Literature DB >> 20546908

Alternate-day micafungin antifungal prophylaxis in pediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a pharmacokinetic study.

Parinda A Mehta1, Alexander A Vinks, Alexandra Filipovich, Jack Bleesing, Sonata Jodele, Michael B Jordan, Rebecca Marsh, Richard Tarin, Stephanie Edwards, Deborah Fearing, Julia Lawrence, Stella M Davies.   

Abstract

Disseminated fungal infection is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in children undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Prophylaxis with amphotericin B can be limited by renal toxicity. Oral triazoles can be limited by poor absorption, large interindividual pharmacokinetic (PK) variability, and hepatic toxicity, leading to interruptions in therapy and breakthrough infections. Intravenous (i.v.) micafungin has potential advantages, because of its better safety profile, specifically in terms of hepatic and renal toxicity, and lack of drug-drug interactions with common medications used in the HSCT setting. We hypothesized that higher dose micafungin (3 mg/kg) every other day will provide drug exposure similar to standard dosing (1 mg/kg) given daily, and improve patient compliance in very young children in whom oral medications can be challenging, at reduced administration costs. Both animal and adult patient data support the use of this approach. Fifteen children (M/F = 11/4, aged < or =10 years; mean: 3.9 years, range: 0.6-10 years) with various hematologic, metabolic, and immune deficiency disorders undergoing HSCT received a single dose of micafungin (3 mg/kg) i.v. over 1 hour. Dose selection was based on published PK data in pediatric patients, and exploration of different dosing regimens using Monte Carlo PK/PD simulation. Blood samples were drawn around this dose and PK analysis was conducted using standard noncompartmental methods. Micafungin at 3 mg/kg dose was well tolerated in all patients. Measurable plasma concentrations were present in all cases at 48 hours. Half-life and clearance observed were comparable to previous pediatric PK data, with clearance being higher than adults as expected. Volume of distribution was higher in our patients compared to published pediatric data, likely because of a larger proportion of very young children in our study cohort. After correction for protein binding, concentrations at the end of the dosing interval during maintenance treatment remain above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of highly susceptible fungal pathogens. These data suggest that alternate day micafungin dosing, as described here, may provide an attractive alternative for antifungal prophylaxis in HSCT patients and merits further evaluation.
Copyright © 2010 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20546908     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2010.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 1083-8791            Impact factor:   5.742


  10 in total

Review 1.  Echinocandin prophylaxis in patients undergoing haematopoietic cell transplantation and other treatments for haematological malignancies.

Authors:  David J Epstein; Susan K Seo; Janice M Brown; Genovefa A Papanicolaou
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Current role of echinocandins in the management of invasive aspergillosis.

Authors:  Małgorzata Mikulska; Claudio Viscoli
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 3.  Echinocandin antifungal drugs in fungal infections: a comparison.

Authors:  Sharon C-A Chen; Monica A Slavin; Tania C Sorrell
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Safety and Efficacy of Intermittent Intravenous Administration of High-Dose Micafungin.

Authors:  Dionysis Neofytos; Yao-Ting Huang; Kimberly Cheng; Nina Cohen; Miguel-Angel Perales; Juliet Barker; Sergio Giralt; Ann Jakubowski; Genovefa Papanicolaou
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 5.  Administration and Dosing of Systemic Antifungal Agents in Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  Kevin J Downes; Brian T Fisher; Nicole R Zane
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 6.  Micafungin: a review of its use in the prophylaxis and treatment of invasive Candida infections.

Authors:  Lesley J Scott
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Pharmacology and metabolism of anidulafungin, caspofungin and micafungin in the treatment of invasive candidosis: review of the literature.

Authors:  G Kofla; Markus Ruhnke
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 2.175

Review 8.  Antifungal chemoprophylaxis in children and adolescents with haematological malignancies and following allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: review of the literature and options for clinical practice.

Authors:  Athanasios Tragiannidis; Charalampos Dokos; Thomas Lehrnbecher; Andreas H Groll
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 11.431

Review 9.  Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Micafungin.

Authors:  Roeland E Wasmann; Eline W Muilwijk; David M Burger; Paul E Verweij; Catherijne A Knibbe; Roger J Brüggemann
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 10.  Invasive Aspergillosis in Children: Update on Current Guidelines.

Authors:  Athanasia Apsemidou; Nikolaos Petridis; Timoleon-Achilleas Vyzantiadis; Athanasios Tragiannidis
Journal:  Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 2.576

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.