Literature DB >> 20547147

Differential activation of canonical Wnt signaling determines cranial sutures fate: a novel mechanism for sagittal suture craniosynostosis.

Björn Behr1, Michael T Longaker, Natalina Quarto.   

Abstract

Premature closure of cranial sutures, which serve as growth centers for the skull vault, result in craniosynostosis. In the mouse posterior frontal (PF) suture closes by endochondral ossification, whereas sagittal (SAG) remain patent life time, although both are neural crest tissue derived. We therefore, investigated why cranial sutures of same tissue origin adopt a different fate. We demonstrated that closure of the PF suture is tightly regulated by canonical Wnt signaling, whereas patency of the SAG suture is achieved by constantly activated canonical Wnt signaling. Importantly, the fate of PF and SAG sutures can be reversed by manipulating Wnt signaling. Continuous activation of canonical Wnt signaling in the PF suture inhibits endochondral ossification and therefore, suture closure, In contrast, inhibition of canonical Wnt signaling in the SAG suture, upon treatment with Wnt antagonists results in endochondral ossification and suture closure. Thus, inhibition of canonical Wnt signaling in the SAG suture phenocopies craniosynostosis. Moreover, mice haploinsufficient for Twist1, a target gene of canonical Wnt signaling which inhibits chondrogenesis, have sagittal craniosynostosis. We propose that regulation of canonical Wnt signaling is of crucial importance during the physiological patterning of PF and SAG sutures. Importantly, dysregulation of this pathway may lead to craniosynostosis. Copyright 2010. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20547147     DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Biol        ISSN: 0012-1606            Impact factor:   3.582


  30 in total

1.  Mutation Screening of Candidate Genes in Patients with Nonsyndromic Sagittal Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Xiaoqian Ye; Audrey Guilmatre; Boris Reva; Inga Peter; Yann Heuzé; Joan T Richtsmeier; Deborah J Fox; Rhinda J Goedken; Ethylin Wang Jabs; Paul A Romitti
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 2.  The role of vertebrate models in understanding craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Greg Holmes
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Exome sequencing of two Italian pedigrees with non-isolated Chiari malformation type I reveals candidate genes for cranio-facial development.

Authors:  Elisa Merello; Lorenzo Tattini; Alberto Magi; Andrea Accogli; Gianluca Piatelli; Marco Pavanello; Domenico Tortora; Armando Cama; Zoha Kibar; Valeria Capra; Patrizia De Marco
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  De novo mutations in inhibitors of Wnt, BMP, and Ras/ERK signaling pathways in non-syndromic midline craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Andrew T Timberlake; Charuta G Furey; Jungmin Choi; Carol Nelson-Williams; Erin Loring; Amy Galm; Kristopher T Kahle; Derek M Steinbacher; Dawid Larysz; John A Persing; Richard P Lifton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Neural crest cell signaling pathways critical to cranial bone development and pathology.

Authors:  Yuji Mishina; Taylor Nicholas Snider
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 3.905

6.  Sclerostin Antibody-Induced Changes in Bone Mass Are Site Specific in Developing Crania.

Authors:  Amanda L Scheiber; David K Barton; Basma M Khoury; Joan C Marini; Donald L Swiderski; Michelle S Caird; Kenneth M Kozloff
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 7.  Craniosynostosis: molecular pathways and future pharmacologic therapy.

Authors:  Kshemendra Senarath-Yapa; Michael T Chung; Adrian McArdle; Victor W Wong; Natalina Quarto; Michael T Longaker; Derrick C Wan
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 2.500

8.  Activation of the IGF1 pathway mediates changes in cellular contractility and motility in single-suture craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Zeinab Al-Rekabi; Marsha M Wheeler; Andrea Leonard; Adriane M Fura; Ilsa Juhlin; Christopher Frazar; Joshua D Smith; Sarah S Park; Jennifer A Gustafson; Christine M Clarke; Michael L Cunningham; Nathan J Sniadecki
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 5.285

9.  Transcriptome correlation analysis identifies two unique craniosynostosis subtypes associated with IRS1 activation.

Authors:  B D Stamper; B Mecham; S S Park; H Wilkerson; F M Farin; R P Beyer; T K Bammler; L M Mangravite; M L Cunningham
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 3.107

Review 10.  Models of cranial suture biology.

Authors:  Monica Grova; David D Lo; Daniel Montoro; Jeong S Hyun; Michael T Chung; Derrick C Wan; Michael T Longaker
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.