Literature DB >> 20550575

The genomic architecture of sexual dimorphism in the dioecious plant Silene latifolia.

Lynda F Delph1, A Michele Arntz, Caroline Scotti-Saintagne, Ivan Scotti.   

Abstract

Evaluating the genetic architecture of sexual dimorphism can aid our understanding of the extent to which shared genetic control of trait variation versus sex-specific control impacts the evolutionary dynamics of phenotypic change within each sex. We performed a QTL analysis on Silene latifolia to evaluate the contribution of sex-specific QTL to phenotypic variation in 46 traits, whether traits involved in trade-offs had colocalized QTL, and whether the distribution of sex-specific loci can explain differences between the sexes in their variance/covariance matrices. We used a backcross generation derived from two artificial-selection lines. We found that sex-specific QTL explained a significantly greater percent of the variation in sexually dimorphic traits than loci expressed in both sexes. Genetically correlated traits often had colocalized QTL, whose signs were in the expected direction. Lastly, traits with different genetic correlations within the sexes displayed a disproportionately high number of sex-specific QTL, and more QTL co-occurred in males than females, suggesting greater trait integration. These results show that sex differences in QTL patterns are congruent with theory on the resolution of sexual conflict and differences based on G-matrix results. They also suggest that trade-offs and trait integration are likely to affect males more than females.
© 2010 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2010 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20550575     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01048.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  30 in total

Review 1.  Dynamics of sex expression and chromosome diversity in Cucurbitaceae: a story in the making.

Authors:  Biplab Kumar Bhowmick; Sumita Jha
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.166

2.  The effects of inbreeding, genetic dissimilarity and phenotype on male reproductive success in a dioecious plant.

Authors:  Frédéric Austerlitz; Gabriela Gleiser; Sara Teixeira; Giorgina Bernasconi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Genetics of dioecy and causal sex chromosomes in plants.

Authors:  Sushil Kumar; Renu Kumari; Vishakha Sharma
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.166

4.  Sexually antagonistic polymorphism in simultaneous hermaphrodites.

Authors:  Crispin Y Jordan; Tim Connallon
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 5.  The genetics of sex chromosomes: evolution and implications for hybrid incompatibility.

Authors:  Norman A Johnson; Joseph Lachance
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Comparative de novo transcriptome analysis of male and female Sea buckthorn.

Authors:  Ankush Bansal; Mehul Salaria; Tashil Sharma; Tsering Stobdan; Anil Kant
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 2.406

7.  Sex-biased gene expression at homomorphic sex chromosomes in emus and its implication for sex chromosome evolution.

Authors:  Beatriz Vicoso; Vera B Kaiser; Doris Bachtrog
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Veratrole biosynthesis in white campion.

Authors:  Tariq A Akhtar; Eran Pichersky
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Sexual dimorphism and rapid turnover in gene expression in pre-reproductive seedlings of a dioecious herb.

Authors:  Guillaume G Cossard; Melissa A Toups; John R Pannell
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 4.357

10.  Testing for the footprint of sexually antagonistic polymorphisms in the pseudoautosomal region of a plant sex chromosome pair.

Authors:  Suo Qiu; Roberta Bergero; Deborah Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.