Literature DB >> 20550743

Canadian health care professionals' knowledge, attitudes and perceptions of nutritional genomics.

Mark Weir1, Karine Morin, Nola Ries, David Castle.   

Abstract

Nutritional genomics has reached the public through applications of the Human Genome Project offered direct to consumers (DTC). The ability to pursue nutrigenetic testing without the involvement of a health care professional has received considerable attention from academic and policy commentators. To better understand the knowledge and attitudes of Canadian health care professionals regarding nutritional genomics and nutrigenetic testing, qualitative research in the form of focus group discussions was undertaken. Four key themes emerged: (1) concerns over DTC testing; (2) lack of health care professional competency; (3) genetic scepticism and inevitability; (4) expectation of regulation. Together, they indicate that health care professionals have little knowledge about nutritional genomics and hold contradictory attitudes towards genomics in general, and to nutritional genomics in particular. Respondents argue in favour of a delivery model where health care professionals act as intermediaries. They are also aware of their lack of competency to provide such services. To ensure greater public protection, respondents cite the importance of more stringent regulatory oversight of DTC genetic testing. Whether such an approach is necessary to address the various ethical and social issues raised by nutrigenetic testing remains an open debate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20550743     DOI: 10.1017/S0007114510002035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Nutr        ISSN: 0007-1145            Impact factor:   3.718


  6 in total

1.  A randomized trial of genetic information for personalized nutrition.

Authors:  Daiva E Nielsen; Ahmed El-Sohemy
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2012-03-11       Impact factor: 5.523

2.  Bridging the gap in genetics: a progressive model for primary to specialist care.

Authors:  Brittany Harding; Colleen Webber; Lucia Rühland; Nancy Dalgarno; Christine Armour; Richard Birtwhistle; Glenn Brown; June C Carroll; Michael Flavin; Susan P Phillips; Jennifer J MacKenzie
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  "Right diet for the right person": a focus group study of nutritionist-dietitians' perspectives on nutritional genomics and gene-based nutrition advice.

Authors:  Jacus S Nacis; Marilou R Galang; Jason Paolo H Labrador; Milflor S Gonzales; Aurora Maria Francesca D Dablo; Diana Glades A Domalanta-Ronquillo; Victor Franco J Alfonso; Idelia G Glorioso; Marietta P Rodriguez
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2021-10-27

Review 4.  Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Loredana Covolo; Sara Rubinelli; Elisabetta Ceretti; Umberto Gelatti
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 5.  Ethical issues in the development and implementation of nutrition-related public health policies and interventions: A scoping review.

Authors:  Thierry Hurlimann; Juan Pablo Peña-Rosas; Abha Saxena; Gerardo Zamora; Béatrice Godard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Dynamic Macronutrient Meal-Equivalent Menu Method: Towards Individual Nutrition Intervention Programs.

Authors:  Ana Teresa Limon-Miro; Veronica Lopez-Teros; Humberto Astiazaran-Garcia
Journal:  Methods Protoc       Date:  2019-09-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.