Literature DB >> 20546991

Partial nephrectomy is associated with improved overall survival compared to radical nephrectomy in patients with unanticipated benign renal tumours.

Christopher J Weight1, Gregory Lieser, Benjamin T Larson, Tianming Gao, Brian R Lane, Steven C Campbell, Inderbir S Gill, Andrew C Novick, Amr F Fergany.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Partial nephrectomy (PN) has been associated with improved overall survival (OS) in select cohorts with localised renal masses when compared to radical nephrectomy (RN). The driving forces behind these differences have been difficult to elucidate given the heterogeneity of previously compared cohorts.
OBJECTIVE: Compare OS in a subset of patients with unanticipated benign renal masses to minimise the confounding effect of cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We retrospectively evaluated 2608 consecutive clinical T1 enhancing renal masses that were treated with extirpative surgery at our institution between 1999 and 2006. Of these, 499 tumours (19%) were found to be benign on final pathology. Preoperative data and renal functional data were used to generate a propensity model that was then plugged into a multivariate model of survival. Median follow-up for the entire cohort was 50 mo (interquartile range [IQR]: 32-73). INTERVENTION: All patients underwent PN or RN. MEASUREMENTS: We measured OS and cardiac-specific survival. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Five-year OS estimates for the PN (n=388) and RN (n=111) cohorts were 95% (95% confidence interval [CI], 93-98) versus 83% (95% CI, 74-90), respectively (P<0.0001). On multivariate analysis, controlling for both comorbidity and age, RN was associated with a 2.5-fold increased risk of death compared to PN (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.5; 95% CI, 1.3-5.1). Postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was also an independent predictor of OS and cardiac-specific survival (HR: 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-0.99 and HR: 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93-0.99, respectively). The retrospective nature of this analysis limits the strength of the conclusions.
CONCLUSIONS: PN was associated with better OS when compared to RN in patients with unanticipated benign tumours. This observed survival advantage appears partly to be the result of better preservation of eGFR, but other kidney functions or unmeasured factors may also play a role. These data indicate that PN should be aggressively pursued in any patient where PN is technically feasible. Copyright (c) 2010 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20546991     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.04.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  54 in total

1.  [Partial nephrectomy. Rationale and limitations of an organ-preserving approach].

Authors:  J Casuscelli; C Gratzke; C G Stief; M Staehler
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Partial nephrectomy is not the proven standard for Stage T1b renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Tony Finelli
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Kidney cancer: Role of partial nephrectomy continues to expand.

Authors:  Sarah Payton
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 4.  [Renal cell carcinoma: what is new in 2010?].

Authors:  I Tsaur; A Haferkamp
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  Chinese guidelines on the management of renal cell carcinoma (2015 edition).

Authors:  Jun Guo; Jianhui Ma; Yan Sun; Shukui Qin; Dingwei Ye; Fangjian Zhou; Zhisong He; Xinan Sheng; Feng Bi; Dengfeng Cao; Yingxia Chen; Yiran Huang; Houjie Liang; Jun Liang; Jiwei Liu; Wenchao Liu; Yueyin Pan; Yongqian Shu; Xin Song; Weibo Wang; Xiuwen Wang; Xiaoan Wu; Xiaodong Xie; Xin Yao; Shiying Yu; Yanqiao Zhang; Aiping Zhou
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-11

Review 6.  [Renal function in the elderly after radical tumor nephrectomy and partial nephrectomy].

Authors:  S Mehralivand; C Thomas; C Hampel; J W Thüroff; F C Roos
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Matched-pair analysis of renal function in the immediate postoperative period: a comparison of living kidney donors versus patients nephrectomized for renal cell cancer.

Authors:  Daniel Vergho; Maximilian Burger; Moritz Schrammel; Sabine Brookman-May; Michael Gierth; Bernd Hoschke; Kai Lopau; Christian Gilfrich; Hubertus Riedmiller; Ingmar Wolff; Matthias May
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Nephron sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma up to 7 cm in the context of guideline development: a contribution of healthcare research.

Authors:  Steffen Lebentrau; Sven Rauter; Daniel Baumunk; Frank Christoph; Frank König; Matthias May; Martin Schostak
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: analysis of the first 100 cases from a single institution.

Authors:  Scott Tobis; Sriram Venigalla; Joy K Knopf; Emelian Scosyrev; Erdal N Erturk; Dragan J Golijanin; Jean V Joseph; Hani Rashid; Guan Wu
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-06-10

10.  Comparison of progression to end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis after partial or radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma in patients with severe chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Toshio Takagi; Tsunenori Kondo; Kenji Omae; Junpei Iizuka; Hirohito Kobayashi; Kazuhiko Yoshida; Yasunobu Hashimoto; Kazunari Tanabe
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 2.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.