Literature DB >> 20546569

A prospective cohort study to investigate cost-minimisation, of Traditional open, open fAst track recovery and laParoscopic fASt track multimodal management, for surgical patients with colon carcinomas (TAPAS study).

Jurrian C Reurings1, Willem R Spanjersberg, Henk J M Oostvogel, Erik Buskens, John Maring, Flip Kruijt, Camiel Rosman, Peter van Duivendijk, Cees H C Dejong, Cees J H M van Laarhoven.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The present developments in colon surgery are characterized by two innovations: the introduction of the laparoscopic operation technique and fast recovery programs such as the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) recovery program. The Tapas-study was conceived to determine which of the three treatment programs: open conventional surgery, open 'ERAS' surgery or laparoscopic 'ERAS' surgery for patients with colon carcinomas is most cost minimizing? METHOD/
DESIGN: The Tapas-study is a three-arm multicenter prospective cohort study. All patients with colon carcinoma, eligible for surgical treatment within the study period in four general teaching hospitals and one university hospital will be included. This design produces three cohorts: Conventional open surgery is the control exposure (cohort 1). Open surgery with ERAS recovery (cohort 2) and laparoscopic surgery with ERAS recovery (cohort 3) are the alternative exposures. Three separate time periods are used in order to prevent attrition bias. Primary outcome parameters are the two main cost factors: direct medical costs (real cost price calculation) and the indirect non medical costs (friction method). Secondary outcome parameters are mortality, complications, surgical-oncological resection margins, hospital stay, readmission rates, time back to work/recovery, health status and quality of life. Based on an estimated difference in direct medical costs (highest cost factor) of 38% between open and laparoscopic surgery (alfa = 0.01, beta = 0.05), a group size of 3 x 40 = 120 patients is calculated. DISCUSSION: The Tapas-study is three-arm multicenter cohort study that will provide a cost evaluation of three treatment programs for patients with colon carcinoma, which may serve as a guideline for choice of treatment and investment strategies in hospitals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN44649165.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20546569      PMCID: PMC2901198          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2482-10-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Surg        ISSN: 1471-2482            Impact factor:   2.102


  25 in total

Review 1.  Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions.

Authors:  Peter McCulloch; Irving Taylor; Mitsuru Sasako; Bryony Lovett; Damian Griffin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-06-15

2.  ["Fast-track" colonic surgery-first experience with a clinical procedure for accelerating postoperative recovery].

Authors:  W Schwenk; W Raue; O Haase; T Junghans; J M Müller
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Colonic surgery with accelerated rehabilitation or conventional care.

Authors:  Linda Basse; Jens Erik Thorbøl; Kristine Løssl; Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  N S Abraham; J M Young; M J Solomon
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 5.  Long-term results of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection.

Authors:  E Kuhry; W F Schwenk; R Gaupset; U Romild; H J Bonjer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-04-16

6.  Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Jane C Weeks; Heidi Nelson; Shari Gelber; Daniel Sargent; Georgene Schroeder
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-01-16       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Implementation of a clinical pathway decreases length of stay and cost for bowel resection.

Authors:  T A Pritts; M S Nussbaum; L V Flesch; E J Fegelman; A A Parikh; J E Fischer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial.

Authors:  Antonio M Lacy; Juan C García-Valdecasas; Salvadora Delgado; Antoni Castells; Pilar Taurá; Josep M Piqué; Josep Visa
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-06-29       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Convalescence after colonic resection with fast-track versus conventional care.

Authors:  D Hjort Jakobsen; E Sonne; L Basse; T Bisgaard; H Kehlet
Journal:  Scand J Surg       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.360

10.  Randomized clinical trial of the costs of open and laparoscopic surgery for colonic cancer.

Authors:  M Janson; I Björholt; P Carlsson; E Haglind; M Henriksson; E Lindholm; B Anderberg
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Perioperative protocols in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Mia Debarros; Scott R Steele
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2013-09

2.  Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols: Time to change practice?

Authors:  Megan Melnyk; Rowan G Casey; Peter Black; Anthony J Koupparis
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Is Laparoscopic Surgery the Standard of Care for GI Luminal Cancer?

Authors:  Shailesh V Shrikhande; Vinay Gaikwad; Ashwin Desouza; Mahesh Goel
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 4.  Systematic review and meta-analysis for laparoscopic versus open colon surgery with or without an ERAS programme.

Authors:  W R Spanjersberg; J D P van Sambeeck; A Bremers; C Rosman; C J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  A meta-analysis of short-term outcome of laparoscopic surgery versus conventional open surgery on colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Guojun Tong; Guiyang Zhang; Jian Liu; Zhengzhao Zheng; Yan Chen; Enhai Cui
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Fast-track multidisciplinary treatment versus conventional treatment for colorectal cancer: a multicenter, open-label randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Jun Li; Xiang-Xing Kong; Jiao-Jiao Zhou; Yong-Mao Song; Xue-Feng Huang; Gen-Hai Li; Xiao-Jiang Ying; Xiao-Yu Dai; Min Lu; Kai Jiang; Dong-Liang Fu; Xin-Lin Li; Jin-Jie He; Jian-Wei Wang; Li-Feng Sun; Dong Xu; Jing-Yan Xu; Min Chen; Yu Tian; Jing-Song Li; Min Yan; Ying Yuan; Ke-Feng Ding
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Fast track in large intestine surgery - review of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Krystyn Sosada; Maciej Wiewiora; Jerzy Piecuch; Wojciech Zurawiński
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 1.195

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.