Literature DB >> 20547779

Identifying cliques of convergent characters: concerted evolution in the cormorants and shags.

Barbara R Holland1, Hamish G Spencer, Trevor H Worthy, Martyn Kennedy.   

Abstract

A phylogenetic tree comprising clades with high bootstrap values or other strong measures of statistical support is usually interpreted as providing a good estimate of the true phylogeny. Convergent evolution acting on groups of characters in concert, however, can lead to highly supported but erroneous phylogenies. Identifying such groups of phylogenetically misleading characters is obviously desirable. Here we present a procedure that uses an independent data source to identify sets of characters that have undergone concerted convergent evolution. We examine the problematic case of the cormorants and shags, for which trees constructed using osteological and molecular characters both have strong statistical support and yet are fundamentally incongruent. We find that the osteological characters can be separated into those that fit the phylogenetic history implied by the molecular data set and those that do not. Moreover, these latter nonfitting osteological characters are internally consistent and form groups of mutually compatible characters or "cliques," which are significantly larger than cliques of shuffled characters. We suggest, therefore, that these cliques of characters are the result of similar selective pressures and are a signature of concerted convergence.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20547779     DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syq023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Biol        ISSN: 1063-5157            Impact factor:   15.683


  13 in total

1.  Phylogenetic analysis of pelecaniformes (aves) based on osteological data: implications for waterbird phylogeny and fossil calibration studies.

Authors:  Nathan D Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  The morphological state space revisited: what do phylogenetic patterns in homoplasy tell us about the number of possible character states?

Authors:  Jennifer F Hoyal Cuthill
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2015-12-06       Impact factor: 3.906

3.  Computational biomechanics changes our view on insect head evolution.

Authors:  Alexander Blanke; Peter J Watson; Richard Holbrey; Michael J Fagan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Distinguishing Between Convergent Evolution and Violation of the Molecular Clock for Three Taxa.

Authors:  Jonathan D Mitchell; Jeremy G Sumner; Barbara R Holland
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 15.683

5.  Species notions that combine phylogenetic trees and phenotypic partitions.

Authors:  Anica Hoppe; Sonja Türpitz; Mike Steel
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 2.259

Review 6.  Progress, pitfalls and parallel universes: a history of insect phylogenetics.

Authors:  Karl M Kjer; Chris Simon; Margarita Yavorskaya; Rolf G Beutel
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Assessing Bayesian Phylogenetic Information Content of Morphological Data Using Knowledge From Anatomy Ontologies.

Authors:  Diego S Porto; Wasila M Dahdul; Hilmar Lapp; James P Balhoff; Todd J Vision; Paula M Mabee; Josef Uyeda
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 9.160

8.  Dental Data Perform Relatively Poorly in Reconstructing Mammal Phylogenies: Morphological Partitions Evaluated with Molecular Benchmarks.

Authors:  Robert S Sansom; Matthew Albion Wills; Tamara Williams
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 9.160

9.  A New Hierarchy of Phylogenetic Models Consistent with Heterogeneous Substitution Rates.

Authors:  Michael D Woodhams; Jesús Fernández-Sánchez; Jeremy G Sumner
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 15.683

10.  Fossilization causes organisms to appear erroneously primitive by distorting evolutionary trees.

Authors:  Robert S Sansom; Matthew A Wills
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.