Literature DB >> 20546285

Frequency of biochemical hypoglycaemia in adults with Type 1 diabetes with and without impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia: no identifiable differences using continuous glucose monitoring.

P Choudhary1, J Geddes, J V Freeman, C J Emery, S R Heller, B M Frier.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia (IAH) is a major risk factor for severe hypoglycaemia in Type 1 diabetes. Although biochemical hypoglycaemia is asserted to be more frequent in IAH, this has not been estimated accurately. The aim of this study was to use Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) to quantify hypoglycaemia in IAH and evaluate its use in identifying impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia.
METHODS: Ninety-five patients with Type 1 diabetes were classified as having normal (n = 74) or impaired awareness (n = 21) using an established method of assessing hypoglycaemia awareness. Hypoglycaemia exposure was assessed prospectively over 9-12 months using weekly 4-point capillary home blood glucose monitoring (HBGM), 5 days of CGM and prospective reporting of severe hypoglycaemia. The frequencies of biochemical and severe hypoglycaemia were compared in patients with normal and impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia.
RESULTS: Patients with impaired awareness had a 3-fold higher incidence of severe hypoglycaemia than those with normal awareness [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 3.37 (95% CI 1.30-8.7); P = 0.01] and 1.6-fold higher incidence of hypoglycaemia on weekly HBGM [IRR 1.63 (95% CI 1.09-2.44); P = 0.02]. No significant differences were observed with CGM [IRR for sensor glucose < or = 3.0 mmol/l 1.47 (95% CI 0.91-2.39); P = 0.12; IRR for sensor glucose < or = 2.2 mmol/l 1.23 (95% CI 0.76-1.98); P = 0.40].
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with Type 1 diabetes with impaired awareness had a 3-fold higher risk of severe hypoglycaemia and 1.6-fold higher incidence of biochemical hypoglycaemia measured with weekly glucose monitoring compared with normal awareness, but 5 days of CGM did not differentiate those with impaired from those with normal awareness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20546285     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.03006.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabet Med        ISSN: 0742-3071            Impact factor:   4.359


  20 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of hypoglycemia unawareness and implications in diabetic patients.

Authors:  Iciar Martín-Timón; Francisco Javier Del Cañizo-Gómez
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2015-07-10

Review 2.  Evidence-informed clinical practice recommendations for treatment of type 1 diabetes complicated by problematic hypoglycemia.

Authors:  Pratik Choudhary; Michael R Rickels; Peter A Senior; Marie-Christine Vantyghem; Paola Maffi; Thomas W Kay; Bart Keymeulen; Nobuya Inagaki; Frantisek Saudek; Roger Lehmann; Bernhard J Hering
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Role of continuous glucose monitoring in the management of glycogen storage disorders.

Authors:  Mrudu Herbert; Surekha Pendyal; Mugdha Rairikar; Carine Halaby; Robert W Benjamin; Priya S Kishnani
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 4.982

Review 4.  The benefits, limitations, and cost-effectiveness of advanced technologies in the management of patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Robert A Vigersky
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-03

5.  Glucose-responsive insulin and glucagon delivery (dual-hormone artificial pancreas) in adults with type 1 diabetes: a randomized crossover controlled trial.

Authors:  Ahmad Haidar; Laurent Legault; Maryse Dallaire; Ammar Alkhateeb; Adèle Coriati; Virginie Messier; Peiyao Cheng; Maude Millette; Benoit Boulet; Rémi Rabasa-Lhoret
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Clinical implications and economic impact of accuracy differences among commercially available blood glucose monitoring systems.

Authors:  Erwin S Budiman; Navendu Samant; Ansgar Resch
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-03-01

7.  Consistency of quantitative scores of hypoglycemia severity and glycemic lability and comparison with continuous glucose monitoring system measures in long-standing type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Peter A Senior; Melena D Bellin; Rodolfo Alejandro; Jon W Yankey; William R Clarke; Julie C Qidwai; Traci R Schwieger; Thomas L Eggerman; Mark A Robien; Michael R Rickels
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 6.118

8.  Altered functional connectivity during hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Peter Jacob; Munachiso Nwokolo; Sally M Cordon; Ian A Macdonald; Fernando O Zelaya; Stephanie A Amiel; Owen O'Daly; Pratik Choudhary
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 6.960

9.  Continuous Monitoring of Glucose for Type 1 Diabetes: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2018-02-21

10.  Cognitive, behavioural and psychological barriers to the prevention of severe hypoglycaemia: A qualitative study of adults with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Jane Speight; Shalleen M Barendse; Harsimran Singh; Stuart A Little; Martin K Rutter; Simon R Heller; James Am Shaw
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2014-04-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.