Literature DB >> 20549702

The development of composite circulating biomarker models for use in anticancer drug clinical development.

Lee J Lancashire1, Darren L Roberts, Caroline Dive, Andrew G Renehan.   

Abstract

The development of informative composite circulating biomarkers predicting cancer presence or therapy response is clinically attractive but optimal approaches to modeling are as yet unclear. This study investigated multidimensional relationships within an example panel of serum insulin-like growth factor (IGF) peptides using logistic regression (LR), fractional polynomial (FP), regression, artificial neural networks (ANNs) and support vector machines (SVMs) to derive predictive models for colorectal cancer (CRC). Two phase 2 biomarker validation analyses were performed: controls were ambulant adults (n = 722); cases were: (i) CRC patients (n = 100) and (ii) patients with acromegaly (n = 52), the latter as "positive" discriminators. Serum IGF-I, IGF-II, IGF binding protein (IGFBP)-2 and -3 were measured. Discriminatory characteristics were compared within and between models. For the LR, FP and ANN models, and to a lesser extent SVMs, the addition of covariates at several steps improved discrimination characteristics. The optimum biomarker combination discriminating CRC vs. controls was achieved using ANN models [sensitivity, 94%; specificity, 90%; accuracy, 0.975 (95% CIs: 0.948 1.000)]. ANN modeling significantly outperformed LR, FP and SVM in terms of discrimination (p < 0.0001) and calibration. The acromegaly analysis demonstrated expected high performance characteristics in the ANN model [accuracy, 0.993 (95% CIs: 0.977, 1.000)]. Curved decision surfaces generated from the ANNs revealed the potential clinical utility. This example demonstrated improved discriminatory characteristics within the composite biomarker ANN model and a final model that outperformed the three other models. This modeling approach forms the basis to evaluate composite biomarkers as pharmacological and predictive biomarkers in future clinical trials.
Copyright © 2010 UICC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20549702     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.25513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  5 in total

1.  Pharmacodynamic modelling of biomarker data in oncology.

Authors:  Robert C Jackson
Journal:  ISRN Pharmacol       Date:  2012-02-16

2.  DACH1: its role as a classifier of long term good prognosis in luminal breast cancer.

Authors:  Desmond G Powe; Gopal Krishna R Dhondalay; Christophe Lemetre; Tony Allen; Hany O Habashy; Ian O Ellis; Robert Rees; Graham R Ball
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  IGF-Binding Protein 2 - Oncogene or Tumor Suppressor?

Authors:  Adam Pickard; Dennis J McCance
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 5.555

4.  Prognostic relevance and performance characteristics of serum IGFBP-2 and PAPP-A in women with breast cancer: a long-term Danish cohort study.

Authors:  Ulrick Espelund; Andrew G Renehan; Søren Cold; Claus Oxvig; Lee Lancashire; Zhenqiang Su; Allan Flyvbjerg; Jan Frystyk
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 4.452

5.  Development of a prognostic composite cytokine signature based on the correlation with nivolumab clearance: translational PK/PD analysis in patients with renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Rui Wang; Junying Zheng; Xiao Shao; Yuko Ishii; Amit Roy; Akintunde Bello; Richard Lee; Joshua Zhang; Megan Wind-Rotolo; Yan Feng
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 13.751

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.