determines SRH is potentially important in the provision of services. This study aimed to determine the extent to which dimensions of physical, mental and social functioning are associated with SRH.
METHODS: We studied 20,853 men and women aged 39-79 years from a population-based cohort study (European Prospective Investigation of Cancer study) who had completed an SRH (Short Form (SF)-1) measure and SF-36 questionnaire. SF-36 subscales were used to quantify dimensions of health best predicting poor or fair SRH within a logistic regression model.
RESULTS: In multivariate models adjusting for age, gender, social class, medical conditions and depression, all subscales of the SF-36 were independently associated with SRH, with the Physical Functioning subscale more strongly associated with poor or fair compared with excellent, very good or good health (OR 3.7 (95% CI 3.3 to 4.1)) than Mental Health (OR 1.4 (95% CI 1.2 to 1.5)) or Social Functioning subscales (OR 1.8 (95% CI 1.6 to 2.0)) for those below and above the median.
CONCLUSION: This study confirms that physical functioning is more strongly associated with SRH than mental health and social functioning, even where the relative associations between each dimension and SRH may be expected to differ, such as in those with depression. It suggests that the way people take account of physical, mental and social dimensions of function when rating their health may be relatively stable across groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20551149     DOI: 10.1136/jech.2009.090845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  70 in total

1.  Are Single-Item Global Ratings Useful for Assessing Health Status?

Authors:  Cathaleene Macias; Paul B Gold; Dost Öngür; Bruce M Cohen; Trishan Panch
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2015-10-22

2.  General health status in army personnel: relations with health behaviors and psychosocial variables.

Authors:  Samuel Golenbock; Josh B Kazman; Stephen Krauss; Patricia A Deuster
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-02-25       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Socioeconomic inequality in domains of health: results from the World Health Surveys.

Authors:  Ahmad Reza Hosseinpoor; Jennifer Anne Stewart Williams; Lynn Itani; Somnath Chatterji
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Gestational Weight Gain and Health Outcomes 18 Years Later in Urban Black Women.

Authors:  Margaret L Holland; Susan W Groth; Harriet J Kitzman
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-10

5.  Tourism Experiences and Self-Rated Health Among Older Adults in China.

Authors:  Danan Gu; Haiyan Zhu; Tyson Brown; Helen Hoenig; Yi Zeng
Journal:  J Aging Health       Date:  2015-10-20

6.  Self-rated health and long-term prognosis of depression.

Authors:  Gilles Ambresin; Patty Chondros; Christopher Dowrick; Helen Herrman; Jane M Gunn
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

7.  Associated Factors of Self-Rated Mental Health Status in Southwestern Iran: Using SCAD Regression Model in a Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Najmeh Maharlouei; Fereshteh Kazemeini; Hadi Raeisi Shahraki; Kamran B Lankarani
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2017-11-08

8.  Perspectives of Patients With Cancer on the Ethics of Rapid-Learning Health Systems.

Authors:  Reshma Jagsi; Kent A Griffith; Aaron Sabolch; Rochelle Jones; Rebecca Spence; Raymond De Vries; David Grande; Angela R Bradbury
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Quality of Communication and Trust in Patients With Serious Illness: An Exploratory Study of the Relationships of Race/Ethnicity, Socioeconomic Status, and Religiosity.

Authors:  Heather Coats; Lois Downey; Rashmi K Sharma; J Randall Curtis; Ruth A Engelberg
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 3.612

10.  Hot flashes severity, complementary and alternative medicine use, and self-rated health in women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Kavita D Chandwani; Charles E Heckler; Supriya G Mohile; Karen M Mustian; Michelle Janelsins; Luke J Peppone; Peter Bushunow; Patrick J Flynn; Gary R Morrow
Journal:  Explore (NY)       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 1.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.