PURPOSE: To define a gene expression profile of BRCAness that correlates with chemotherapy response and outcome in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS: A publicly available microarray data set including 61 patients with EOC with either sporadic disease or BRCA(1/2) germline mutations was used for development of the BRCAness profile. Correlation with platinum responsiveness was assessed in platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant tumor biopsy specimens from six patients with BRCA germline mutations. Association with poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor responsiveness and with radiation-induced RAD51 foci formation (a surrogate of homologous recombination) was assessed in Capan-1 cell line clones. The BRCAness profile was validated in 70 patients enriched for sporadic disease to assess its association with outcome. RESULTS: The BRCAness profile accurately predicted platinum responsiveness in eight out of 10 patient-derived tumor specimens, and between PARP-inhibitor sensitivity and resistance in four out of four Capan-1 clones. [corrected] When applied to the 70 patients with sporadic disease, patients with the BRCA-like (BL) profile had improved disease-free survival (34 months v 15 months; log-rank P = .013) and overall survival (72 months v 41 months; log-rank P = .006) compared with patients with a non-BRCA-like (NBL) profile, respectively. The BRCAness profile maintained independent prognostic value in multivariate analysis, which controlled for other known clinical prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: The BRCAness profile correlates with responsiveness to platinum and PARP inhibitors and identifies a subset of sporadic patients with improved outcome. Additional evaluation of this profile as a predictive tool in patients with sporadic EOC is warranted.
PURPOSE: To define a gene expression profile of BRCAness that correlates with chemotherapy response and outcome in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS: A publicly available microarray data set including 61 patients with EOC with either sporadic disease or BRCA(1/2) germline mutations was used for development of the BRCAness profile. Correlation with platinum responsiveness was assessed in platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant tumor biopsy specimens from six patients with BRCA germline mutations. Association with poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor responsiveness and with radiation-induced RAD51 foci formation (a surrogate of homologous recombination) was assessed in Capan-1 cell line clones. The BRCAness profile was validated in 70 patients enriched for sporadic disease to assess its association with outcome. RESULTS: The BRCAness profile accurately predicted platinum responsiveness in eight out of 10 patient-derived tumor specimens, and between PARP-inhibitor sensitivity and resistance in four out of four Capan-1 clones. [corrected] When applied to the 70 patients with sporadic disease, patients with the BRCA-like (BL) profile had improved disease-free survival (34 months v 15 months; log-rank P = .013) and overall survival (72 months v 41 months; log-rank P = .006) compared with patients with a non-BRCA-like (NBL) profile, respectively. The BRCAness profile maintained independent prognostic value in multivariate analysis, which controlled for other known clinical prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: The BRCAness profile correlates with responsiveness to platinum and PARP inhibitors and identifies a subset of sporadic patients with improved outcome. Additional evaluation of this profile as a predictive tool in patients with sporadic EOC is warranted.
Authors: Jeffrey L Hilton; John P Geisler; Jennifer A Rathe; Melanie A Hattermann-Zogg; Barry DeYoung; Richard E Buller Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2002-09-18 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: David S P Tan; Christian Rothermundt; Karen Thomas; Elizabeth Bancroft; Rosalind Eeles; Susan Shanley; Audrey Ardern-Jones; Andrew Norman; Stanley B Kaye; Martin E Gore Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-10-27 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: M Esteller; J M Silva; G Dominguez; F Bonilla; X Matias-Guiu; E Lerma; E Bussaglia; J Prat; I C Harkes; E A Repasky; E Gabrielson; M Schutte; S B Baylin; J G Herman Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-04-05 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: John P Geisler; Melanie A Hatterman-Zogg; Jennifer A Rathe; Richard E Buller Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2002-01-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: S T Durant; M M Morris; M Illand; H J McKay; C McCormick; G L Hirst; R H Borts; R Brown Journal: Curr Biol Date: 1999-01-14 Impact factor: 10.834
Authors: Panagiotis A Konstantinopoulos; Elena Fountzilas; Kamana Pillay; Luiz F Zerbini; Towia A Libermann; Stephen A Cannistra; Dimitrios Spentzos Journal: BMC Med Genomics Date: 2008-11-28 Impact factor: 3.063
Authors: Joyce Liu; Mihaela C Cristea; Paul Frankel; Susan L Neuhausen; Linda Steele; Verena Engelstaedter; Ursula Matulonis; Sharon Sand; Nadine Tung; Judy E Garber; Jeffrey N Weitzel Journal: Cancer Genet Date: 2012 Jan-Feb
Authors: Roel G W Verhaak; Pablo Tamayo; Ji-Yeon Yang; Diana Hubbard; Hailei Zhang; Chad J Creighton; Sian Fereday; Michael Lawrence; Scott L Carter; Craig H Mermel; Aleksandar D Kostic; Dariush Etemadmoghadam; Gordon Saksena; Kristian Cibulskis; Sekhar Duraisamy; Keren Levanon; Carrie Sougnez; Aviad Tsherniak; Sebastian Gomez; Robert Onofrio; Stacey Gabriel; Lynda Chin; Nianxiang Zhang; Paul T Spellman; Yiqun Zhang; Rehan Akbani; Katherine A Hoadley; Ari Kahn; Martin Köbel; David Huntsman; Robert A Soslow; Anna Defazio; Michael J Birrer; Joe W Gray; John N Weinstein; David D Bowtell; Ronny Drapkin; Jill P Mesirov; Gad Getz; Douglas A Levine; Matthew Meyerson Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2012-12-21 Impact factor: 14.808