Literature DB >> 20547195

Biomonitoring equivalents for inorganic arsenic.

Sean M Hays1, Lesa L Aylward, Michelle Gagné, Andy Nong, Kannan Krishnan.   

Abstract

This paper presents Biomonitoring Equivalents (BEs) for inorganic arsenic. Biomonitoring Equivalents (BEs) are defined as the concentration or range of concentrations of a chemical or its metabolite in a biological medium (blood, urine, or other medium) that is consistent with an existing health-based exposure guideline, and are derived by integrating available data on pharmacokinetics with existing chemical risk assessments. This study reviews available health-based exposure guidance values for arsenic based on recent evaluations from the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), US Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) and Health Canada (HC). BE values corresponding to the Reference Dose (RfD) or risk-specific doses for cancer endpoints from these agencies were derived based on kinetic data (urinary excretion) from controlled dosing studies in humans. The BE values presented here provide estimates of the sum of inorganic arsenic-derived urinary biomarkers (inorganic arsenic, monomethylated arsenic, and dimethylated arsenic). The BE associated with the United States Environmental Protection Agency's Reference Dose and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry's Minimal Risk Level is 6.4 microg arsenic/L urine. The BEs associated with the various cancer risk assessments are significantly lower. These BE values may be used as screening tools for evaluation of biomonitoring data for inorganic arsenic in a public health risk context. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20547195     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  12 in total

1.  Worrying exposure to trace elements in the population of Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).

Authors:  J Tuakuila; D Lison; A-C Lantin; F Mbuyi; G Deumer; V Haufroid; P Hoet
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 2.  Exposure to Mixtures of Metals and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes: A Multidisciplinary Review Using an Adverse Outcome Pathway Framework.

Authors:  Katherine von Stackelberg; Elizabeth Guzy; Tian Chu; Birgit Claus Henn
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 4.000

Review 3.  Prenatal Exposure to Potentially Toxic Metals and Their Effects on Genetic Material in Offspring: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Marvin Paz-Sabillón; Luisa Torres-Sánchez; Maricela Piña-Pozas; Luz M Del Razo; Betzabet Quintanilla-Vega
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Chemical Mixtures in the EU Population: Composition and Potential Risks.

Authors:  Sebastian Socianu; Stephanie K Bopp; Eva Govarts; Liese Gilles; Jurgen Buekers; Marike Kolossa-Gehring; Thomas Backhaus; Antonio Franco
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Arsenic and subclinical vascular damage in a sample of Italian young adults: a cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Francesco Stea; Francesco Faita; Andrea Borghini; Francesca Faita; Fabrizio Bianchi; Elisa Bustaffa; Fabrizio Minichilli; Maria Grazia Andreassi; Rosa Sicari
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-07-23       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Evaluation of biomonitoring data from the CDC National Exposure Report in a risk assessment context: perspectives across chemicals.

Authors:  Lesa L Aylward; Christopher R Kirman; Rita Schoeny; Christopher J Portier; Sean M Hays
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 7.  Arsenic toxicokinetic modeling and risk analysis: Progress, needs and applications.

Authors:  Elaina M Kenyon
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 4.571

8.  Estimation of arsenic intake from drinking water and food (raw and cooked) in a rural village of northern Chile. Urine as a biomarker of recent exposure.

Authors:  Oscar Pablo Diaz; Rafael Arcos; Yasna Tapia; Rubén Pastene; Dínoraz Velez; Vicenta Devesa; Rosa Montoro; Valeska Aguilera; Miriam Becerra
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Arsenic exposure is associated with pediatric pneumonia in rural Bangladesh: a case control study.

Authors:  Christine Marie George; W Abdullah Brooks; Joseph H Graziano; Bareng A S Nonyane; Lokman Hossain; Doli Goswami; Khalequzzaman Zaman; Mohammad Yunus; Al Fazal Khan; Yasmin Jahan; Dilruba Ahmed; Vesna Slavkovich; Melissa Higdon; Maria Deloria-Knoll; Katherine L O' Brien
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 5.984

10.  Intra-household agreement of urinary elemental concentrations in Tanzania and Kenya: potential surrogates in case-control studies.

Authors:  Daniel R S Middleton; Valerie A McCormack; Michael O Munishi; Diana Menya; Andrew L Marriott; Elliott M Hamilton; Amos O Mwasamwaja; Blandina T Mmbaga; David Samoei; Odipo Osano; Joachim Schüz; Michael J Watts
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 5.563

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.