Literature DB >> 20546827

Evaluation of the immune response induced by intradermal vaccination by using a needle-less system in comparison with the intramuscular route in conventional pigs.

L Ferrari1, P Borghetti, S Gozio, E De Angelis, L Ballotta, J Smeets, A Blanchaert, P Martelli.   

Abstract

The immune response induced by intradermal vaccination using a needle-less device was evaluated in conventional pigs in comparison with the more conventional intramuscular vaccination; to this purpose, vaccination against Aujeszky's Disease (AD) was used as a model of antiviral immunity. Two groups of pigs (n=10 each) were vaccinated 4 weeks apart respectively by the intramuscular (IM group) and intradermal route (ID group; needle-less I.D.A.L.® vaccinator) with an AD modified live virus. Ten pigs injected with the vaccine adjuvant only were kept as sham-vaccinated controls (C group). On blood samples collected at 0, 2, 4, 5, 6 and 7 weeks post-vaccination (PV) ADV-specific virus neutralizing (VN) antibodies, IFN-γ secreting cells (SC), lymphocyte subsets and IFN-γ gene expression in PBMC were evaluated. VN antibodies increased after the 1st vaccination and peaked after the 2nd vaccination in both vaccinated groups. Also IFN-γ SC reached maximum levels in both groups after administration of the booster dose. Pigs in the control group remained negative for both parameters throughout the study. Flow cytometry showed persistently higher levels of CD3-CD8α+ Natural Killer cells in both vaccinated pigs. The ID group showed an earlier and regulated activation characterized by an increase of cytotoxic CD8β+ T lymphocytes and CD25+ cells after the boosting dose. No statistically significant differences between treated and control groups were detected for memory CD4+CD8α+(low) T cells. Upregulation of IFN-γ gene expression in PBMC was detected in ID and IM pigs after both vaccine administrations, although at a different extent. Overall, the results showed that the intradermal vaccine delivery by a needle-less device can prime a strong humoral and cellular immune response comparable to that obtained by the intramuscular vaccination. Copyright Â
© 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20546827     DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2010.04.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Vet Sci        ISSN: 0034-5288            Impact factor:   2.534


  8 in total

1.  Increased humoral immunity by DNA vaccination using an α-tocopherol-based adjuvant.

Authors:  Ingrid Karlsson; Marie Borggren; Jens Nielsen; Dennis Christensen; Jim Williams; Anders Fomsgaard
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Vector optimization and needle-free intradermal application of a broadly protective polyvalent influenza A DNA vaccine for pigs and humans.

Authors:  Marie Borggren; Jens Nielsen; Karoline Bragstad; Ingrid Karlsson; Jesper S Krog; James A Williams; Anders Fomsgaard
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Intradermal Delivery of Antigens Enhances Specific IgG and Diminishes IgE Production: Potential Use for Vaccination and Allergy Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Takuwa Yasuda; Takehiro Ura; Masaru Taniguchi; Hisahiro Yoshida
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Safety and immune responses after intradermal application of Porcilis PRRS in either the neck or the perianal region.

Authors:  Julia Stadler; Lena Naderer; Lisa Beffort; Mathias Ritzmann; Daniela Emrich; Walter Hermanns; Kerstin Fiebig; Armin Saalmüller; Wilhelm Gerner; Bernadette Glatthaar-Saalmüller; Andrea Ladinig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Influenza NG-34 T cell conserved epitope adjuvanted with CAF01 as a possible influenza vaccine candidate.

Authors:  Marta Sisteré-Oró; Gabriel K Pedersen; Lorena Córdoba; Sergi López-Serrano; Dennis Christensen; Ayub Darji
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 3.683

6.  Safety of PRRSV-2 MLV vaccines administrated via the intramuscular or intradermal route and evaluation of PRRSV transmission upon needle-free and needle delivery.

Authors:  Adthakorn Madapong; Kepalee Saeng-Chuto; Angkana Tantituvanont; Dachrit Nilubol
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Protective effect of a polyvalent influenza DNA vaccine in pigs.

Authors:  Ingrid Karlsson; Marie Borggren; Maiken Worsøe Rosenstierne; Ramona Trebbien; James A Williams; Enric Vidal; Júlia Vergara-Alert; David Solanes Foz; Ayub Darji; Marta Sisteré-Oró; Joaquim Segalés; Jens Nielsen; Anders Fomsgaard
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 2.046

8.  High Doses of Inactivated African Swine Fever Virus Are Safe, but Do Not Confer Protection against a Virulent Challenge.

Authors:  Estefanía Cadenas-Fernández; Jose M Sánchez-Vizcaíno; Erwin van den Born; Aleksandra Kosowska; Emma van Kilsdonk; Paloma Fernández-Pacheco; Carmina Gallardo; Marisa Arias; Jose A Barasona
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.