| Literature DB >> 20550839 |
Priscilla Ivester1, Susan Sergeant, Suzanne C Danhauer, L Douglas Case, Alec Lamb, Briana G Chilton, Bonnie Delar, Monica L Hollingshead, Kelly L Weaver, Floyd H Chilton.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: A rise in obesity, poor-quality diets, and low physical activity has led to a dramatic increase in the number of Americans with metabolic syndrome and diabetes. Our objective was to determine the effect of a short-term, multifaceted wellness program carried out in a church setting on weight, metabolic syndrome, and self-reported wellness.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20550839 PMCID: PMC2901579
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prev Chronic Dis ISSN: 1545-1151 Impact factor: 2.830
Figure.Weight, percentage of weight loss, percentage of body fat, and body mass index (BMI) in 41 overweight or obese congregants (27 women and 14 men) during an 8-week diet and exercise intervention and 10-week follow-up, Hillsdale United Methodist Church Wellness Study, Advance, North Carolina, April-August 2008. Data points are means and error bars represent standard errors.
Effect of an 8-Week Diet and Exercise Intervention on Self-Reported Wellness and Quality of Life, Hillsdale United Methodist Church Wellness Study, Advance, North Carolina, April-August 2008
| Domain | Women (n = 17), Mean ± SD | Men (n = 10), Mean ± SD | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Baseline | Week 8 |
| Baseline | Week 8 |
| |
| Physical distress | 3.2 ± 0.8 | 2.4 ± 0.6 | .005 | 2.7 ± 0.8 | 2.2 ± 0.5 | .04 |
| Emotional distress | 2.6 ± 0.6 | 2.1 ± 0.3 | .001 | 2.1 ± 0.4 | 1.8 ± 0.4 | .009 |
| Perceived stress | 2.4 ± 0.8 | 2.0 ± 0.5 | .01 | 2.2 ± 0.6 | 1.9 ± 0.4 | .04 |
| Sleep | 2.4 ± 0.9 | 2.0 ± 0.8 | .21 | 2.4 ± 0.8 | 2.1 ± 0.7 | .34 |
| Body image | 3.9 ± 1.5 | 4.8 ± 1.2 | .02 | 3.5 ± 1.4 | 5.1 ± 1.0 | .001 |
| Life as a whole | 5.3 ± 1.2 | 5.5 ± 1.1 | .30 | 5.4 ± 0.8 | 6.1 ± 0.7 | .001 |
| Emotional well-being | 3.2 ± 0.7 | 3.6 ± 0.7 | .002 | 3.4 ± 0.5 | 3.9 ± 0.7 | .06 |
| Healthy lifestyle | 4.4 ± 0.6 | 4.8 ± 0.4 | .004 | 3.5 ± 1.0 | 4.5 ± 0.5 | .008 |
Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation.
Pairwise analysis of baseline vs week 8 differences for each group (women, men) by using paired t test (2-tailed).
Range, 1-5; lower scores indicate better well-being.
Range, 1-7; higher scores indicate better well-being
Range, 1-5; higher scores indicate better well-being.
Effect of an 8-Week Diet and Exercise Intervention on Risk Factors for Metabolic Syndrome, Hillsdale United Methodist Church Wellness Study, Advance, North Carolina, April-August 2008
| Risk Factor | Women (n= 27) | Men (n= 14) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||
| Baseline | Week 8 | Baseline | Week 8 | |||||
|
| ||||||||
| Mean ± SD | No. With Risk | Mean ± SD | No. With Risk | Mean ± SD | No. With Risk | Mean ± SD | No. With Risk | |
| Waist circumference, cm | 93.7 ± 15.5 | 14 | 82.8 ± 14.5 | 7 | 109.2 ± 19.2 | 10 | 97.8 ± 11.6 | 4 |
| Triglyceride level, mg/dL | 118.1 ± 66.2 | 7 | 101.6 ± 57.0 | 5 | 144.4 ± 93.9 | 5 | 134.0 ± 97.9 | 3 |
| HDL cholesterol level, mg/dL | 52.1 ± 15.5 | 17 | 48.9 ± 14.2 | 18 | 39.2 ± 12.9 | 10 | 42.0 ± 19.1 | 10 |
| SBP, mm Hg | 134.9 ± 17.4 | 16 | 130.5 ± 20.6 | 13 | 134.7 ± 23.5 | 8 | 127.1 ± 23.2 | 4 |
| DBP, mm Hg | 80.2 ± 8.7 | 79.8 ± 10.2 | 84.3 ± 12.9 | 81.2 ± 15.1 | ||||
| Fasting glucose level, mg/dL | 94.5 ± 17.3 | 2 | 95.2 ± 23.0 | 1 | 104.4 ± 37.8 | 2 | 107.6 ± 62.5 | 1 |
Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure.
Metabolic syndrome is defined as any 3 of the following: waist circumference >102 cm (men) or >88 cm (women), triglyceride level ≥150 mg/dL, HDL cholesterol level <40 mg/dL (men) or <50 mg/dL (women), blood pressure ≥130/85 mm Hg, or fasting glucose level ≥100 mg/dL.
The change in values was significant (P < .05) for waist circumference (women and men) and SBP (men only).
Effect of an 8-Week Diet and Exercise Intervention on Indexes of Insulin Resistance, Hillsdale United Methodist Church Wellness Study, Advance, North Carolina, April-August 2008
| Parameter | Women (n = 27), Mean ± SD | Men (n = 14), Mean ± SD | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Baseline | Week 8 |
| Baseline | Week 8 |
| |
| Insulin level, µU/mL | 7.0 ± 3.9 | 4.3 ± 4.4 | <.001 | 20.1 ± 22.8 | 14.6 ± 18.8 | .04 |
| HOMA | 1.6 ± 1.0 | 1.1 ± 1.0 | <.001 | 5.1 ± 5.2 | 3.7 ± 4.6 | .04 |
| HbA1c, % | 6.0 ± 0.7 | 5.5 ± 0.6 | <.001 | 5.9 ± 0.3 | 5.7 ± 1.8 | .006 |
| SCD1 | 0.09 ± 0.03 | 0.07 ± 0.02 | <.001 | 0.08 ± 0.03 | 0.06 ± 0.02 | .01 |
| Palmitoleic acid level, mg/dL | 5.9 ± 3.5 | 4.4 ± 2.5 | .01 | 5.2 ± 2.9 | 4.4 ± 2.6 | .11 |
Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; HOMA, homeostatic model assessment; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; SCD1, stearoyl-coenzyme A desaturase 1.
Pairwise analysis of baseline vs week 8 differences for each group (women, men) by using paired t test (2-tailed).
Calculated as (mmol/L fasting glucose × μU/mL fasting insulin)/22.5.
SCD1 activity was calculated as ratio of serum levels of C16:1 to C16:0 fatty acids
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
|
|
| |||
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
| |
| 0 | 84.3 | 3.1 | 98.9 | 5.2 |
| 1 | 83.5 | 3.4 | 97.4 | 5.0 |
| 2 | 82.6 | 3.2 | 98.0 | 6.2 |
| 3 | 82.0 | 3.1 | 95.1 | 6.0 |
| 4 | 81.2 | 3.8 | 95.1 | 5.5 |
| 5 | 83.5 | 3.7 | 95.6 | 5.3 |
| 6 | 81.2 | 3.8 | 93.7 | 4.5 |
| 7 | 79.4 | 3.5 | 97.2 | 5.0 |
| 8 | 79.5 | 3.2 | 93.0 | 4.6 |
| 13 | 79.0 | 4.2 | 93.4 | 4.9 |
| 18 | 76.7 | 3.3 | 94.8 | 6.7 |