| Literature DB >> 20546558 |
Karin S Hougaard1, Petra Jackson, Keld A Jensen, Jens J Sloth, Katrin Löschner, Erik H Larsen, Renie K Birkedal, Anni Vibenholt, Anne-Mette Z Boisen, Håkan Wallin, Ulla Vogel.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Engineered nanoparticles are smaller than 100 nm and designed to improve or achieve new physico-chemical properties. Consequently, also toxicological properties may change compared to the parent compound. We examined developmental and neurobehavioral effects following maternal exposure to a nanoparticulate UV-filter (UV-titan L181).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20546558 PMCID: PMC2908059 DOI: 10.1186/1743-8977-7-16
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Part Fibre Toxicol ISSN: 1743-8977 Impact factor: 9.400
Physico-chemical characteristics of UV-Titan L181 particles.
| This study | Product data sheet | |
|---|---|---|
| Phases | Rutile | Rutile |
| Average XRD-size [nm] | 20.6 ± 0.3 | Approx. 17 |
| XRD-size [100]a | 14.4-15.5 | - |
| XRD-size [001]a | 38.4 | - |
| Specific surface area [m2/g] | 107.7 | Approx. 70 |
| Elemental concentrations | [wt%] | |
| Silicon | 5.61 | - |
| Titanium | 42.44 | - |
| Aluminum | 2.42 | - |
| Zirconium | 8.65 | - |
| Sodium | 0.45 | - |
| Oxygenb | 35.24 | - |
| LOI | 5.19 | - |
| TGA | 6.1 ± 0.4 | - |
LOI, loss on ignition; TGA, thermogravimetric analysis (N2 atmosphere, 40 - 800°C, 10°C/min). a Estimate of the average crystallite size along the shortest and longest crystallographic direction. bCalculated by difference from 100 wt%.
Figure 1TEM image of TiO. Transmission electron microscopy image showing the typical equidimensional to elongated morphology of the TiO2 crystallites in UV-Titan L181. Bar = 50 nm.
Observed m/z values and tentative molecular formulas
| m/z | Tentative molecular formular | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 72 | C4H7N |
| 88 | C4H7NO | |
| 104 | C4H7NO2 | |
| 2 | 81 | C6H8 |
| 97 | C6H8O | |
| 113 | C6H8O2 | |
| 3 | 83 | C6H10 |
| 99 | C6H10O | |
| 115 | C6H10O2 | |
| 4 | 141 | C8H13O2 |
| 157* | C8H13O3 | |
| 173 | C8H13O4 |
* Molecular formula determined from exact mass measurement (mass accuracy 1 ppm)
Figure 2Characteristics of the exposure atmosphere. A) Particle number size distribution of the UV-Titan L181 in the exposure chamber. Data are based on nine one-hour exposure measurements. Mean ± SD. B) Accumulated number and mass concentration of particle concentrations in the exposure chamber. It is assumed that the optical and mobility particle sizes can be directly compared and data gap is filled by linear interpolation.
Titanium concentration in livers, lungs and milk.
| Origin | Tissue | Treatment | N | Time after exposure | Ti |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adult females | Lungs | Exposed | 3 | 5 | 38 ± 6 |
| Controls | 3 | 5 | < 5 | ||
| Exposed | 3 | 26-27 | 33 ± 18 | ||
| Controls | 3 | 26-27 | < 0.7 | ||
| Livers | Exposed | 3 | 5 | < 0.5 | |
| Controls | 3 | 5 | < 0.5 | ||
| Exposed | 3 | 26-27 | 0.5 ± 0.3 | ||
| Controls | 3 | 26-27 | < 0.2 | ||
| Pups | Livers | Exposed | 2a | 5 | < 0.4 |
| Controls | 2a | 5 | 0.4 ± 0.1 | ||
| Exposed | 3 | 26-27 | < 0.4 | ||
| Controls | 3 | 26-27 | < 0.4 | ||
| Milk | Exposed | 2b | 5 | < 1 | |
| Controls | 2b | 5 | < 1 |
Mean ± SD corresponding to the two detected Ti isotopes. Pooled sample from 5a and 4b animals.
Total cell counts after bronchioalveolar lavage
| Treatment | Days after exposure | Total live cell count | Dead cell count |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 5 | 166500 ± 13642 | 14000 ± 2236 (9%) |
| Exposed | 5 | 202000 ± 18083 | 18667 ± 2014 (10%) |
| Control | 26-27 | 171600 ± 19724 | 13600 ± 3748 (9%)** |
| Exposed | 26-27 | 177000 ± 14325 | 25857 ± 3141 (15%) |
Cells were counted in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from time-mated mice that had not achieved pregnancy 5 days after termination of exposure (NP; n = 8-9) and in littering time-mated dams after weaning, 26-27 days after exposure (P; n = 13-14). Mean ± SEM. **p < 0.01 vs. control P.
Figure 3Differential cell count in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. The total number of cells in BAL subdivided by cell type. A: time-mated mice that had not achieved pregnancy, 5 days after termination of exposure (n = 8-9). B: littering time-mated dams after weaning, 26-27 days after exposure (n = 10-14). Mean ±SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001 vs. controls.
Figure 4Open field. Open field performance during a 3-min observation period in male and female offspring from dams exposed to ambient air or TiOduring gestation. (A) Ambulation. (B) Visits to the central zone of the open field. Time spent in central zone of the open field (C). Mean ± SEM, n = 12-14. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, vs. same gender controls.
Figure 5Prepulse inhibition. Prepulse inhibition in male (A) and female (B) offspring from dams exposed to ambient air or TiOduring gestation, at four different levels of prepulse. Mean ± SEM, n = 10-14. (*) 0.05
Figure 6Time-to-first F2 litter. Littering curves for male offspring of control and UV-titan exposed pregnant mice. As adults, male C57BL offspring were mated to naïve CBA/J mice and time-to-first-delivery of F2 litter was recorded.